NPP Controller Concerns
The system appears like it is unprotected: no sign of fuse, and no sign of reset button as when there is a electronic circuit breaker present.
The other circumstance I noticed was the complete lack of any manufacturer's name or contact info.
Since this mod IS a MODIFICATION and would therefore void any warranty work by GM, and hopefully such VOIDING would apply only to the whole NPP system, the question begs - is anyone else concerned with these circumstances?
Your comments and/or suggestions would be appreciated. Robert
Legally, a manufacturer has to prove that an aftermarket device caused a failure in order to void a warranty. That doesn't mean they can't make your life miserable in the process though, or turn it into a court battle. But with this simple little device, I'd simply remove it before taking the car to a dealer for any repair work.
If I decide to install this I believe I will add in an inline 10 amp fuse with serviceable fuse holder. That would be because the factory 10 amp fuse must be removed for the mod plug to connect.
As to the comment about third party, or non OEM part installs, that is definitely a favorite topic of mine. The reason is, as you alluded to, it kind of concerns the whole question of GM's warranty, and because my Z is a 2011, and because I'm not a zillionaire, I kinda still care about that warranty.
I appreciate the fact that no one yet has had a problem with the controller, but who knows what the future holds. Worst case scenario, a short circuit in the wiring happens, and stuff happens, and because there is no fuse, either the butterfly valves heat up, or the wiring heats up and begins a burn, and that burn could be pretty close to El Gas Tanko. Anyway, yea, we all have auto insurance, but trust me when I say that a huge catastrophic claim might be just enough to motivate the auto insurance company to wonder why it wasn't a GM warranty problem, and in any event, if your auto insurance company learns that you modified the car with a mod that required removing the original fuse, and had no fuse of its own - well, you know how insurance companies and attorneys are, huh.
Now, one comment here concerning the federal law on third party supplied part replacements is a very interesting one, but very confusing as well, and everyone has a differing opinion much to my chagrin. Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (Magnuson has no relation to the super charger company) The Act was sponsored by Senator Warren G. Magnuson of Washington and U.S. Representative John E. Moss of California.
I am not an attorney, but I did read the act, and have read my GM warranty. These are my conclusions and opinions, and I do not desire to become embroiled in an argument, but only desire to share my opinions. Your opinions may vary, and I will respect each of them, and hope to learn from them.
Important points: The federal act relates to replacement parts that are made by third parties, and not by the subject car company. Thus, if you replace a part like a power steering pump with a third party pump with either identical or very similar specifications, then GM or the car company may have difficulty voiding a warranty. However, if you replace that pump with a pump that does not have identical or near identical specifications and it produces 20 pounds MORE of pumping force and blows out the power steering pistons, then the subject ACT would not apply or protect you from GM or car manufacturer from voiding the warranty on that equipment.
In the instance of the NPP controller, that is a 100% mod, and NOT a third party replacement part because it is not replacing a GM controller at all. So, the federal act would not cover such, IMHO.
Just to make it even more difficult, in my 2011 GM warranty book, they state plainly that ANY MOD will void the warranty. They also define when it is appropriate to replace a part with an equal non GM part. And, they say when no dealer is in the area, and give other exceptions.
Any thoughts and comments are always appreciated. Thanks again! Best, Robert
Last edited by soulcoaxing; Dec 1, 2010 at 09:55 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I'll check it out more closely. Thank you, Robert
My under $10 NPP solution:
What I did was buy a switch like this ($1.98):

Wired it with an "add-a-fuse" circuit from the local auto parts store (6 bucks). And mounted it someplace easily accessible, impossible to switch accidentally, and stealthy (i.e. you can't see this switch unless you crawl on the floor to look under the dash and physically impossible for me to accidentally switch it with my knee):

No complexity, no battery drain, and can be removed in a few minutes if necessary for some reason.
Just a thought for you. And since I tweaked my back bending down there to take the darn photo, I'm going to share it everywhere I can!
Last edited by DigitalWidgets; Dec 1, 2010 at 11:04 AM.
My under $10 NPP solution:
Just a thought for you. And since I tweaked my back bending down there to take the darn photo, I'm going to share it everywhere I can!

over for having loud exhaust.






Fortunately, any MTW system is easily removed when going in for warranty work.






My under $10 NPP solution:
What I did was buy a switch like this ($1.98):
Wired it with an "add-a-fuse" circuit from the local auto parts store (6 bucks). And mounted it someplace easily accessible, impossible to switch accidentally, and stealthy (i.e. you can't see this switch unless you crawl on the floor to look under the dash and physically impossible for me to accidentally switch it with my knee):
No complexity, no battery drain, and can be removed in a few minutes if necessary for some reason.
Just a thought for you. And since I tweaked my back bending down there to take the darn photo, I'm going to share it everywhere I can!

Very occasionally I will hit it by accident, but turning it back off is instantaneous.
SECTION 27200-27207
27200. (a) The Department of Motor Vehicles shall not register on a
dealer's report of sale a new motor vehicle, except an off-highway
motor vehicle subject to identification as provided in Division 16.5
(commencing with Section 38000), which produces a maximum noise
exceeding the applicable noise limit (82 decibles) at a distance of 50 feet from the centerline of travel under test procedures established by the Department of the California Highway Patrol.











