C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Feral Industries

Harmonic Balancer Replacement Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 09:07 AM
  #1  
RobLo's Avatar
RobLo
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 331
From: Long Island New York
Default Harmonic Balancer Replacement Question

I'm having the famously flawed Harmonic Balancer replaced in my '05 (22.5K miles), my question is has anyone replaced theirs with another OEM GM unit? I called 2 local well respected shops and asked about the ATI unit, they both said to use the OEM unit as GM had fixed the separation problems and the replacement units work just fine. Cost (although not a factor) in considerably more for the ATI piece. Thanks, I'll also be asking this question in the Tech section.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 09:31 AM
  #2  
B-Vette's Avatar
B-Vette
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 40
From: Edmonton Alberta
Default

NO, there are lots posts in some of the other harmonic threads from guys that had to do theirs a 2nd time, (and the odd post for a 3rd time).
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 10:15 AM
  #3  
Wayne O's Avatar
Wayne O
CF Senior Member
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,313
Likes: 25
From: Tucson Arizona
Default

Sure, many have replaced a faulty harmonic balancer with another factory unit. I'll venture to say the majority of people continue to use OEM parts. I don't know where your 2005 VIN falls-in but as you likely know, the early VIN 2005's were supposedly more widely affected by this problem. To remedy the problem GM introduced a friction washer as a harmonic balancer production part in the 2006 LS2 and LS7 engines. I suspect this was also the 'fix' with late model 2005's as well. I think the chances of a second, factory crank-pulley failing are slim but obviously, going with a better product could only help. The only sure-fire cure would be to pin the crank (why GM ever abandoned the keyway and went to a press-fit damper I'll never know). Good luck whichever way you go.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 10:26 AM
  #4  
Mad*Max's Avatar
Mad*Max
Race Director
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,025
Likes: 1,656
From: Toronto, Canada
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
Default

Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 10:27 AM
  #5  
Supercrewbear's Avatar
Supercrewbear
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 4
From: 34°0′34″N 95°30′53″W Indian Territory
Default

I had to get the harmonic balancer replaced on my '10 GS back in June '12. Obviously GM is continuing to put a bad design on the engines. Why? Mine was done under warranty. Most likely replaced with an identical unit...

Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 10:33 AM
  #6  
EVRose's Avatar
EVRose
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,475
Likes: 785
From: Las Vegas NV
Default

Originally Posted by Wayne O
Sure, many have replaced a faulty harmonic balancer with another factory unit. I'll venture to say the majority of people continue to use OEM parts. I don't know where your 2005 VIN falls-in but as you likely know, the early VIN 2005's were supposedly more widely affected by this problem. To remedy the problem GM introduced a friction washer as a harmonic balancer production part in the 2006 LS2 and LS7 engines. I suspect this was also the 'fix' with late model 2005's as well. I think the chances of a second, factory crank-pulley failing are slim but obviously, going with a better product could only help. The only sure-fire cure would be to pin the crank (why GM ever abandoned the keyway and went to a press-fit damper I'll never know). Good luck whichever way you go.
Couple of things. The problem you referenced to the early 05's is totally different than whats been happening to everybody. My 05 is below the cutoff # and when I had my HB replaced the bolt was not loose. Pinning the crank would not have and will not make any difference. The balancer is the defect not the way its installed on the crank. If the crank had been pinned at the factory and had the used the diamond washer on the bolt we would all (not just 05) still be having this problem.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 10:34 AM
  #7  
irok's Avatar
irok
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 508
From: Oshawa, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by RobLo
I'm having the famously flawed Harmonic Balancer replaced in my '05 (22.5K miles), my question is has anyone replaced theirs with another OEM GM unit? I called 2 local well respected shops and asked about the ATI unit, they both said to use the OEM unit as GM had fixed the separation problems and the replacement units work just fine. Cost (although not a factor) in considerably more for the ATI piece. Thanks, I'll also be asking this question in the Tech section.
I have replaced mine and several others with the factory replacement hb and had it fail again in 4,ooo miles. pay me now or pay me much more a little later. do you want to go thru that again?pay the extra money for a little extra insurance against future failures. I have never heard of an ATI UNIT FAILING THAT WAS PROPERLY INSTALLED.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 11:15 AM
  #8  
RobLo's Avatar
RobLo
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 331
From: Long Island New York
Default

