When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I read on LS1tech that the LSX block versus just the aluminum LS2/3 block shows the LSX unit weight 180lbs more. That is a **** ton of weight over the nose. If you aren't gunning for 900whp or more, just stick with these aluminum blocks. Hell, the only reason why I would say 900whp being the limit for the aluminum block is only because they don't have a 6 bolt head configuration like the LSX units do, and you would "probably" start having issues with pushing water.
Not difficult at all. New valley plate, relocate the knock sensors, cam sensor, LS2 timing chain etc. You can either buy the 58x-24x reluctor converter, change the reluctor to 24x or buy new crank with 24x reluctor.
So a convertor is available?
That is pretty nice.
Looks like I'll use the better LS3 block when the time comes to do the engine.
Thanks for the info, I really appreciate it!
I'm building an LSX for my car, I think it only weighs about 80lbs more??
No, it's MUCH more than that.
The LQ4 and LQ9 6.0L truck blocks are only about 80 pounds more than the factory aluminum blocks but the iron LSX block weighs notably more than those factory iron blocks as well.
I read on LS1tech that the LSX block versus just the aluminum LS2/3 block shows the LSX unit weight 180lbs more.
I think that is closer to the truth, but I believe you can have ~80lbs machined off the block, so that puts you down to around 100lbs more. Moving the battery to the rear of the car offsets some of that weight, as would a rear mount system, although I think Nick is planning a top mount. I am sure there are additional ways to balance the weight, however I suspect that only the most experienced would notice the difference.
I have a few LSx builds coming through the shop in the next week to 2, Ill weigh a block. It is heavy, yes, but nick, if you are not planning on more than 1200, whats the point of going Twin 76s?
Every TT car we build gets an Iron LSx and 6 bolt configuration.
be nice to see the oil squirters form the LS9 installed on the LS3.
Chris.
PS. what about the roating asembly?? wonder if it will be able to hold upto the abuse like the Ford stuff can. heard some are running over 1200bhp on stock bottom ends!!!
it throws the weight balance off more noticable then one would think. if ur a striaght line only kinda guy then no biggie
LOL
The LSX block weighs ~225 #s with a LS2 weighing nearly half that for around ~110 #s diff. Basically a bit over a full tank of fuel. Dunno how that'd affect the handling if you could notice it all.
Is anyone making extreme power (800 rwhp+) pushing their cars to the limit on the curvy tracks anyways?
The LSX block weighs ~225 #s with a LS2 weighing nearly half that for around ~110 #s diff.
This sounds about right to me. We have a couple of each floating around here might put one on a scale and see for sure. I'm sure that someone has already done this...
Not $hit talking, but have there been any failure's of the LS7 blocks? I haven't seen any but I have seen some big power put down through them. I do know that most people aren't as quick to talk about the bad of their builds though. Just wondering.
Dan
You make a VERY good point. The block itself is pretty stinkin strong!
I think the big power folk's concerns are that the heads lift when you make (roughly) more than 1200-1300 RWHP with the LS7's 4 bolt head configuration.
The LSX and warhawk's have the 6 bolt configuration which allows for A LOT more power.
I have a few LSx builds coming through the shop in the next week to 2, Ill weigh a block. It is heavy, yes, but nick, if you are not planning on more than 1200, whats the point of going Twin 76s?
Every TT car we build gets an Iron LSx and 6 bolt configuration.
hey louis i never said i was going w/76...edward said that
i got some 70 in the garage with .81ar
You make a VERY good point. The block itself is pretty stinkin strong!
I think the big power folk's concerns are that the heads lift when you make (roughly) more than 1200-1300 RWHP with the LS7's 4 bolt head configuration.
The LSX and warhawk's have the 6 bolt configuration which allows for A LOT more power.
5 vrs 6 btw
alot of the big engine builders DONT run the 6th bolt ( warhawk) as its in a suspect location.......
if u believe GM that the 09 ls3 is going to be ~20% stronger then early ls series motors then there should be no reason to run anything other. NOW IF U ARE TALKING ABOUT CAR THAT GET HUNDREDS OF RUNS @ THE TRACK A YR THEN THATS MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT STORY
I think the big power folk's concerns are that the heads lift when you make (roughly) more than 1200-1300 RWHP with the LS7's 4 bolt head configuration.
The LSX and warhawk's have the 6 bolt configuration which allows for A LOT more power.