We need cheat codes





There is absolutly no need for you to belittle people here buy talking like a geek. Then responding with sarcasm!
You are like that annoying kid in high school who claims he's been there and done that.(One Upper)
If this is the case then lets see you DO it !
BTW I think your lunch money was stolen every day in High School!
The Above was ONLY Sarcasm!
Lets turn this into a productive discussion. I'll apologize first!
1. Whenever you use the NAV after the car has been turned off you must do an I Agree to not entering stuff while driving. Well I agree already. Now I need to find a way to turn it off.
2. I'm finding it hard to believe that there isn't a way to do MP3s,Denso made a big deal out of saying they could on their units.
3. DVD Movies... nuff said.
4. In respect to #1 I would like to be able to enter a destination while moving. Passengers can do that without endangering anybody. As a matter of fact, it is probably safer than arguing with the passenger as to where to pull over.
Someone out there must have some info on the Denso unit, and where to get program update disks or something.
Personally, I dislike most of the protect yourself against yourself laws. If monitors are illegal because they may distract you then stereo's, cell phones, cigarette lighters and spouses for that matter should be outlawed.
Let's say we don't want the disclaimer screen when we start our Nav system, or can't tolerate the limitation that prevents changes while moving, or hate the fact that the monitor can't play video DVDs. And let's say we're willing to lose any warranty service down the road on it (or not, if they provide a way to return the software to factory condition). (And while I'm adding features, why not the ability to connect an external video source, like a TV tuner?)
How much is it worth to you? $50? $150? $300? And at what price point will other C6 owners jump on the bandwagon? Are you willing to pay that amount before the software is written? Or do you want the inventor to front not only the time it will take to develop and test the software but also the money required for hardware, DVD burning, packaging, documentation, and shipping?
Let's say there are 1000 C6 drivers just like you, and you're all willing to pay $300 each. Sounds like a fairly good bounty for an enterprising software engineer. But what if there are only 25, each willing to fork over only $50? (Put me down for $50, shipping and handling included.
Let's give the car a chance to get more widely distributed and in the hands of tech-savvy users, and then figure out how much the annoyance factor of the "safety feature" really bothers you compared to what you're willing to pay to get rid of it.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
1) Is the disclaimer at startup IN ADDITION TO the inability to make changes while in motion? What's the disclaimer for then? Once you've said "Duh, OKAY, I'll keep my eyes on the road" why can't a passenger then play with the nav?
2) Is the XLR system really a different piece of hardware than the C6? You'd think GM, reusers of parts everywhere, wouldn't have bothered for two systems. But it seems that the XLR folks can play DVDs and MP3s and us C6ers can't do either. It also seems from what I've read that the Corvette's system is an EGA system (640x350x16 colors.) If this is the case then video is impossible... not enough color depth. Okay for displaying maps and radio stations, but not enough for video. From the shots I've seen on the Cadillac XLR web site, it looks like at least 4k if not better color depth. This would make the two units different at the hardware level.
3) I'd assume that firmware updates to the system would come via CD-ROM or more likely DVD-ROM. Set a special bit on the disc and the system says "hey, new code for me" and updates his onboard firmware. Sounds like this makes mp3 playback at LEAST a possibility? I find it hard to believe that GM would leave out the decoder logic in hardware since MP3 playback is SOOOO cheap nowadays with flash memory based players for a matter of a few bucks (with packaging, marketing, etc.)
I guess overall, I'm not looking for movie playback. I was warned about the loss of MP3 playback, but I'd pay for an upgrade/fix for that. Finally, there's gotta be a way to use the unit while in motion, assuming you can satisfy all the safety police. I have a Garmin StreetPilot III and I get the disclaimer at startup. I also have a setting on the menus to allow operation while in motion. I have to specifically set it to on. It stays that way between power cycles, but I still get the "eyes on road" disclaimer at every power up.
Thanks for taking the time and shedding some light my way!
Stephen
There is absolutly no need for you to belittle people here buy talking like a geek. Then responding with sarcasm!
You are like that annoying kid in high school who claims he's been there and done that.(One Upper)
If this is the case then lets see you DO it !
BTW I think your lunch money was stolen every day in High School!
The Above was ONLY Sarcasm!

Lets turn this into a productive discussion. I'll apologize first!


