When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You are here to learn, huh? On an internet forum? If a professional opinion is what you desire, then why don't you do yourself a favor, and pick up the phone. Talk to the experts at A&A, LG, England Green, ECS, etc. That does not mean post within this forum, and make a shout out for them to reply. It means you actually and actively pursue the knowledge you desire. Are you willing to do that, or would you rather just repeat what you think is true, from this forum, LS1Tech, etc?
Actually I did call around. And everyone that I spoke with informed that it is a MUCH better idea to run boost through a car with thicker cylinder walls. So I am just trying to clarify where this misinformation is being pooped from on here. Thanks for the assumption though
You guys got any thoughts outside of the FI power plants? Just looking for NA engine info. I do know about the issues with #7. I thought a good tune would take care of this issue???
You guys got any thoughts outside of the FI power plants? Just looking for NA engine info. I do know about the issues with #7. I thought a good tune would take care of this issue???
Again sorry for your issues. I'm just going to bow out of the argument with the other guy instead of clutter the thread.
Anyway since there is no way to source who did the work prior to purchasing the car, I honestly would still feel safe and assume it was a bad tune previously. There are plenty of high hp NA anf FI LS1/6 cars running around. Those cars are built for the application and can go the distance. Contact Anthony at LG, he can definitely give you some further insight to which block to go to. Honestly though an LS2/3 is still a good choice and will offer more discplacement but a few things need to be changed over to run that engine in a C5 chassis.
Again sorry for your issues. I'm just going to bow out of the argument with the other guy instead of clutter the thread.
Anyway since there is no way to source who did the work prior to purchasing the car, I honestly would still feel safe and assume it was a bad tune previously. There are plenty of high hp NA anf FI LS1/6 cars running around. Those cars are built for the application and can go the distance. Contact Anthony at LG, he can definitely give you some further insight to which block to go to. Honestly though an LS2/3 is still a good choice and will offer more discplacement but a few things need to be changed over to run that engine in a C5 chassis.
Hey guys. This is a great forum that has been created, ton of really good information. Unfortunately I am at now in need of some advise on new engine build.
I have a 2003 Z06/ls6 that had some upgrades at the time I purchased the car. 215 ET Performance heads, long tube headers, big cam (do not have grind card), underdrive pulley, dyno tune approx. 550hp at crank.
A missing chunk of #7 piston is the cause of this new engine build. After tearing down, I found 2 cracks in the cylinder wall.
My mission is to replace with something more durable. Would the ls3 or ls7 be a better choice compared to just replacing the ls6? All forged of course. I would prefer to reuse all upgraded parts listed. Does anyone know if it that is possible?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Create LS6 most durable of the LSx engines. Not the power you had, but had the durability you asked for
Decided to go with the ls6 stroker 383. Installed and dyno 480rwhp. Anthony at LGM took care of the tune. Can't say enough good about LGM, good group of guys. Should be ready for trip to MSR Cresson first weekend in February.
From: Wylie TX --> Less is More, except under the hood !
Originally Posted by TexasRob
Decided to go with the ls6 stroker 383. Installed and dyno 480rwhp. Anthony at LGM took care of the tune. Can't say enough good about LGM, good group of guys. Should be ready for trip to MSR Cresson first weekend in February.
Congrats ! Anthony and the boys at LG's does some nice work...
Man, you are right. All the shops have stopped selling the kits, and all the shops have stopped installing superchargers on C6Z06's. They are blowing up left and right...............just my fantasy I guess.
Vortech and Procharger.....take note ! LS7's are blowing up ........stop making compatible SC's immediately !
I'm not going to try and argue on which motor is best for Forced Induction.. I will say that Engineers at GM looked hard at a Forced induction Ls7 for the Zr1.. They did decide that the cylinder walls were to thin for reliability and durability issues,under Forced Induction. Smaller cubic inches and thicker walls were the answer.. A 427 Ls7 Supercharged ZR1 would have been great and a lot less $$$ for Chevrolet to develop and sell to the public.. The 7.0L LS7 block has quite a bit less cylinder wall thickness due to the larger bore, thus actually making it slightly weaker. They used the 6.2L block to make sure that the block could easily withstand the increased cylinder pressures of a forced induction engine. I'm sure that a low compression version of the LS7 would easily hold up under 10.5 lb. of boost, but GM has to think about long term durability for warranties, etc. so they erred on the side of caution. In addition, forced induction engines usually like a bore that is at least 10% over-square, meaning that the bore is larger than the stroke. The LS9 has a 4.065" bore with a 3.622" stroke, 12% over-square. The LS7 is a 4.125" bore with a 4" stroke, only 3% over-square.
Last edited by David426; Dec 27, 2011 at 11:00 PM.
Decided to go with the ls6 stroker 383. Installed and dyno 480rwhp. Anthony at LGM took care of the tune. Can't say enough good about LGM, good group of guys. Should be ready for trip to MSR Cresson first weekend in February.