When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm having the famously flawed Harmonic Balancer replaced in my '05 (22.5K miles), my question is has anyone replaced theirs with another OEM GM unit? I called 2 local well respected shops and asked about the ATI unit, they both said to use the OEM unit as GM had fixed the separation problems and the replacement units work just fine. Cost (although not a factor) in considerably more for the ATI piece. Thanks, I'll also be asking this question in the Tech section.
Sure, many have replaced a faulty harmonic balancer with another factory unit. I'll venture to say the majority of people continue to use OEM parts. I don't know where your 2005 VIN falls-in but as you likely know, the early VIN 2005's were supposedly more widely affected by this problem. To remedy the problem GM introduced a friction washer as a harmonic balancer production part in the 2006 LS2 and LS7 engines. I suspect this was also the 'fix' with late model 2005's as well. I think the chances of a second, factory crank-pulley failing are slim but obviously, going with a better product could only help. The only sure-fire cure would be to pin the crank (why GM ever abandoned the keyway and went to a press-fit damper I'll never know). Good luck whichever way you go.
I had to get the harmonic balancer replaced on my '10 GS back in June '12. Obviously GM is continuing to put a bad design on the engines. Why? Mine was done under warranty. Most likely replaced with an identical unit...
Sure, many have replaced a faulty harmonic balancer with another factory unit. I'll venture to say the majority of people continue to use OEM parts. I don't know where your 2005 VIN falls-in but as you likely know, the early VIN 2005's were supposedly more widely affected by this problem. To remedy the problem GM introduced a friction washer as a harmonic balancer production part in the 2006 LS2 and LS7 engines. I suspect this was also the 'fix' with late model 2005's as well. I think the chances of a second, factory crank-pulley failing are slim but obviously, going with a better product could only help. The only sure-fire cure would be to pin the crank (why GM ever abandoned the keyway and went to a press-fit damper I'll never know). Good luck whichever way you go.
Couple of things. The problem you referenced to the early 05's is totally different than whats been happening to everybody. My 05 is below the cutoff # and when I had my HB replaced the bolt was not loose. Pinning the crank would not have and will not make any difference. The balancer is the defect not the way its installed on the crank. If the crank had been pinned at the factory and had the used the diamond washer on the bolt we would all (not just 05) still be having this problem.
I'm having the famously flawed Harmonic Balancer replaced in my '05 (22.5K miles), my question is has anyone replaced theirs with another OEM GM unit? I called 2 local well respected shops and asked about the ATI unit, they both said to use the OEM unit as GM had fixed the separation problems and the replacement units work just fine. Cost (although not a factor) in considerably more for the ATI piece. Thanks, I'll also be asking this question in the Tech section.
I have replaced mine and several others with the factory replacement hb and had it fail again in 4,ooo miles. pay me now or pay me much more a little later. do you want to go thru that again?pay the extra money for a little extra insurance against future failures. I have never heard of an ATI UNIT FAILING THAT WAS PROPERLY INSTALLED.
Couple of things. The problem you referenced to the early 05's is totally different than whats been happening to everybody. My 05 is below the cutoff # and when I had my HB replaced the bolt was not loose. Pinning the crank would not have and will not make any difference. The balancer is the defect not the way its installed on the crank. If the crank had been pinned at the factory and had the used the diamond washer on the bolt we would all (not just 05) still be having this problem.
That's the way I thought it was too, the bolt that holds the pulley (HB?) into the crankshaft is fine, it's the 2 piece assembly that's separating at the rubber that's the problem. And my car is #31K of about 35K produced that year so I would hope any early problems would have been corrected by then...thanks!
I have replaced mine and several others with the factory replacement hb and had it fail again in 4,ooo miles. pay me now or pay me much more a little later. do you want to go thru that again?pay the extra money for a little extra insurance against future failures. I have never heard of an ATI UNIT FAILING THAT WAS PROPERLY INSTALLED.
I get the impression that the new balancer design (and new part number) only became available about a year ago. If that is correct, then any car made before then or any balancer replaced before then, would be the old bad style.
It appears that the aftermarket units do not have the rubber bonding between two parts, but GM is still doing the new design units that way. There must be a reason, does anyone know why?
my 07 is at the dealer now getting the HB replaced with only 27,300 on the clock. I was going to go with an aftermarket HB but a few people on here told me to talk to a dealer and see if they would help out since this is a known issue. GM is covering a percentage of the repair (car is out of warranty) and my cost is less than what I would have paid a non dealer to install an aftermarket HB. The part is covered with a 1 year/12,000 mile warranty.
I am supposed to pick up the car today and I will find out the part # they used.
I took it to Rydell in Northridge and so far they have been the best dealership I have ever dealt with. They were supposed to have it done yesterday but were really busy and could not finish it. From what I was told the Corvette mechanic was supposed to be off today but he said he would come in to finish my car. If that is true then that is really cool of him.
my 07 is at the dealer now getting the HB replaced with only 27,300 on the clock. I was going to go with an aftermarket HB but a few people on here told me to talk to a dealer and see if they would help out since this is a known issue. GM is covering a percentage of the repair (car is out of warranty) and my cost is less than what I would have paid a non dealer to install an aftermarket HB. The part is covered with a 1 year/12,000 mile warranty.
I am supposed to pick up the car today and I will find out the part # they used.
I took it to Rydell in Northridge and so far they have been the best dealership I have ever dealt with. They were supposed to have it done yesterday but were really busy and could not finish it. From what I was told the Corvette mechanic was supposed to be off today but he said he would come in to finish my car. If that is true then that is really cool of him.
I get the impression that the new balancer design (and new part number) only became available about a year ago. If that is correct, then any car made before then or any balancer replaced before then, would be the old bad style.
It appears that the aftermarket units do not have the rubber bonding between two parts, but GM is still doing the new design units that way. There must be a reason, does anyone know why?
I was wondering about that too, why would GM continue to use an older (and obviously inferior) two piece design when the better aftermarket ones are mostly one piece without that rubber elastomer in the middle....do the two piece ones reduce vibration, is the rubber suppose to diffuse the engine vibrations? And does that mean the one piece units transfer vibration more noticeably? Hoping someone has an answer....
Sure, many have replaced a faulty harmonic balancer with another factory unit. I'll venture to say the majority of people continue to use OEM parts. I don't know where your 2005 VIN falls-in but as you likely know, the early VIN 2005's were supposedly more widely affected by this problem. To remedy the problem GM introduced a friction washer as a harmonic balancer production part in the 2006 LS2 and LS7 engines. I suspect this was also the 'fix' with late model 2005's as well. I think the chances of a second, factory crank-pulley failing are slim but obviously, going with a better product could only help. The only sure-fire cure would be to pin the crank (why GM ever abandoned the keyway and went to a press-fit damper I'll never know). Good luck whichever way you go.
You say the same thing every time Mr. Wayne O.
Just curious, the "friction washer" or in other posts - some time, diamond embedded washer, you refereed to, did you personally verified, it is a stand alone washer or just based on hearsays? Please elaborate.
For your info, there are quite a few have experienced with fail repeat OEM damper replacement reported.
Originally Posted by EVRose
Couple of things. The problem you referenced to the early 05's is totally different than whats been happening to everybody. My 05 is below the cutoff # and when I had my HB replaced the bolt was not loose. Pinning the crank would not have and will not make any difference. The balancer is the defect not the way its installed on the crank. If the crank had been pinned at the factory and had the used the diamond washer on the bolt we would all (not just 05) still be having this problem.
Precisely rebutted and I remembered your post on your recent Damper fiasco.
GM covered more of this repair than I thought. Thanks to Rydell for getting this done for me. they have a new customer!
That's the same part number I got on mine back in May of 2012 and I'm pretty sure it's the same number for years before that. Looks like they are still using the same part and not an updated one.
I get the impression that the new balancer design (and new part number) only became available about a year ago. If that is correct, then any car made before then or any balancer replaced before then, would be the old bad style.
It appears that the aftermarket units do not have the rubber bonding between two parts, but GM is still doing the new design units that way. There must be a reason, does anyone know why?
I assume it absorbs vibration better, or at least that would be GM's thinking.
My corvette tech says that the after market dampers get complaints on vibration.
Last edited by Boomer111; Jan 5, 2013 at 06:26 PM.