When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
After reading a post posted by JWSchmidt3 with a sketch on a concept(?) Vette that looked like a mid-engine, it got me thinking: Would the Corvette enthusiast go for a mid-engine design?? I'm sure this has been polled before, but humor me :cool: After finishing McLellans book, "Corvette from the Inside", I found it quite interesting how close we came to be driving mid-engine cars now!! Just a thought....
I wouldnt be totally against it one day, if they did it right.
But departing from history would be a bit of a sticking point for most people.
There's no point in it anyway. The engine sits so far back that it's almost mid-engined right now. 50/50 weight is nearly achieved as it is. We'd lose interior space and usable luggage area. Hell, even Enzo Ferrari firmly believed that the engine should be in the front.
But zora wanted it to be amid ship. Are you taking enzo's side!?!?!? Just kidding :) But even though the corvette engine is pushed back when you
look at the distribution of the mass you see a big hunk of mass up front
and a big hunk of mass out back (tranny), both separated by about 6 feet or so I guess. This is a relatively high polar moment of inertia. Now when you look at a F360 you see both the tranny and engine as an enormous hunk of mass just forward of the rear axle. This is a relatively low polar moment of inertia. The LPMOI will rotate more readily about its axis. Picture an ice skater babe spinning with her arms out, then as she pulls her arms in her velocity picks up. I think cars with more or their mass more centralized will be less sluggish to turn. This can also get you in a lot of trouble of course, but nowadays this can be mitigated with active handling when daily driving. When racing it would be nice to have the car more willing to rotate about its axis, but of course greater power comes greater responsibility and the need for more skill.
But zora wanted it to be amid ship. Are you taking enzo's side!?!?!? Just kidding :)
I'm taking what is both Enzo's side and also Bill Mitchell's side. Remember that Zora didn't like the mid-years and now they are (arguably) the most popular of the pre-1990's Corvettes.
This is a relatively high polar moment of inertia.
Yes, yes, I know quite a bit about the polar moment of inertia. But where the mass is in relation to the center of the car matters. The transmission in the 360 isn't any closer to the center of the car than the Corvette's. The engine is only slightly closer. The difference is that the Corvette will rotate less easily, but more naturally centered, whereas the 360 will rotate more easily (as the mass is concentrated) but will try to rotate around the rear tires, not the center of the car. Track numbers reveal the 360 slightly favoured in handling, but not by a lot.
Since I also own an MR2 I can say that there is just something about driving a car with the engine in the back - it's just so much more fun. The way they handle with a rear weight bias (not better, just different and even a little scary with the trailing throttle oversteer) and just hearing that engine scream from right behind your head is awesome. In fact my first comment I made about my 'Vette when I first bought it was: "I love it but they put the engine in the wrong spot."
Even though the 'Vette's engine is pushed pretty far back it is still slightly nose heavy and the engine would have to be set really far back like an
RX7 to be a front mid-engine car.
Not by definition.... When you say mid-engined, its generally inferred that the engine is over or slightly in front of the rear axle.... :yesnod: :cool:
Not by definition.... When you say mid-engined, its generally inferred that the engine is over or slightly in front of the rear axle....
Nope, Mid-engined is with the engine between the wheels. That runs from the centerline of the front wheels to the centerline of the rear wheels. Now you could have been more specific and have said rear mid-engine or defined it more by say the driver ahead of the mid-engine. But as it is the Vette already is mid-engined.
FYI, for anyone in northern California that might like to see a "midengine corvette":
From: Corvette Mike <info@corvettemike.com>
Subject: Corvette Informant July,13th Monterey Update
The NCRS National Convention is right around the corner, August 9-13.
The Board of Directors tells us that it is the largest National Convention
to date. That's exciting!! As one of the main sponsors of the event,
Corvette Mike, will have a prominent display area at the site. As part of
the display, thanks to Ralph Kramer, Tommy Morrison and Warren Mosler the
pole setting, ZO6 based, mid-engine MT900 Photon will electrify the crowds
at Fisherman's Wharf. This is the mid-engine Corvette that Zora would
have built, if he had his way. Judging will take place at the Monterey
Convention Center adjacent to the Doubletree Hotel. We still have a few
rooms left in our block for any last minute registrants. Reply to this
email for details.
The MT 900 is a VERY cool car....Dave McLellan devotes practically a whole chapter to it at the end of his book "Corvette from the Inside". If you are in this area and have the chance, I highly recommend going to see it. It's sure to be a sight. I wish I could go.... :rolleyes: I'm thinking that NC to CA would be quite some drive though.... :yesnod: :lol:
I would like to see not only a mid-engine vette, but something that rev'd to 8k rpm. I don't see why we can't get a hipo middy with great styl'n and handl'n for under $50k. BTW, wth aren't Cartek heads and cam a factory option? I'd really like to see an X-oriented 12 cylinder, with DOD, that takes less than 3 lateral feet, has 500 hp, revs to 8k and gets 25 mpg.