Cams: 2000 vs 2001-04
00 LS1 .500/.500 lift, 209/198 duration, 115.5 LSA
Rated 350 HP, 350 ft-lbs
01-04 LS1 .479/.467 lift, 207/196 duration, 116 LSA
Rated 350 HP, 375 ft-lbs
The reason for asking is that I am looking at getting a coupe to run time trials with NASA and I am wondering if one cam would make a better track car than the other (rules limited on mods). Would the 2000 cam be better at high RPM and/or respond better to headers/CAI/tune/etc? TIA



LS1 cam profile changed to: .500/0.500, 198/208 on 115.5LSA (From: 0.472/0.479, 202/210 on 117)
C5 camshafts:
'97-'99 LS1 .479/.472 lift, 207/199 duration, 117 LSA
Rated 345 HP, 350 ft-lbs
'00 LS1 .500/.500 lift, 209/198 duration, 115.5 LSA
Rated 350 HP, 350 ft-lbs
'01-04 LS1 .479/.467 lift, 207/196 duration, 116 LSA
Rated 350 HP, 375 ft-lbs
'01 LS6 .525/.525 lift, 211/204 duration, 116 LSA
Rated 385 HP, 385 ft-lbs
'02-04 LS6 .551/.555 lift, 218/204 duration, 117.5 LSA
Rated 405 HP, 400 ft-lbs
This was done to offset the pre-cats that were added to the exhaust on the California cars in 2000. The 49-state cars did not get the pre-cats, but did get the cam.
As a result, the 2000 49-state car was still rated at 345 HP/350 TQ, but was actually about 10 HP/TQ stronger than the typical '97-'99.
I saw this many times at dyno days back in the '00 timeframe.
In '01 there were several changes made, most of which improved TQ, but not HP, over the '00. The '01 was rated 350HP/375TQ.
- Somewhat more open air cleaner.
- Larger MAF.
- LS6 intake manifold.
- LS6 cast exhaust manifolds.
- slightly improved heads.
- back to a slightly smaller cam.
- pre-cats om all models.
So, all things considered, the '00 cam is the strongest, and definitely the one to use in a spec series race. I sold mine last spring to a guy who was building an engine for similar requirements.
DG
This was done to offset the pre-cats that were added to the exhaust on the California cars in 2000. The 49-state cars did not get the pre-cats, but did get the cam.
As a result, the 2000 49-state car was still rated at 345 HP/350 TQ, but was actually about 10 HP/TQ stronger than the typical '97-'99.
I saw this many times at dyno days back in the '00 timeframe.
In '01 there were several changes made, most of which improved TQ, but not HP, over the '00. The '01 was rated 350HP/375TQ.
- Somewhat more open air cleaner.
- Larger MAF.
- LS6 intake manifold.
- LS6 cast exhaust manifolds.
- slightly improved heads.
- back to a slightly smaller cam.
- pre-cats om all models.
So, all things considered, the '00 cam is the strongest, and definitely the one to use in a spec series race. I sold mine last spring to a guy who was building an engine for similar requirements.
DG
There is no torque restriction in the class currently so if the 01-04 with those mods would be way up on torque, that is probably worth it for the potential small hit to power.
The cam of the 00 sounds to be the better of the choices, but it really just a choice of 6 one, half dozen the other.
Dunno, but if all this is to determine the year of car, I'd say get an 01, but if you only are deciding on which year motor, well, I'd still say the 01. You can make more power than the other guy by maximizing other factors than just having a bigger cam.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
This was done to offset the pre-cats that were added to the exhaust on the California cars in 2000. The 49-state cars did not get the pre-cats, but did get the cam.
As a result, the 2000 49-state car was still rated at 345 HP/350 TQ, but was actually about 10 HP/TQ stronger than the typical '97-'99.
I saw this many times at dyno days back in the '00 timeframe.
In '01 there were several changes made, most of which improved TQ, but not HP, over the '00. The '01 was rated 350HP/375TQ.
- Somewhat more open air cleaner.
- Larger MAF.
- LS6 intake manifold.
- LS6 cast exhaust manifolds.
- slightly improved heads.
- back to a slightly smaller cam.
- pre-cats om all models.
So, all things considered, the '00 cam is the strongest, and definitely the one to use in a spec series race. I sold mine last spring to a guy who was building an engine for similar requirements.
DG

Thank you for the correction.







