Auto-Up Windows?
Thanks!
Lew Shaw






Maybe if some of you wait long enough, the Vette will come with a built-in wet bar.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I wish someone who had the right skills would create and sell a hack to add this feature. It's just software, after all.



Kinda expensive though, $2500+ un-painted if memory serves.

SmoothLine.com $2700 in primer
Last edited by Knob Jockey; Nov 3, 2014 at 05:12 AM. Reason: More info-pic
Auto up windows can be dangerous, and therefore must adhere to federal regulations (specifically FMVSS 118 and other European regs). In a nutshell, auto-up windows require an "anti-pinching" function. The window computer can recognize an obstacle when closing, and then reverse. To implement this software function requires significant development efforts... And therefore cost.
I imagine that GM decided to not apply this feature to reduce the cost of the vehicle and provide maximum performance for the $. Of course many years later it seems strange this feature is not implemented when compared to competitors. It's my opinion that GM was attempting to produce the best performance bargain, and therefore had to cut a few corners here and there.
I was recently in a Ferrari 458 Italia and the passenger window had no auto-up function. The driver side did have auto-up, but no anti-pinching function. Yea, it hurt my hand figuring this out haha. I'm sure FMVSS 118 isn't the only reg Ferrari ignores

Anyways, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. However, I believe the C7 has auto-up. So that may be an alternative... albeit a pricey one.
I'm very certain Hall sensors are applied because the window computer needs to know position for the auto-drop function when one opens the door. Again, it requires some development effort to characterize the window system and guarantee the pinching force, durability, etc.
Auto up windows can be dangerous, and therefore must adhere to federal regulations (specifically FMVSS 118 and other European regs). In a nutshell, auto-up windows require an "anti-pinching" function. The window computer can recognize an obstacle when closing, and then reverse. To implement this software function requires significant development efforts... And therefore cost.
I imagine that GM decided to not apply this feature to reduce the cost of the vehicle and provide maximum performance for the $. Of course many years later it seems strange this feature is not implemented when compared to competitors. It's my opinion that GM was attempting to produce the best performance bargain, and therefore had to cut a few corners here and there.
I was recently in a Ferrari 458 Italia and the passenger window had no auto-up function. The driver side did have auto-up, but no anti-pinching function. Yea, it hurt my hand figuring this out haha. I'm sure FMVSS 118 isn't the only reg Ferrari ignores

Anyways, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. However, I believe the C7 has auto-up. So that may be an alternative... albeit a pricey one.
I'm very certain Hall sensors are applied because the window computer needs to know position for the auto-drop function when one opens the door. Again, it requires some development effort to characterize the window system and guarantee the pinching force, durability, etc.
I guess it never dawned on me holding the button up for the 3 or so seconds it takes for the window to go up would be that much of a concern for true sports car enthusiasts. Oh well - how times have changed.
I guess it never dawned on me holding the button up for the 3 or so seconds it takes for the window to go up would be that much of a concern for true sports car enthusiasts. Oh well - how times have changed.














