Ls3 vs L99 Differences

The last time GM ever called an Engine an L99 was when they made an optional "Baby LT1" for 94-96 Chevrolet Caprice Sedans
(I know that this is NOT a Camaro Forum, but I am discussing a Corvette Engine.)
Layout
•The L99 and LS3 engines are both built on the same platform, featuring 6.2L of displacement and eight cylinders. The camshaft of the L99 engine has slightly less duration than the one found in the LS3, giving the Camaro SS paired with this motor a smoother ride. The compression ratio of the L99 motor is 10.4:1, as the pistons have valve reliefs machined in the top halves of the pieces. The LS3’s compression ratio is 10.7:1.
Performance
•Consumers might favor the slight power increase in the LS3 over the L99, even though both engines demonstrate high performance values. The LS3 engine is rated and advertised with 422 brake horsepower and 408 lbs/ft of torque. The L99 engine has a slightly less horsepower output rating, as the vehicle is advertised with 400 brake horsepower and 410 lbs/ft of torque.
Transmission
•The basic difference between the L99 and LS3 motors is that each one was built for a specific type of transmission. The more powerful LS3 engine is paired with 2010 Camaro SS models that feature the manual transmission. Likewise, the L99 comes from the factory in automatic Camaro SS automobiles from the same year.
Fuel Efficiency
•Fuel consumption has become an important aspect to modern consumers when buying vehicles. Automobile companies had to completely redesign engines in order to maximize energy yet maintain performance values. Because both the L99 and LS3 engines share the same layout and many of the same parts, the fuel efficiency does not differ greatly between the two. However, the LS3 engine is advertised with an average of 16 miles per gallon in the city and 24 miles per gallon on the highway. The L99 is rated at 16 miles per gallon in the city and 25 miles per gallon on the highway.
Some Additional Differences w/ LS3 Engine
•L99 camshaft is different — having a little less duration and a little less lift, both of which give the engine a smoother idle.
•L99 has a cam phaser and, to get the additional piston-to-valve clearance required when cam phasing changes, the pistons are different parts having valve reliefs machined into their tops. The reliefs lower the compression ratio to 10.4:1.
•L99 PCV system is different having its oil separators in the valve covers rather than down in the valley like the LS3.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=DIFFERENCE+BETWEEN+LS3+AND+L99
Last edited by FloridaC6; Jan 4, 2018 at 08:51 AM.

The last time GM ever called an Engine an L99 was when they made an optional "Baby LT1" for 94-96 Chevrolet Caprice Sedans
(I know that this is NOT a Camaro Forum, but I am discussing a Corvette Engine.)

I recall another issue with the L99 involving the use of low octane gasoline triggering something computer based in the engine which substantially lowered performance until corrected.





LS3 is in the manual trans Tremec TR6060 cars, 426 HP
L99 is in the auto trans cars, 400 HP
Main difference is cylinder deactivation in the L99, cam, heads, comression are different from LS3
L99 is no slouch and actually when modded to remove the DoD but retain the cam phaser they can really scream. In stock form the cars run very similar times since the auto trans shifting itself makes up for the HP difference.
I can also tell you the LS3 is much more "fun" to drive especially when coupled with NPP that became available in 2013 in the Camaro.
Last edited by cadyshac; Jan 4, 2018 at 05:00 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts








