IGN1A Coils
Jan 7, 2017 | 12:28 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
I am running e30 right now instead of e55 like normal because I had to get gas the other day on the way to work.
Also it is a chilly 55F outside, so maybe it is weather.
But so far, so good.
Jan 7, 2017 | 12:35 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Unreal
Dwell time is a big table, not a specific setting. Like I said, did 10% over stock for now.
That I know, but what I do not know is what was the base table you bumped by 10%...
This is a Dwell table I tuned for the D-585:
Christian
Jan 7, 2017 | 12:38 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
Top table is what I bumped by 10%. Not the modifier table.
And so far, my numbers are no where near that high. They still drop off a ton at upper RPM like stock.
Last edited by Unreal; Jan 7, 2017 at 12:39 PM .
Jan 7, 2017 | 12:50 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 144
From: Northern Ireland
Apparently they keep creating more spark power even up to around 8-9ms dwell.
However....Lance seemed to imply with the dwell, we should be aiming for a spark duration target or something, which can depend on lots of other factors.
Not really sure how the average person is supposed to figure that one out, but he did seem to suggest even the 4.5ms I was running might have been too much.
Way over my head that...I'll leave it at that until there is a problem, I run a little more on a friends 4cyl car, but we were trying up to around 45psi boost on it and it seemed to do so without any spark problems. I think that was only around 5.5ms, but would need to check what I left it at.
Jan 7, 2017 | 01:10 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
So should I run them flat dwell vs RPM or drop dwell as RPM increase.
Jan 7, 2017 | 01:20 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 144
From: Northern Ireland
I run them at 4.5ms throughout.
Really if anything they would require more dwell under high load vs low load. That may not be rpm dependant.
But time per firing will decrease with rpm, but even at 4.5ms that leaves tons of time in between each firing even at 7, 8000rpm
No idea how the OEM ecu deals with dwell though, there would be no need or desire to overdwell the coils especially at low loads.
Some of Lances comments towards the end of this thread
http://ls1tech.com/forums/generation...ory-coils.html
Jan 7, 2017 | 01:52 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
Factory table drops as rpm increases. I'll probably just flat line it then.
Jan 7, 2017 | 01:55 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 144
From: Northern Ireland
I guess it depends what it is dropping from and to.
And whether the tables reflect actual dwell times at the coil, or some other set of calculations going on based on the table.
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
Jan 7, 2017 | 02:01 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stevieturbo
I guess it depends what it is dropping from and to.
And whether the tables reflect actual dwell times at the coil, or some other set of calculations going on based on the table .
HPTuners gives you access to some Dwell modifier table, that can be useful...
Christian
Jan 7, 2017 | 04:00 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
Just loaded a tune with dwell set to 4.4ms. Will see what that does. Pretty big increase over stock at most RPM value.
Jan 7, 2017 | 04:43 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 144
From: Northern Ireland
If that sounds like an increase...I'd query whether the numbers on the screen do actually mean that physical dwell time at the coil.
From what I gather, it's perfectly normal for most of the LS coils to be around 4-5ms ( just not the 585's )
Jan 7, 2017 | 06:06 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
They are 4-5ms at low RPM and drop down to 2ms as RPM increase. the basically no change down low, with a big change up top.
Jan 7, 2017 | 06:21 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 144
From: Northern Ireland
That seems very low up top, although I guess n/a they didnt have much need for a lot of spark or something
Jan 7, 2017 | 06:41 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
So seems stronger. >4k the dwell is doubled so it should be getting more spark. Still have tr8ix at .028. Will maybe try gapping them up later.
For now, car runs damn good. Starts perfectly hot and cold, drives great.
Jan 8, 2017 | 03:43 PM
Melting Slicks
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 111
interesting the improvement is that noticeable. cool stuff.
Jan 8, 2017 | 05:44 PM
Thread Starter
Team Owner
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 24,035
Likes: 2,342
From: Gilbert AZ
Power wise I don't think it did anything, but for idle/part throttle it seems to.