When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a friend who owns a Magnum Hemi. It has the DOD system and he says you can't tell it by driving the car. He's a car guy so he would know if it was noticable. Of course it still doesn't get as good of mileage as my stock C6 with the A4 and optional 3.15 rear.
It's MDS (Multiple Displacment System) and in conjunction with gearing it would probably enable GM to add horsepower and avoid the Gummints gas guzzler tax. IF I keep my foot out of my '05 300C I can get around 17 City / 27 Hwy out of her. Of course, I don't usually baby it, so real world is around 15/23. Still not bad for a 4200lb brick of a 4 door sedan. With the Borla catback I can tell when it switches to MDS, but only if the radio is on low volume and I'm listening for it. Of course if GM tries it, they'll likely screw it up. So it may be best if they try it on other models first.
Definitely a fact. I have a neighbor whose friend has a cousin, whose boss has a neighbor, whose daughter is dating a guy whose barber has a sister and she knows somebody who used to work for GM............ And they say that its definitely true.
the LS2 was a work of art in "simplicity of effective design"
So the question becomes why would these new engines be superior other than a mild horse power increase or DOD.
What does the new engine weigh? What about new Weight / HP ratios?
What about delay in DOD. I imagine the timing will be more agressive on a vette. But a 1/10 second delay is still a 1/10 second delay on the track! Even something as small as a 1/50 second delay is critical to some gear heads.
What about complexity and service issues with a new larger engine?
I hope there's more than just a 0.2L displacement increase. With GM's pushrod V6s getting VVT and the direct injection in the turbo 2.0L Ecotec for '07 and 3.6L V6 for '08, I would hope the next Corvette engine to get some or all of this technology for more power and efficiency.
All these improvements are at the cost of wieght/hp. Sure you can turbo charge a 4 banger with VVT and get it to kick out 300 HP/300ftlb. But at what cost? Look at the complexity. And what does that sucker weigh. And what does the power curve look like? Is it mostly flat and linear? And I bet it's gas milliage isn't spectacular either.
Complex valve arrangements also take up valuable engine space.
So the question becomes why would these new engines be superior other than a mild horse power increase or DOD.
Regardless of the technology used, the efficiency of the engines must be increased or the gas guzzler tax will kick in when the CAFE minimums are raised. The C6 is currently .1 MPG over the current CAFE minimums.
Originally Posted by DigitalGriffin
What about delay in DOD. I imagine the timing will be more agressive on a vette. But a 1/10 second delay is still a 1/10 second delay on the track! Even something as small as a 1/50 second delay is critical to some gear heads.
My understanding is DoD activates in 1 cycle of the engine. That should put the delay in the sub millisecond range.
All these improvements are at the cost of wieght/hp. Sure you can turbo charge a 4 banger with VVT and get it to kick out 300 HP/300ftlb. But at what cost? Look at the complexity. And what does that sucker weigh. And what does the power curve look like? Is it mostly flat and linear? And I bet it's gas milliage isn't spectacular either.
Complex valve arrangements also take up valuable engine space.
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
I don't know about VVT, but DoD is a very simplistic change. When operating in 4 cylinder mode, the intake and exhaust valves are closed so the shutoff cylinders behave like springs. The GM implementation of DoD requires about $100 to implement with the lifters being the only significant modification.
The C6 is currently .1 MPG over the current CAFE minimums.
That doesn't make sense to me. The way I understand it, CAFE stands for corporate average fuel economy, so there is no magic number that the car needs to meet. If GM discontinued another car with worse mileage, then they wouldn't be barely squeaking by.
That doesn't make sense to me. The way I understand it, CAFE stands for corporate average fuel economy, so there is no magic number that the car needs to meet. If GM discontinued another car with worse mileage, then they wouldn't be barely squeaking by.
You are correct. The CAFE penalties do apply to the entire fleet for a corporation. However, the Energy Act's Gas Guzzler tax does not. This tax is per model, per model year.
Both laws have a magic number. CAFE minimums are 27.5 MPG per manufacturer. For the Gas Guzzler tax, the minimums are 22.5 MPG per model. The Vette is at 22.6 MPG combined city & highway. Great economy for a 400HP sports car, lousy economy compared to the average passenger car.
... and Tahoes and a number of others. Seems like they have it mastered this time. However, I'll be content with my traditional V8 LS2! Can't complain one bit about the mileage for a car with 400 horsepower!
GM tried this once already. Doesn't anyone remember the Cadillac V8-6-4? I don't remember much about it except that it was a dog.
Wright bros didn't impress any people standing around that day needing to get from Kitty Hawk to Charlotte in a hurry that very afternoon, but sometimes with a bit of perserverence...
You are correct. The CAFE penalties do apply to the entire fleet for a corporation. However, the Energy Act's Gas Guzzler tax does not. This tax is per model, per model year.
Both laws have a magic number. CAFE minimums are 27.5 MPG per manufacturer. For the Gas Guzzler tax, the minimums are 22.5 MPG per model. The Vette is at 22.6 MPG combined city & highway. Great economy for a 400HP sports car, lousy economy compared to the average passenger car.
Yeah, we don't want to hit Gas Guzzler status. The Viper has a $3000 hit added to the sticker.
I would guess L92 heads would be worth a good 30-40RWHP over stock LS6/2 heads, an aluminum 6.2L block is also in the parts bin now .
That's quite a jump. Are you sure? Are there any major improvements or just incremental improvements in the ports and comb chamber? (which is still a good thing)
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.