When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I never saw this thread last year but am in for the tune and part throttle results. Having become more familiar with cam specs and head flow charts recently, I have this odd thought in my head that cathedral port heads offer a lot more versatility and efficiency due to air velocity and that, truly, less is often more in ways such as the runners as mentioned. Rec heads flow some sick (intake) numbers, but they need more cr and lift to mask their lack of velocity so the image forming in my head is that the cath heads make better street rippers and the rec heads serve wot functions better (but need a lot of exhaust work).
I am currently running Speed Density (SD)… getting the VE table dialed in. After the VE table is tight I will reenable the MAF and go down that road.
The cam is relatively small (224/228-114+4). So I am getting great vacuum… 21+ inches at idle.
I have the VE table tuned-in pretty tight up to 4k-rpm.
My static is 10.9 to 1
My DCR is 8.47 to 1
..and Quench is right at .038
… so I am just inside using 93 octane.
… more on tuning to come.
Originally Posted by Tusc
I never saw this thread last year but am in for the tune and part throttle results. Having become more familiar with cam specs and head flow charts recently, I have this odd thought in my head that cathedral port heads offer a lot more versatility and efficiency due to air velocity and that, truly, less is often more in ways such as the runners as mentioned. Rec heads flow some sick (intake) numbers, but they need more cr and lift to mask their lack of velocity so the image forming in my head is that the cath heads make better street rippers and the rec heads serve wot functions better (but need a lot of exhaust work).
Sooo... a great driver, maxxing pump gas safety, strong mid-range for street or track fun, aaaaaand what... 440rw?
...hmmm... nah, I don't expect anything that high. I have done this a few times, like 15, on my cars and friends.
These combos normally hit 425-430 rwhp. Smaller cam's like this with medium intake runner heads (215 and below...) will get you 400+ rwtq, which is exactly where I wanted to be.
I purposely picked cam specs that landed the IVC event at 42-degrees ( @ .050 )... to keep the LS6 intake peak optimization, in ref. to rpm.
There are a ton of wild off the hook cams that punch higher rwhp, but they always show lower rwtq... like in the 370s. I have driven several and they are slugs below 3500rpms. Just not what I was aiming for. I drive the car daily.
My wideband died... so ordering a new one to tune-in WOT.
On another topic... did anyone take note of the factory cam pitting on the lobe? Scary to see it!!!
42 is a happy spot, pushes dcr, keeps the map and the tb happy and easy to tune, good throttle response and supports power under the curve. No arguments here. Sounds like a great street grind.
All our lives we chase ridiculous sized cams it seems. Only when we've been there do we realize, no, the lesser duration and mildly smoother lsa is what I want.
On another topic... did anyone take note of the factory cam pitting on the lobe? Scary to see it!!!
I’ve had a couple of pitted cams over the years, mine have usually been from spalling due to poor heat treating. With flat tappets I found the pits were eroding the followers. With other followers I found the surface bridged and didn’t erode. I would think rollers should do the same.
Both are solid. I have owned both. The best voodoo seems to be Tony Mamo or BTR worked heads as they focus on velocity and smaller runners which make the best option for all but a dedicated track-only car. Katech is still on that list as well.
Any reason not to buy AFR or PRC heads, I haven’t checked price, expensive?
AFR 215s are basically another $1150... maybe a little less depending on how much the vendor wants to discount.
... I have used AFRs in the past also... just don't see the extra 1k in performance.
Katech builds the engines used for the GM Corvette Racing team that dominated the U.S. and global GT racing circuits for decades... that is enough for me.
Last edited by Pipedream; Jan 28, 2026 at 07:42 AM.
IVC within a half a degree of the cam I have on the shelf, only 3 fewer degrees @ .050" on the intake lobe. . . but with 10.5 degrees less overlap. Yeah that should be a very easy cam to tame. Are you logging g/s of airflow? Probably not with the MAF off, but the PCM will still calculate it regardless.