When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I had heads/cam and exhaust installed on my 2002 coupe a month ago. We used a Comp cam and stock ported heads with FLP full exhaust. I gained 400.4 RWHP after the mods. I then installed LS1 Edit with 32lb injectors because the car was running lean. I only gained 8 more horespower by doing this. Do these numbers sound low?
That's a pretty tame cam. Low lift and duration is not aggressive. Get a more aggressive cam and you'll get about 10-20 more RWHP. I suggest the TR224 ;)
Atlanta Chassis Dyno did the install. The cam was recommended by the installer. He said it was the biggest cam he could install, and still pass emissions. He dynoed a stock car with the same FLP exhaust and there was an 9.2 RWHP difference in the cats vs no cats.
Atlanta Chassis Dyno did the install. The cam was recommended by the installer. He said it was the biggest cam he could install, and still pass emissions. He dynoed a stock car with the same FLP exhaust and there was an 9.2 RWHP difference in the cats vs no cats.
Some cars do well with no cats and some don't, just a chance you take. MTI uses cats on their 7.0L strokers b/c they get no significant gains w/out them.
Does these thing lope like a ****? I don't see how it's possible you have those durations.
In the non LT1 or LS1 world people talk about cams in both Advertised Duration, and Duration @ 0.050. Thats why the second set of numbers posted are so much wider than the first.
For example, my T1 cam from MTI is 280/280 advertised but only 221/221 @ 0.050.
For most purposes the 0.050 numbers are the ones you really care about.
I used to have that cam. Nothing compared to a B1 or T1. When I did that and the CNC heads, I picked up like 25 RWHP. Just after the install I had a 250 lb friend with me on the test run. The car felt the same before it went in.
Switched to the T1 and gained a LOT of power.
I'm planning on installing an NOS kit in the future. I've already purchased the kit from a friend that was used but cheap. He had it on an 2002 SS Camaro for about two months. The jets were installed in the air box. What is the best way to install the jets on a corvette?
As said above, he's quoting total duration numbers, not duration at 50 thousanths (like everybody else does). the 216/220 is what you want.
1) you using cats?
2) who's heads? the heads mean a lot. Bad heads = bad numbers. good heads = good numbers. specs, who ported them, flow numbers, etc all matter and you should know that kinda stuff
3) the cam is small, the lift is low. Go with a thunder racing 224 cam, or any other proven cam. You went small for good drivability, thats fine. Anything between 222-228 in duration with 550-570 lift on a 114 is probably about where you want to be
4) what RPM did your setup peak at?
5) automatic or manual tranny?
I hope you meant does NOT shake a lot. A cam with 114 lobe seperation angle shouldnt really have idle problems.
Eric
I have a TR with a 114 LSA and it does shake a little bit when the RPM's get around 500 or so...had to raise the idle on mine...LGM and Speedtek were surprised the car was having that much of a problem idling with such a "mild" cam. Now have it set to 800 for idle and it's fine. Can't imagine what a 112 would feel like.