C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2003, 10:53 PM
  #1  
C5Coupe
Racer
Thread Starter
 
C5Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat

I am curious to know what the weight difference is between my Goodyear runflats in the front and a similar non-runflat? Does anyone know what is the lightest tire for the front in an OEM size? (not the skinnies)
Old 01-16-2003, 11:08 PM
  #2  
kewlbrz
Le Mans Master
 
kewlbrz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 7,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (C5Coupe)

If it helps, I just weighed a front 17 inch C5 EMT goodyear at 29 pounds with no rim.
Old 01-17-2003, 08:59 AM
  #3  
UtahVince
Pro
 
UtahVince's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Salt Lake City UT
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (C5Coupe)

Expect to save about 5 to 6 lbs per tire. My Nitto 555 front tire weighed in at 24 lbs.
Old 01-17-2003, 09:11 AM
  #4  
pburant
Burning Brakes
 
pburant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Manchester NH
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (UtahVince)

So it looks like in addition to the other benefits (please, no safety speeches - I realize what the advantages of a runflat are!), non-runflats will reduce your combined tire/wheel weight by about 10%. That's defintely good for a few virtual ponies.
Old 01-17-2003, 09:14 AM
  #5  
IMQUIK
Le Mans Master
 
IMQUIK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Kennesaw Ga
Posts: 5,266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (pburant)

You can save them extra ponies for the walk when ya have a flat. :jester
Old 01-17-2003, 09:29 AM
  #6  
kewlbrz
Le Mans Master
 
kewlbrz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 7,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (pburant)

So it looks like in addition to the other benefits (please, no safety speeches - I realize what the advantages of a runflat are!), non-runflats will reduce your combined tire/wheel weight by about 10%. That's defintely good for a few virtual ponies.
Thats true. And being rolling weight. Its worth more than dead weight.

Also, to note: 90 percent of the Z06's ~100 pound weight difference when compared to the coupe or ragtop, come from its lighter tires and exhaust.
Old 01-17-2003, 10:27 AM
  #7  
Avanti
Race Director
 
Avanti's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Bonneville Salt Flats, 223mph Aug. '04
Posts: 17,423
Received 5,216 Likes on 3,459 Posts

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (kewlbrz)

Yeah, and don't forget how much weight is saved on the Z06 by not having a rear storage cover!!! :lol:
Old 01-17-2003, 12:00 PM
  #8  
C5Coupe
Racer
Thread Starter
 
C5Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (kewlbrz)

Yes rolling weight reduction translates into a greater benefit than just removing dead weight. I am considering going to non-runflats, lighter rotors and possibly Corsa's titanium exhaust. This should increase 1/4 mile times and MPH.

I am currently using BFG drag radials on the rear for dragstrip use only, but keeping the runflats in the front. I think making the change listed above should help my ET.
Old 01-17-2003, 12:32 PM
  #9  
UtahVince
Pro
 
UtahVince's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Salt Lake City UT
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (kewlbrz)

Also, to note: 90 percent of the Z06's ~100 pound weight difference when compared to the coupe or ragtop, come from its lighter tires and exhaust.
Actually, I think it's closer to 150 lb diff between C5 and Z06 (3200 lbs vs 3050). The Z exhaust saves 18 lbs, the tires 23. Also, the Z has thinner windshield glass (5 lb). But the biggest weight savings is the lack of a huge, heavy hatch on the Z, compared to the standard C5.
Old 01-17-2003, 12:55 PM
  #10  
kewlbrz
Le Mans Master
 
kewlbrz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 7,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (UtahVince)

Actually, I think it's closer to 150 lb diff between C5 and Z06 (3200 lbs vs 3050). The Z exhaust saves 18 lbs, the tires 23. Also, the Z has thinner windshield glass (5 lb). But the biggest weight savings is the lack of a huge, heavy hatch on the Z, compared to the standard C5.
I guess we can look at it officially :) Here are the official numbers for 03. The difference was a little less in the 01 Z06.

From GM 2003:
Coupe 3246
Z06 3118

difference 128 pounds.

A better way to say it (and 90 percent that I said was a a little off ;) ) Is that the exhaust and tires are the biggest 2 chucks of the weight. To me the thinner windshield, is negligible. Also the convertible has less weight above the door line than the Z06 and a lot less than the coupe. The other savings to me come from less options.

Also, as an aside, im actually baffled that an equivalently opitoned ragtop "officially" weighs 2 pounds more than a coupe. Given that the difference is the coupes gigantic heavy back glass and hard shell top and roof panel, relative to the ragtops aluminum frame and cloth.



Also to the original author of this thread, i looked up some old threads, and saw that someone weighed runflats against nonrunflats of similar size and saw about a 5 pound savings.

