Heads & Intake Swap = Low Compression
09-17-2018, 08:51 PM
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
Heads & Intake Swap = Low Compression
So I completed a heads and intake swap on my 98. Changed to 799 heads and LS6 intake. Connected everything back up, and it wouldn’t start. Low compression.
After a bit of research, we found that changing to the newer heads meant we should have changed to the 7.375” pushrods instead of reusing the 7.425” pushrods. We order up the new pushrods and installed them today.....same result.
Has anyone gone through this LS6 top end swap and come across this? Are we missing something? Need advise.
After a bit of research, we found that changing to the newer heads meant we should have changed to the 7.375” pushrods instead of reusing the 7.425” pushrods. We order up the new pushrods and installed them today.....same result.
Has anyone gone through this LS6 top end swap and come across this? Are we missing something? Need advise.
09-17-2018, 10:06 PM
#2
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 10,426
Received 1,261 Likes
on
1,056 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C5 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
are you positive it's due to low compression and not a fuel/spark issue?... did you attach the ground on the back of the driver side head?
09-17-2018, 10:13 PM
#3
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2018
Location: South Hill Wa
Posts: 6,979
Received 4,147 Likes
on
1,939 Posts
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2021 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Chris, I agree with Neutron. What makes you certain off the bat that you have low compression? I think you need to be investigating other avenues.
I'm sure you'll get this resolved in no time.
I'm sure you'll get this resolved in no time.
09-17-2018, 10:24 PM
#4
Drifting
Thread Starter
it has fuel and spark. We checked that first. Yes, I did attach the ground to the driver’s side head. We did a compression check and it only had 50 pounds.
09-17-2018, 11:02 PM
#5
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 10,426
Received 1,261 Likes
on
1,056 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C5 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
50 on all cylinders?... I would pull all the rockers and do a leak down test, that will tell you if they are holding pressure or not... if that checks out then move on to the pushrods, you should buy an adjustable pushrod tool and measure for the correct length
09-18-2018, 06:34 AM
#6
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Anthony TX
Posts: 32,736
Received 2,180 Likes
on
1,583 Posts
CI 6,7,8,9,11 Vet
St. Jude Donor '08
Pull the rockers and do a leak down test. You could have bent the intake valves. If pulling the rockers doesn't restore the cylinder pressures, be prepaired to pull the heads back off if pulling the rockers does not restore compression.
09-19-2018, 04:24 PM
#7
Race Director
Member Since: Apr 2017
Location: Hickory NC
Posts: 10,211
Received 863 Likes
on
667 Posts
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2020 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
St. Jude Donor '17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
Info about switching to the 7.375” pushrods is probably correct but it may be worth $10-15 to buy a pushrod length check tool; especially if you plan on other engine work later including cam swaps, lifter swaps, etc.
Hopefully the longer pushrods are just keeping the valves from seating and that the valves are not bent.
Good luck and hoping for an inexpensive fix.
Hopefully the longer pushrods are just keeping the valves from seating and that the valves are not bent.
Good luck and hoping for an inexpensive fix.
09-24-2018, 05:44 PM
#8
Pro
So I completed a heads and intake swap on my 98. Changed to 799 heads and LS6 intake. Connected everything back up, and it wouldn’t start. Low compression.
After a bit of research, we found that changing to the newer heads meant we should have changed to the 7.375” pushrods instead of reusing the 7.425” pushrods. We order up the new pushrods and installed them today.....same result.
Has anyone gone through this LS6 top end swap and come across this? Are we missing something? Need advise.
After a bit of research, we found that changing to the newer heads meant we should have changed to the 7.375” pushrods instead of reusing the 7.425” pushrods. We order up the new pushrods and installed them today.....same result.
Has anyone gone through this LS6 top end swap and come across this? Are we missing something? Need advise.
09-25-2018, 11:19 AM
#9
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Anthony TX
Posts: 32,736
Received 2,180 Likes
on
1,583 Posts
CI 6,7,8,9,11 Vet
St. Jude Donor '08
Any up-date on the issue??
Bill
Bill
09-25-2018, 01:19 PM
#10
Burning Brakes
Interested as well. I watched the video and that car had zero compression. Either every valve was bent (which I doubt since he had the springs off and would have assumed you could see if they were bent that bad), or it's some push rod issue. I would have liked to have seen the engine crank with the valve covers off to see if the rockers were allowing the valves to close. Other than those two things, I can think of nothing else it could be.
Last edited by Robrote; 09-25-2018 at 01:23 PM.
09-25-2018, 06:29 PM
#11
Burning Brakes
Good luck Chris. I follow you on YouTube, interested on your outcome. Hope you have her up and running soon.
09-25-2018, 08:49 PM
#12
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2018
Location: South Hill Wa
Posts: 6,979
Received 4,147 Likes
on
1,939 Posts
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2021 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
As Rob said, after seeing the video that car had zero compression from the get go of cranking it. Either the valves got bent from hand cranking the engine or the valves were damaged before installation.
I don't buy the push rod being too long possibility at this time. They would have to have milled a metric ton off of his 243 heads in order for it to have had that much effect on push rod length. I've run 7.40 push rods on stock 243 heads before with a decent sized cam.
Just rambling here, and dying to know the resolution. Sounds like it might be a bit longer before he can get to it.
I don't buy the push rod being too long possibility at this time. They would have to have milled a metric ton off of his 243 heads in order for it to have had that much effect on push rod length. I've run 7.40 push rods on stock 243 heads before with a decent sized cam.
Just rambling here, and dying to know the resolution. Sounds like it might be a bit longer before he can get to it.