When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey guys. This is a great forum that has been created, ton of really good information. Unfortunately I am at now in need of some advise on new engine build.
I have a 2003 Z06/ls6 that had some upgrades at the time I purchased the car. 215 ET Performance heads, long tube headers, big cam (do not have grind card), underdrive pulley, dyno tune approx. 550hp at crank.
A missing chunk of #7 piston is the cause of this new engine build. After tearing down, I found 2 cracks in the cylinder wall.
My mission is to replace with something more durable. Would the ls3 or ls7 be a better choice compared to just replacing the ls6? All forged of course. I would prefer to reuse all upgraded parts listed. Does anyone know if it that is possible?
I've read that the LS7 has thinner cylinder walls than an LS3/2. If you're not going for a FI application I would assume the LS3 would be a better motor just for that reason. But I think people have been safe with the LS7 if you're just going to use H/C/I.
I don't know about the heads so I can't answer that one. I would optimize the cam for whatever engine size you end up with. I have a forged LS7 based engine in my 02 Coupe and love it. The car is a blast to drive. I prefer the power delivery of the large cubic inches to the supercharged setup that I had before.
I've read that the LS7 has thinner cylinder walls than an LS3/2. If you're not going for a FI application I would assume the LS3 would be a better motor just for that reason.
From: Wylie TX --> Less is More, except under the hood !
Originally Posted by Dominic Toretto
I've read that the LS7 has thinner cylinder walls than an LS3/2. If you're not going for a FI application I would assume the LS3 would be a better motor just for that reason. But I think people have been safe with the LS7 if you're just going to use H/C/I.
-Alex
I think you got that backwards Alex...
Because the cylinder walls on the LS7 are so close together it makes the LS3 a better choice for a blower.
LS7 would likely be the best for a NA application.
How about a 454 built from a LS3 block that has been resleeved, 5000.00 block, crank, rods, pistons, +1200.00 for the LS3 block core.
Or I was reading they can do a 427 for you for 3500.00 for the short block, and 1500.00 for the LS3 block core, the 427 is not sleeved, it's small enough to not need sleeves.
Thats a very loaded question....but I can think of no circumstance where a 6.2 out shines a 7.0 (if the combo is built for the cubes). N/A or FI or on the jug !!
Thanks....budget goals ?? performance goals ?? cars main duty ??
Who knows.... the point is, you are regurgitating a fear discussed some 5 years ago......and has long since been proven wrong. Next time you see a guy with a c6 Zo6 supercharged, ask him how disappointed he is with 630 RWHP on a conservative tune.....
Car will just be a weekend driver and will see some track time also. NA I think is the best for what I'm looking for. I've heard that all ls series motors will accept the same heads and cam. If that is the case, ls7 seems to be the best choice. What difficulties will I run into with the factory wiring conversion?
The wiring is easy if you buy the conversion harnesses. It is just plug and play. You will have to tap existing bosses on the side of the block for the knock sensors.
Who knows.... the point is, you are regurgitating a fear discussed some 5 years ago......and has long since been proven wrong. Next time you see a guy with a c6 Zo6 supercharged, ask him how disappointed he is with 630 RWHP on a conservative tune.....
I wasn't regurgitating anything actually, just using my own knowledge that LS7s have thinner cylinder walls than as LS3 PERIOD. Since that was my point of reference and you said that was proven wrong, place source your information that LS7s have thicker cylinder walls than LS3s. Thanks.
The new LS3 blocks (2009 & newer) are shared with the LS9 as far as I know, and are extremely strong and stiff... GM put a heckuva lot of testing into that one for support of the LS9 engine.
A forged short block with a stroker crank based on an LS3 block would be a great place to start, the 4.060 bore is good for head breathing too. Going bigger than that can start getting expensive in a hurry. I've never researched this as if I were actually going to build it, but this is my observation based on what I've read.
"LS7" and "427" sound cool, but anything starting with an LS7 block is going to be a bit more expensive. An LS3 with a 4.1" crank will get you 426 inches.
More cubes is better, but will the parts you currently have allow you to take full advantage of the extra cubes? Not IMO.
If you buy the larger engine accepting that you'll only gain TQ you may be happy with the outcome, but it will not run like other similar CI motors.
I have had an LS7 based 440 for years now that I'm very happy with.