When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have read on previous posts that GM considers consumption of one quart of oil per 2000 miles to be normal if you have a 6 speed and spend a lot of time in the higher RPM range. Would this also be true for a car with the 4 speed automatic transmission, and the 3.15 rear end, that is mainly driven on short trips? Thanks, I just got surprized by the low oil alert for the first time. Am I unreasonable to think there should be no oil consumption or is this just the nature of a high performance engine?
I think it is reasonable to expect no oil consumption. Just because it is a high performance engine does not mean it has to burn oil.
I am lucky, my car will not burn a drop of oil. I take it to the track, hit the rev limiter, keep oil in for 5000 miles and no change in the level, no oil added. I think it is a design flaw of the pistons and rings on pre-2002 cars.
Nope can't blame it on pre-2002 Vettes. Mine is a '00 FRC, 6spd, 39.5k, daily driver, hasn't used any oil between 4k mile oil changes--I check weekly. I bought used, but know the previous owner didn't thrash the car. I run through the gear box on occasion, the occasional run up in the rev range, but mostly just spirited driving once in a while.
Unfortunately, the fact that oil consumption is a "luck of the draw" is sad. My guess is that most don't abuse their Vettes, as it seems that many rarely drive them at all.
I think it is reasonable to expect no oil consumption. Just because it is a high performance engine does not mean it has to burn oil.
I agree! GM can do it, just look at my LT1 Firebird, even with a bit of oil leaking out of the intake manifold, I still only consume one quart every 7k! If I fixed the leak, the consumption would be almost nothing most likely, and I drive this car very hard (lots of full throttle everyday, monthly trips to the dragstrip, etc.)
When I owned my LS1, it used less than 1/8th quart of oil every 3k. I drove that one even harder (went to the dragstrip a lot more often and made way more passes each time too) So if my 98 LS1 didn't burn oil, why do so many newer LS1s do it?
Are any 2003 owners having major consumption issues, or did GM finally fix it?
A friend showed me a GM fix the other day that specified replacing one piston ring in the set. The fix didn't use the other rings in the set and didn't replace the bearings either. Not what I'd call a good fix but there was a comment about the M6 and RPMs above 3500 on a continous or frequent basis.
The C5's may consume oil if you drive at high speeds at a low gear. Since you have an auto, you may want to pull out more slowly when the engine hasn't been running ( i.e. sat overnight)
But technically speaking, there is no oil consumption issue.
Try to keep a log of your driving habit and the weather conditons. These can affect your C5 consuming oil. You may alos want to change the oil and put a new filter on. The oil itself may have lost its properties to perform its best.
If you think its consuming too much, you can always take a triop over to your mechanic or friendly Chevrolet service deartment to have a look see.
2001 LS1 engines are very well know to be oil chuggers. Do a search on the the topic and you'll find some owners had new piston rings installed by the dealer (paid by GM).
I have an 01 Vette 6-spd with 10k that is using a quart about every 700 miles. It is scheduled for a re-ring. I had a '99 Camaro SS with 21k and the same LS1 engine and it didn't use any oil between changes. I have a 2000 Vette that I just bought used with 20k on it and my fingers are crossed!