Originally Posted by EVRose
Couple of things. The problem you referenced to the early 05's is totally different than whats been happening to everybody. My 05 is below the cutoff # and when I had my HB replaced the bolt was not loose. Pinning the crank would not have and will not make any difference. The balancer is the defect not the way its installed on the crank. If the crank had been pinned at the factory and had the used the diamond washer on the bolt we would all (not just 05) still be having this problem.
That's the way I thought it was too, the bolt that holds the pulley (HB?) into the crankshaft is fine, it's the 2 piece assembly that's separating at the rubber that's the problem. And my car is #31K of about 35K produced that year so I would hope any early problems would have been corrected by then...thanks!

Last edited by RobLo; Jan 5, 2013 at 11:17 AM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 11:16 AM
  #9  
RobLo's Avatar
RobLo
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 331
From: Long Island New York
Default

Originally Posted by irok
I have replaced mine and several others with the factory replacement hb and had it fail again in 4,ooo miles. pay me now or pay me much more a little later. do you want to go thru that again?pay the extra money for a little extra insurance against future failures. I have never heard of an ATI UNIT FAILING THAT WAS PROPERLY INSTALLED.
Thanks, that's what I was hoping to hear.....
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 12:25 PM
  #10  
Gearhead Jim's Avatar
Gearhead Jim
Team Owner
Supporting Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 25,015
Likes: 2,709
From: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
St. Jude Donor '13
Default

I get the impression that the new balancer design (and new part number) only became available about a year ago. If that is correct, then any car made before then or any balancer replaced before then, would be the old bad style.

It appears that the aftermarket units do not have the rubber bonding between two parts, but GM is still doing the new design units that way. There must be a reason, does anyone know why?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 12:54 PM
  #11  
Otherslost's Avatar
Otherslost
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 607
Likes: 11
From: Encino CA
Default

my 07 is at the dealer now getting the HB replaced with only 27,300 on the clock. I was going to go with an aftermarket HB but a few people on here told me to talk to a dealer and see if they would help out since this is a known issue. GM is covering a percentage of the repair (car is out of warranty) and my cost is less than what I would have paid a non dealer to install an aftermarket HB. The part is covered with a 1 year/12,000 mile warranty.

I am supposed to pick up the car today and I will find out the part # they used.

I took it to Rydell in Northridge and so far they have been the best dealership I have ever dealt with. They were supposed to have it done yesterday but were really busy and could not finish it. From what I was told the Corvette mechanic was supposed to be off today but he said he would come in to finish my car. If that is true then that is really cool of him.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 01:30 PM
  #12  
irok's Avatar
irok
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,807
Likes: 508
From: Oshawa, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Otherslost
my 07 is at the dealer now getting the HB replaced with only 27,300 on the clock. I was going to go with an aftermarket HB but a few people on here told me to talk to a dealer and see if they would help out since this is a known issue. GM is covering a percentage of the repair (car is out of warranty) and my cost is less than what I would have paid a non dealer to install an aftermarket HB. The part is covered with a 1 year/12,000 mile warranty.

I am supposed to pick up the car today and I will find out the part # they used.

I took it to Rydell in Northridge and so far they have been the best dealership I have ever dealt with. They were supposed to have it done yesterday but were really busy and could not finish it. From what I was told the Corvette mechanic was supposed to be off today but he said he would come in to finish my car. If that is true then that is really cool of him.
let us know if it is p/n 12635652
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 01:31 PM
  #13  
RobLo's Avatar
RobLo
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 331
From: Long Island New York
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim
I get the impression that the new balancer design (and new part number) only became available about a year ago. If that is correct, then any car made before then or any balancer replaced before then, would be the old bad style.

