Need real answer: Does removing the cat's increase power?
Where's the beef? :confused: :confused:
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


Joe
Sarcasm off.
Reality: A few gearheads yanking their cats to squeeze 5-10 hp aren't going to make any difference in the world's air. You want to clean up the air, plant a tree and get on your congressperson to start making POWER COMPANIES and INDUSTRY stop polluting so much.
I - to this day - still don't know how WE, the people, got saddled with the burden of cleaning the air by having our cars so squeaky clean while big business seems to have gotten off scot-free.
A car with removed cats pollutes as much as 100 cars with them working. The rules are the same for everyone, even hot-rod freaks. You cannot take them off legally and there's not that much to gain any way. You'd have to tune out for the O2 sensors and a bunch of other stuff in the process, so it just ain't worth it for a street driver.
Even SUV's and Trucks have to have cats and have to meet most of the same emission standards as everyone else.
Even diesels have cats today.
So don't take them off. If you want a car without cats, get a classic that never had them in the first place.
If you ever go to any major city at rush hour, you'll see exactly why our cars are burdened with pollution controls. There's millions and millions of them on the road.
Add to that, most Corvette owners drive there cars about HALF as much as the average SUV out there, and get about TWICE the mileage.
Then consider that production on the C5 Corvette is ~35,000 per year.
We could all gut our cats, and still pollute less than the SUVs.
Diesels don't put out as much HC's and NOx as gasoline engines to begin with, and don't benefit nearly as much from the cats as gasoline engines. But they put out a fair amount of particulate pollution.
"Not only do SUVs look like trucks, they pollute like trucks. SUVs are freed from fuel emissions standards that most cars have to meet. Minivans and SUVs spew 30 percent more carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and 75 percent more nitrogen oxides in the air than passenger cars. They also guzzle gasoline. The new super-size Ford Excursion, for example, gets about 12 miles per gallon. As a result, overall fuel economy for all passenger vehicles is at its lowest since 1980. "
http://speakout.com/activism/issue_briefs/1258b-1.html
"Most SUVs and pickups, and all vans, are permitted to emit 29% to 47% more carbon monoxide (CO) and 75% to 175% more nitrogen oxides (NOx) than passenger cars. "
http://www.idontcareaboutair.com/facts/emissions.shtml
:crazy:
[Modified by Tom Steele, 8:17 PM 12/11/2002]
[Modified by Mike Mercury, 9:18 PM 12/11/2002]
Everytime you post you use up large portions of the page quoting other people and directly confronting their opinions. I would suggest that you just clearly and concisely state your position on the subject and leave it at that.
I am not sure of any of your actual positions on things, only that you find excessive faults in others opinions. So in a purely defensive positioning I am not stating any opinions on this topic. :blueangel:
My cat's are gutted and I did see increased power, but there are enough high-perf. cats out there that will give you lower restriction and still be legal.
I have a pair to install next time I have the exhaust apart. (but I love the sound the way it is! :cheers:
Quickag, I have sen a few bolt on LS1's dyno before and after cats and the gain is small, almost negligable. Sully dyno'd before and after with his C5R engine and I think he said it was 5rwhp? maybe he'll pipe in here, so he decided to keep his cats.
If I were you I'd keep them. I'm keeping mine.




