Also that rotating mass is equal to about 4:1 dead weight. So for every 10 pounds of rotating mass saved, is equal to about 40 pounds of dead weight.


[Modified by kewlbrz, 2:02 PM 1/17/2003]
Old 01-17-2003, 01:03 PM
  #11  
adrnln1
Burning Brakes
 
adrnln1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (kewlbrz)

Here are the official numbers for 03. They were even closer to 100 in 01.

From GM 2003:
Coupe 3248
Z06 3118

difference 128 pounds.

I don't know, but with my "New Math" that is 130 pounds :lol: :steering:
Old 01-17-2003, 01:17 PM
  #12  
Jamn
Instructor
 
Jamn's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Yorba Linda, CA,,,USA
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (C5Coupe)

I don't know about the weight difference, but I switched to non-runflats a few months ago, and this has been an unblievable positive up-grade for this car. As for flats, I just carry a small compresser for slow leaks, and I guess I will have to flat bed it in the event of a blowout. Even on run-flats, I have been told that flats are not repairable.
Old 01-17-2003, 01:46 PM
  #13  
yellowvette837
Team Owner
 
yellowvette837's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,653
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru'19
Tampa Events Princess
2015 C6 of Year Finalist
I Believe In The Beer Fairy


Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (adrnln1)

Someone must have been sitting in the Coupe
:lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg:
Old 01-17-2003, 01:57 PM
  #14  
Joe’s Z06
Le Mans Master
 
Joe’s Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 7,157
Received 60 Likes on 35 Posts

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (yellowvette837)

Someone must have been sitting in the Coupe
:lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg: :lolg:
:lol: :lol:
Old 01-17-2003, 02:42 PM
  #15  
kewlbrz
Le Mans Master
 
kewlbrz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 7,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Cruise-In III Veteran

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (adrnln1)

Here are the official numbers for 03. They were even closer to 100 in 01.

From GM 2003:
Coupe 3248
Z06 3118

difference 128 pounds.

I don't know, but with my "New Math" that is 130 pounds :lol: :steering:

Ooops

I mis-put the number for the coupe, its 3246 as stated by GM. :crazy:
Old 01-17-2003, 07:18 PM
  #16  
AP
Team Owner
 
AP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Cleveland OH
Posts: 100,669
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (UtahVince)

Also, to note: 90 percent of the Z06's ~100 pound weight difference when compared to the coupe or ragtop, come from its lighter tires and exhaust.
Actually, I think it's closer to 150 lb diff between C5 and Z06 (3200 lbs vs 3050). The Z exhaust saves 18 lbs, the tires 23. Also, the Z has thinner windshield glass (5 lb). But the biggest weight savings is the lack of a huge, heavy hatch on the Z, compared to the standard C5.
:thumbs:
Old 01-17-2003, 07:58 PM
  #17  
C6~Missle
Le Mans Master
 
C6~Missle's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: N Carolina 08 Z51 Coupe
Posts: 5,411
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (AP)

don't forget the advantage of un-sprung weight. The ability to put the tire on the ground on rough road surfaces faster. This makes a huge difference in handling. Let's the shocks be more effective.
I take my chances.. so I enjoy the major performance increase 99.999% of the time.
In the event I do get a flat, I have a cell phone, air pump, mini jack and a plug.
mike :steering:

Get notified of new replies

To Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat

Old 01-17-2003, 10:24 PM
  #18  
C5Coupe
Racer
Thread Starter
 
C5Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (C5~Missle)

Un-sprung weight is a good point, how do you maximize it on a C5? Obvious more weight out of the car is better....usually in the front. Rotating weight is even better. So what can be done to help?
Old 01-17-2003, 11:41 PM
  #19  
Dave68
Race Director
 
Dave68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 19,299
Received 78 Likes on 50 Posts

Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (C5~Missle)

don't forget the advantage of un-sprung weight. The ability to put the tire on the ground on rough road surfaces faster. This makes a huge difference in handling. Let's the shocks be more effective.
I take my chances.. so I enjoy the major performance increase 99.999% of the time.
In the event I do get a flat, I have a cell phone, air pump, mini jack and a plug.
mike :steering:
I agree and suspect that the stiffness of runflat sidewalls contribute significantly to "bumpsteer".
Old 01-18-2003, 06:35 AM
  #20  
FXWG
Pro
 
FXWG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Aberdeen MD
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat (Dave68)

"Bumpsteer" So that's the feeling I get when I hit a bump in the road and my car tends to jump sideways? I hate that feeling. I guess I might have to switch from the run flats to the non run flats, buy an air pump and a plug kit.
Thanks,
[IMG][/IMG] :auto: :auto:


[Modified by FXWG, 11:36 AM 1/18/2003]



Quick Reply: Weight difference between runflat and non-runflat



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.