It appears that the aftermarket units do not have the rubber bonding between two parts, but GM is still doing the new design units that way. There must be a reason, does anyone know why?
I was wondering about that too, why would GM continue to use an older (and obviously inferior) two piece design when the better aftermarket ones are mostly one piece without that rubber elastomer in the middle....do the two piece ones reduce vibration, is the rubber suppose to diffuse the engine vibrations? And does that mean the one piece units transfer vibration more noticeably? Hoping someone has an answer....
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 03:50 PM
  #14  
Otherslost's Avatar
Otherslost
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 607
Likes: 11
From: Encino CA
Default

Originally Posted by irok
let us know if it is p/n 12635652
that is the part #.

GM covered more of this repair than I thought. Thanks to Rydell for getting this done for me. they have a new customer!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 04:26 PM
  #15  
orca1946's Avatar
orca1946
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,520
Likes: 536
From: Hampshire, IL
Default

My 2006 is on it's 2nd H B & is making noise AGAIN !!! I will talk to the dealer to see if they will replace FREE AGAIN ???
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 04:31 PM
  #16  
ricknyc23's Avatar
ricknyc23
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, Nassau County New York
Default

PM Sent....
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 05:58 PM
  #17  
victorf's Avatar
victorf
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Wayne O
Sure, many have replaced a faulty harmonic balancer with another factory unit. I'll venture to say the majority of people continue to use OEM parts. I don't know where your 2005 VIN falls-in but as you likely know, the early VIN 2005's were supposedly more widely affected by this problem. To remedy the problem GM introduced a friction washer as a harmonic balancer production part in the 2006 LS2 and LS7 engines. I suspect this was also the 'fix' with late model 2005's as well. I think the chances of a second, factory crank-pulley failing are slim but obviously, going with a better product could only help. The only sure-fire cure would be to pin the crank (why GM ever abandoned the keyway and went to a press-fit damper I'll never know). Good luck whichever way you go.
You say the same thing every time Mr. Wayne O.

Just curious, the "friction washer" or in other posts - some time, diamond embedded washer, you refereed to, did you personally verified, it is a stand alone washer or just based on hearsays? Please elaborate.

For your info, there are quite a few have experienced with fail repeat OEM damper replacement reported.

Originally Posted by EVRose
Couple of things. The problem you referenced to the early 05's is totally different than whats been happening to everybody. My 05 is below the cutoff # and when I had my HB replaced the bolt was not loose. Pinning the crank would not have and will not make any difference. The balancer is the defect not the way its installed on the crank. If the crank had been pinned at the factory and had the used the diamond washer on the bolt we would all (not just 05) still be having this problem.
Precisely rebutted and I remembered your post on your recent Damper fiasco.

Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Harmonic Balancer Replacement Question

Old Jan 5, 2013 | 06:13 PM
  #18  
EVRose's Avatar
EVRose
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 14,475
Likes: 785
From: Las Vegas NV
Default

Originally Posted by Otherslost
that is the part #.

GM covered more of this repair than I thought. Thanks to Rydell for getting this done for me. they have a new customer!
That's the same part number I got on mine back in May of 2012 and I'm pretty sure it's the same number for years before that. Looks like they are still using the same part and not an updated one.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 06:23 PM
  #19  
Boomer111's Avatar
Boomer111
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,999
Likes: 200
From: Bay Area Ca.
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim
I get the impression that the new balancer design (and new part number) only became available about a year ago. If that is correct, then any car made before then or any balancer replaced before then, would be the old bad style.

It appears that the aftermarket units do not have the rubber bonding between two parts, but GM is still doing the new design units that way. There must be a reason, does anyone know why?
I assume it absorbs vibration better, or at least that would be GM's thinking.

My corvette tech says that the after market dampers get complaints on vibration.

Last edited by Boomer111; Jan 5, 2013 at 06:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 07:16 PM
  #20  
B-Vette's Avatar
B-Vette
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 40
From: Edmonton Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer111
I assume it absorbs vibration better, or at least that would be GM's thinking.

My corvette tech says that the after market dampers get complaints on vibration.
Can he tell you which ones? I can't speak for ATI or SLP but I had no vibration on the Powerbond pulley that I installed on my old LS1 engine.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE