Reducing drag
I know areo is a difficult concept for a lot of people. But anyone with anything intelligent to say, I'd like to hear your insight.






I know areo is a difficult concept for a lot of people. But anyone with anything intelligent to say, I'd like to hear your insight.
The stick on spoilers can increase down force. But unless there has
been some R&D it's probably just to look pretty. The problem with wings is that they can increase drag rather than increase down force.
A wing has to be above the disturbed air coming off the roof. That's
why you see them high (and above the roof line) on many cars.
When I drag race I take the wing off because of the drag. When I
track race I reinstall the wing for downforce esp.. going around
curves. Just to make things more complicated--depending on the
length and how tight the track is I change the degree of the wing
from flat to as high as 10% off center. Why, for more down force.
It depends on what your car is being prepared for. Drag race, track,
autocross.
Another down force product is a diffuser and cunards. All to
increase down force, more grip is good.
Start reading aero literature , there is a lot to learn. Good luck.
But as I understand it, the drag behind vehicles in effect holds the car back a little right? So if I was able to basically "cut" through the air with less drag, the car would theoretically go faster right? Now I'm not sure a spoiler would help at all.. But if a simple lip off the back could help with this, I'd be interested. I'm not the type to do wings and body accents unless it's functional. So if I can justify a spoiler, I don't mind doing it..
http://www.fastracecars.com/categori...rvette-10.html
http://funny-pictures.picphotos.net/...Bcorvette.jpg/
http://www.fastracecars.com/categori...rvette-10.html
http://funny-pictures.picphotos.net/...Bcorvette.jpg/
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Can anyone verify that those are specifically for parachutes? Seems like shoot or not, the drag should be reduced with something coming off the back like that.
A good yarn test with a gopro can show you a bunch.
The factory had a wing type spoiler option availible for a while, which is copied by someone in the aftermarket. [ACI?] I wonder if GM did testing did testing on that.
Really? for most of us its about the look if we are honest. Serious racers excepted of course.
If putting on a long flat spoiler brings the point that the air from the top and bottom meet far enough back that it doesn't have a chance to suck up to the back of the vehicle.. Won't that mean it's cutting through the air better?
The point of this of course is to have a lower coefficient of drag down the drag strip. But if I can see less dirt build up or possibly a difference in instant fuel economy read outs after some testing, then it would be a safe bet that the car is now more aerodynamic right?
If putting on a long flat spoiler brings the point that the air from the top and bottom meet far enough back that it doesn't have a chance to suck up to the back of the vehicle.. Won't that mean it's cutting through the air better?
The point of this of course is to have a lower coefficient of drag down the drag strip. But if I can see less dirt build up or possibly a difference in instant fuel economy read outs after some testing, then it would be a safe bet that the car is now more aerodynamic right?
The GoPro and yarn sounds like a good idea to me.
APR is a pretty good company and has wind tunnel results to back up their claims if you search around the site. This one in particular is designed to reduce drag, not so much for down force, which sounds perfect for a dragster. It's of course a light weight carbon fiber design.
I know the GTC-300 and 500 are popular road race wings for the C5 and C6. But I just dont need a high rise wing, and the cost is a lot more.
Wing:
http://aprperformance.com/index.php?...d=51&Itemid=44
Data:
http://www.aprperformance.com/index....sk=view&id=342
The big flat things you linked aren't actually spoilers. They're more "deflectors" really meant to keep the chute junk from creating turbulence and/or messing up the laminar flow.

But theoretically, if the wing is set to 0 AOA, it's not going to hold the car back much from top speed and allow it to pass through the air with less turbulence behind the vehicle. I don't know the facts, just the basics, that in effect, there's a force that's kind of pulling (I guess that's the drag) that's like several pounds of holding back force that the vehicle is dragging and that increases with the speed.
Supposedly the wing is designed to make the air travel over the vehicle in such a way that it reduces the effect of all the force that's behind the vehicle. So you would be faster with less drag right? Obviously to maximize the effects, a front splitter and ideally a rear diffuser would be used in conjunction. I'm not ruling them out. But interested in starting with the wing.
That's if it really does make sense to do so..
So if you angle a spoiler as such to minimize drag then it begs the question why do you have a spoiler in the first place if you're not generating any downforce with it?
Now bear in mind I'm still talking about spoilers. The things you linked really aren't spoilers. I would be curious to see their data which substantiates their claims. Without a lump of equipment back there, I can't see that such a device would help anything.
Like I said I'm defiantly not up to speed on all this nor am I arguing this. It just seems like the theory behind it. Looking for as much insight as I can find.












