When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've got a Powerbond PB1117SS damper on the way and plan to pin it and use the OEM TTY bolt. The bolt comes with a H+C gasket set I bought so I might as well use that instead of spending extra for a re-useble bolt I'll hopefully never re-use!
I will be following Bill Curlee's advice to heat the balancer up before putting it on, hopefully making life a little easier.
Go ARP and get the 6 point instead of 12 that way if you want to use an impact gun you can. I like the ATI pin kit and have used it. Very easy and works great for a keyed balancer plus if you ever have to replace the balancer you won't have to do it again.
ARP & ATI Pin Kit here! Very happy and no issues since install.
Would recommend to anyone doing the job - cheap insurance and simple
Using a Snap-on Tech torque wrench, which has the angle meter built into it, also gives the value of torque used to reach the desired angle. In every instance of using a stock bolt and doing the final pass of 140 deg, the torque value was 230-250 lbft of torque.
I personally wouldnt use an impact on the bolt. Impact is hard on the threads and not worth possibly killing a crank over.
Either your torque wrench needs calibration of the balancer is not fully seated when you are performing this operation.
240ft/lb stretches the bolt between .006-.010" depending on the thread's friction factor. 140 deg of rotation after the balancer has seated stretches the bolt nearly .029".
I don't know what torque value for the OEM bolt is expressed in ft/lb with the OEM specified 37 ft/lb + 140 deg but I'm certain it's more than 240 ft/lbs and probably closer to 500 ft/lbs.
I am very curious about the final torque value for seating the oem bolt to 140 degrees. There are lots of folks who hold the balancer still by fixing the outer pulley section of the balancer with a strap wrench or belt of some sort. If the proper fastening procedure applies up to 500 ft/lbs to the damper I would think there is a good chance of damaging the rubber/steel hub to pulley interface of the damper...
Also, you mention locking the flywheel as the only probable method of achieving the necessary torque. I wouldn't want to put that kind of torque through the crankshaft into the flywheel with the crank bearings dry (for fear of scoring the bearings). Is there another way to fix the damper without transferring all that torque through the crank?
I am very curious about the final torque value for seating the oem bolt to 140 degrees. There are lots of folks who hold the balancer still by fixing the outer pulley section of the balancer with a strap wrench or belt of some sort. If the proper fastening procedure applies up to 500 ft/lbs to the damper I would think there is a good chance of damaging the rubber/steel hub to pulley interface of the damper...
Also, you mention locking the flywheel as the only probable method of achieving the necessary torque. I wouldn't want to put that kind of torque through the crankshaft into the flywheel with the crank bearings dry (for fear of scoring the bearings). Is there another way to fix the damper without transferring all that torque through the crank?
I'm failing to see the correlation, between the main bearings, and torquing the balancer. The torque is applied about the crank's axis of rotation, so no side loading is involved. If rotating the crank is what you are concerned about, how does one torque the flywheel or pressure plate, without rotating the crank?
My personal choice is to lock the flywheel using the starter ring gear. I believe this is the procedure in the service manual. It may not be an issue to hold the damper by the outer ring with some type of strap wrench, but I've always worried about doing this way.
I'm failing to see the correlation, between the main bearings, and torquing the balancer. The torque is applied about the crank's axis of rotation, so no side loading is involved. If rotating the crank is what you are concerned about, how does one torque the flywheel or pressure plate, without rotating the crank?
It's not the torque itself damaging the bearings or crankshaft that I'm worried about, it's the side loading that IS involved when I'm standing on the end of a two foot breaker bar attempting to reach the specified bolt angle spec. Sure, that's a static linear force of less than 200lbs (dynamically higher), but it's still a force exerted mainly on the front crank bearing with no oil being pumped through it. Any torque deflection of the crankshaft front to rear while applying the side load will result in a very small area of the bearing being worn back and forth repeatedly as I struggle to apply 500 ft-lbs to the crank bolt.
Maybe I'm making a big deal about nothing, but it still seems wrong to do that.
It's not the torque itself damaging the bearings or crankshaft that I'm worried about, it's the side loading that IS involved when I'm standing on the end of a two foot breaker bar attempting to reach the specified bolt angle spec. Sure, that's a static linear force of less than 200lbs (dynamically higher), but it's still a force exerted mainly on the front crank bearing with no oil being pumped through it. Any torque deflection of the crankshaft front to rear while applying the side load will result in a very small area of the bearing being worn back and forth repeatedly as I struggle to apply 500 ft-lbs to the crank bolt.
Maybe I'm making a big deal about nothing, but it still seems wrong to do that.
Well, if that train of thought makes you feel better, about how you are going to proceed with your project........rock on.
I am very curious about the final torque value for seating the oem bolt to 140 degrees. There are lots of folks who hold the balancer still by fixing the outer pulley section of the balancer with a strap wrench or belt of some sort. If the proper fastening procedure applies up to 500 ft/lbs to the damper I would think there is a good chance of damaging the rubber/steel hub to pulley interface of the damper...
Also, you mention locking the flywheel as the only probable method of achieving the necessary torque. I wouldn't want to put that kind of torque through the crankshaft into the flywheel with the crank bearings dry (for fear of scoring the bearings). Is there another way to fix the damper without transferring all that torque through the crank?
I fabricated my own locking device, but it essentially duplicates what the OEM locking tool does. The crank is stationary during this procedure if properly locked down so I do not understand you concern for scored bearings.
The crank is stationary during this procedure if properly locked down so I do not understand you concerned for scored bearings.
The crank is locked at the rear, the torque (up to 500 ft-lbs. as you suggest) is being applied at the front, the crank will twist. I'm probably worried about nothing as the crank likely won't twist enough for the bearing surface to actually slip. If this was a concern it would only really affect the front bearing as that's the one that will take all of the load and the one that will move the most as the crank twists.
BTW, I hope you're wrong about the 500 ft-lbs required... I was looking at a 1/2" drive breaker bar yesterday and it cautioned about applying more than 376 ft-lbs of torque.