I won't be getting a C6 for at least three years. My '04 only has 14K miles on it. Haven't even broken it in yet. But first chance I get I will pull the docs on the nav and see if it is a firm ware or true OS loading system. True OS means an easy hack. Firm ware and all bets are off unless a flash can be done.
1) Is the disclaimer at startup IN ADDITION TO the inability to make changes while in motion? What's the disclaimer for then? Once you've said "Duh, OKAY, I'll keep my eyes on the road" why can't a passenger then play with the nav?
Thanks for taking the time and shedding some light my way!
Stephen
Personally, I dislike most of the protect yourself against yourself laws. If monitors are illegal because they may distract you then stereo's, cell phones, cigarette lighters and spouses for that matter should be outlawed.
I can say you're wrong because you are. What part of the text above are you confused about?
I can say you're wrong because you are. What part of the text above are you confused about?
This time I will address your original concern.
Every piece of software on the market today now has an EULA that specificialy states that the user has no legal right to reverse engineer, modify or copy any part of the products code. Doing so invalidates the EULA. Which means at that time you are no longer legally able to use the software. Further more when said EULA is revoked automatically (by modifying said software), the hardware that runs is also now in non-compliance of said EULA and is now no longer under any warranty expressed or implied.
I pulled this off of Garmins web site (Denso doesn't have software updates with disclaimers posted yet). This is the current standard phrase used:
"You acknowledge that this Software is the property of Garmin and is protected under United States of America copyright laws and international copyright treaties. You further acknowledge that the structure, organization, and code of the Software are valuable trade secrets of Garmin and that the Software in source code form remains a valuable trade secret of Garmin. You agree not to decompile, disassemble, modify, reverse assemble, reverse engineer, or reduce to human readable form the Software or any part thereof or create any derivative works based on the Software"
It goes on further to state that the EULA is revoked if you do any of that.
GM has no interest in this other than if the modification is found and they can reasonable prove that it caused the unit to fail, then they don't have to replace it under warranty. But if you think the laws that govern engine mods, cover software mods to a non GM product, you are sorely mistaken.
If you can prove me wrong on this, please do. I have a few projects I would love to be able to legally touch that at present I can't, due to the same exact issue as described above.





I can say you're wrong because you are. What part of the text above are you confused about?
This Skull guy clearly gets off on TRYING to sound like a prize scholar here!
We all know that we are not supposed to mod tamper with this ( This is a given) We are just curious on how to do it.
I also agee that people should not drive while watching movies there is enough distractions on the road!
Once again we are all looking for info here
NOT a pissing contest!!
NO one cares how big you think your cranium is!
For all we know you work at the tech desk at the local Comp USA.
MY 2.5 Cents
NO more posts on this one for me.
Don’t feed into this guys
Last edited by burtonbl103; Sep 9, 2004 at 10:55 AM.

These laws protect us from you.
If you want to increase the safety risk to only yourself when driving
I would not object to that. IMO, most people wouldn't.
On a public road your behavior is not private. The right to privacy that you have in your home does not apply in public. On public roads the safety of the public has precedence over the freedom of the individual.
~john
This Skull guy clearly gets off on TRYING to sound like a prize scholar here!
We all know that we are not supposed to mod tamper with this ( This is a given) We are just curious on how to do it.
I also agee that people should not drive while watching movies there is enough distractions on the road!
Once again we are all looking for info here
NOT a pissing contest!!
NO one cares how big you think your cranium is!
For all we know you work at the tech desk at the local Comp USA.
MY 2.5 Cents
NO more posts on this one for me.
Don’t feed into this guys
A) Never once have I made a personal attack here. Not even close.
B) I have been slammed now three times by people who have had NOTHING to add other than to slam me.
C) I have stated nothing but facts as I know them. And done my level best to do it with no emotional factors.
So I am curious, how am I the bad guy in all this when it is you that are doing the personal attacks and not adding anything to this conversation? Because last time I checked that is called being a hypocrite.
I am starting to understand why the three other corvette forums regularly discuss the social clique issue here and how it effects the general posting tone. It seems right now I am not part of that clique and hence I get singled out for personal attacks (even though I haven't done any). Hell from my perspective, if you post here and you are 100% right, you get slammed.
So do me a favor and do one more post and answer the question. Because I don't think you can logical back up your stance.
As for the safety issues and such, my simple minded theory is if its ok for others to have it, then its ok for all to have it.
If some sort of flashes are offered in the future it would be cool. i think pulling out a system out of your car is nuts unless you are electrically and mechanically inclined! Cars with alot of electrical tuning in them are dangerous to play with IMO. You never know what you can set off, nor what problems you can cause. Either go aftermarket, or leave it alone. Thas my .02.








