When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
BTr stage 3 cam. MAP reading is about 9 inhg at idle, and doesn’t appear to ever go above 20 inhg no matter load and RPM. When key is in ON position, it reads 29.63inhg. Shouldn’t I be seeing that reading at WOT?
This 9 inHG at idle... is this 9 inHG of absolute pressure or 9 inHG or vacuum?
It's my assumption these are absolute readings... 9 inHG is about 30 kPa which is lots of vacuum, definitely not right for a cammed motor. My 226/230 113 cam is around 50 kPa at idle.
What kind of gauge is this or are you reading the factory MAP? Aka how reliable do we think this is.
This 9 inHG at idle... is this 9 inHG of absolute pressure or 9 inHG or vacuum?
It's my assumption these are absolute readings... 9 inHG is about 30 kPa which is lots of vacuum, definitely not right for a cammed motor. My 226/230 113 cam is around 50 kPa at idle.
What kind of gauge is this or are you reading the factory MAP? Aka how reliable do we think this is.
I’m reading the factory MAP from the live data of my scanner. What would cause an engine to have too much vacuum?
What RPM is it idling at? If you had a big vacuum leak + high idle, it could read pretty low vacuum. Doesn't explain the issue at high load though.
Not sure what kind of scanner it is, but a quick data capture might help ID if anything looks amiss.
car idles at around 900-950. Sometimes when coming to a stop, or when I start it up again after it’s warmed up, it wants to die unless I modulate the throttle a little for a few seconds then it will smooth out and idle just fine. However I most definitely don’t feel a misfire when this is happening. I’ve never seen it idle higher than about 950 ever.
I’m reading the factory MAP from the live data of my scanner. What would cause an engine to have too much vacuum?
KOEO at sea level your BARO should read around 29.9 inHg or about 101 kPa…at idle to read manifold vacuum subtract MAP from BARO…29.63-9.00 equals 20.63 inHg manifold vacuum…as idle increases your MAP inHg should decrease…you will need to check the wiring on your MAP sensor…a 5 volt reference, signal, and a Low Reference (ground)…if your MAP inHg does not change you may have a bad MAP or bad ground…to check MAP you will need to disconnect the MAP and with KOEO you should see 5 volts on the reference wire…you can jumper the 5 volt reference to SIGNAL and you should see 5 volts on your scan tool reading MAP voltage…connect test light to B+ and probe the low reference…test light should illuminate.
KOEO at sea level your BARO should read around 29.9 inHg or about 101 kPa…at idle to read manifold vacuum subtract MAP from BARO…29.63-9.00 equals 20.63 inHg manifold vacuum…as idle increases your MAP inHg should decrease…you will need to check the wiring on your MAP sensor…a 5 volt reference, signal, and a Low Reference (ground)…if your MAP inHg does not change you may have a bad MAP or bad ground…to check MAP you will need to disconnect the MAP and with KOEO you should see 5 volts on the reference wire…you can jumper the 5 volt reference to SIGNAL and you should see 5 volts on your scan tool reading MAP voltage…connect test light to B+ and probe the low reference…test light should illuminate.
okay thanks. I noticed it seems to hit the highest number I’ll see (19 inhg or so) and doesn’t really fluctuate much if at all after that regardless of RPM and load. Hoping I just have a bad sensor/ loose connection. This is probably a dumb question, but could a bad Map sensor effect fuel trims?
Yes, the airflow model/fueling calculation are primarily from the MAF, but the speed density/VE model plays into it... incorrect MAP would really throw off that aspect of the fueling calcs.
Yes, the airflow model/fueling calculation are primarily from the MAF, but the speed density/VE model plays into it... incorrect MAP would really throw off that aspect of the fueling calcs.
Unless when it was tuned it was set to run on MAF only. Not a great choice, but one I've seen lazy tuners do.
Unless when it was tuned it was set to run on MAF only. Not a great choice, but one I've seen lazy tuners do.
little update. I switched the units of measurement to KPA for the MAP. I believe I had an issue with the scanner I was using. MAP Reading gets up to 97 under heavy acceleration, however I noticed as soon as I let off the gas, the readings drop all the way into the 20s for a second before jumping back up to 50-55. I’m assuming this is from a vacuum leak?
okay, thank you. Still trying to figure out my high fuel trims at idle only. Only on one bank.
High fuel trims only on one bank would not indicate a vacuum leak like an intake leak downstream of the MAF sensor which would be both banks…if the fuel trims decrease at 3000 RPM you may have an exhaust leak upstream on that bank of the front O2 sensor or an intake runner leak.