When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm going with 15x10 and 15x4 I'm not sure yet the back spacing on the rears, but I believe it's 2.5" BS on the fronts. I'm using the MT 275 Pro rears and MT ET Drag front tires. Remember, I'm a track only guy.
Exactly.. So wouldn't you want to be able to fit a larger drag tire back there? Assuming there is 1.25" of room to extend outward and inward, a 64 offset would allow for a 12" wide rim and extend the same distance inward and outward. I know there is room for that and probably with any tire too. I need to go measure the total distance from the fender to the inner areas. This will give an idea of the total width tire that can be achieved. Then I can chose a rim width that will fit that.
MT says the max recommended rim for the 275 Pro is 9.5"
I gonna talk to a few ultra and X275 guys and see what width they're using. I may go 11" or even 12"
Ya I guess Im just confused. 275/60 is not a very big tire at all.. I mean the ET streets I have now are 26x11.5 which translates to 295/60. And there's literally 2.5 to 3 inches of space around the tire. Especially towards the inner wheel well. I plan to go larger for sure. Im not totally sure yet, but Im thinking Ill be fitting a tire with a section width of around 13" maybe?? which will need a rim thats 11-12" wide?? I would assume..
The MT 275/60 Pro is 28" tall which is hardly small.
It's also the best drag radial in existence.
Ron
This tire is a purpose built restriction for a specific class. It certainly is a good tire and Im sure it performs well. But there is better out there. Why limit himself if he doesn't have to? Here is what it says on MT's site: http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/s...treetRadialPro
Besides.. the ET "Street" was always a DOT street legal tire. Now its not while retaining the name ET Street. Not very well thought out in that area..
And anyone with a lowered vehicle will have to raise it back up to accept the 28.2" diameter.
Now I dont know about the compound in this one, but here is just an example of a 26" tall tire with 12" of actual tread on the ground that fits a 10" rim. Im just saying. There are a lot of options out there. http://www.mandhtires.com/M-H-Racema...5#.U71Kn_ldWCo
The taller the tire, the less effect the gears have. Ive heard its best to stay with a smaller diameter if possible.
Alrighty, Ive done a bit more research and found whats out there and the options. Its surprising how few sizes of tires there are to choose from in a certain diameter etc. for a given width rim. I realize now that a 10" rim accepts a pretty big tire when it comes to drag slicks, unlike street tires.
Should be fine with 1" difference between the front and rear if I remember correctly?? Something about the TC system. Not that Id be using it anyway. There is a 24"x4.5" option in this front runner too.
Now heres where I have questions. I am trying to consider the correct backspace. I can choose either 7 or 8 inches for the rear rim. The stock wheels are 18x9.5 with a 7.5" backspace. So if Im doing the 10" wide and used the 7" back space, that would in effect push the tire outwards while deepening the dish?? And the 8" a little inwards (tucking the tires under towards the body)?? Am I on the right track, or do I have it backwards?
The 24" front is really short and looks funny. I would probably use the 25". Currently I have the 26", but next time I buy fronts, I'm going with 25". It'll help a little with R/T.
You are correct in your assessment of the back spacing. If you have flared rear quarters, get the 7" BS. I would think they'd stick out too far with stock quarters. I'm getting the RT-S at 15x10 and 7.5" BS.
Good luck. The 2.0 is a really cool looking wheel.
The 24" front is really short and looks funny. I would probably use the 25". Currently I have the 26", but next time I buy fronts, I'm going with 25". It'll help a little with R/T.
You are correct in your assessment of the back spacing. If you have flared rear quarters, get the 7" BS. I would think they'd stick out too far with stock quarters. I'm getting the RT-S at 15x10 and 7.5" BS.
Good luck. The 2.0 is a really cool looking wheel.
Ya, I think the 25" is where it's at. I've debated tubbing or flaring in the back, but just going to fit these for now. At my power level I really dont need more. I think I will be fine with the 7" back space because my current ccw rear is right at 7.5" back space. This is basically the exact same size as I am currently running and I think I have plenty room for 1/2" more outboard.
But then again, if I do the 8" it will allow for future growth in tire size without flaring the fenders. I just would like to have a little more of a deep dish look. They look a lot better that way. But of course, practicality is more important than looks..