When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Here is my best guess as to the current relative merits of the A6 vs M6 debate. I think the A6 now has pretty much leveled the playing field for drag racing. I think we will see more and more A6's move up Tommy's list. The torque converter is the great equalizer here, along with the extra gears to keep it in it's power curve.
From a roll, I would still put my money on a M6 car. Don't forget that the automatic still has bigger losses when measuring rwhp.
Only fools will now get into a pissing match as to which is quicker.
What if you bought your car to have fun with and don't care about a tick or two out on the straight pipe? What about the more than 99% of the time these cars are taking us to work, the store, or are just getting a good back road flog? When comparing one to the other it seems to me that you have to do more than look at what can shift faster.
I'm one of those people that have driven a stick all my life. I enjoy the extra involvement. I'm not Mario and I don't feel any need to be Mario. A fellow I know asked me why I put a cat back on when I normally only do mods that add power. An easy one. I did it because I hated what I felt was a crappy exhaust note. It was detracting from my enjoyment of the car. The trans is the same kind of thing. I find the stick a lot more fun than the auto. That I did or did not gain performance by choosing a stick doesnt matter. I did gain what mattered to me. More fun.
IMO this car is about enjoyment and the only real question is which box gives the buyer the most. Flame suit on and prepared to be called a sissie for suggesting that all out performance is not the only metric that matters.
Very well stated. There are lots of ways to have fun with a Corvette.
Here is my best guess as to the current relative merits of the A6 vs M6 debate. I think the A6 now has pretty much leveled the playing field for drag racing. I think we will see more and more A6's move up Tommy's list. The torque converter is the great equalizer here, along with the extra gears to keep it in it's power curve.
From a roll, I would still put my money on a M6 car. Don't forget that the automatic still has bigger losses when measuring rwhp.
Only fools will now get into a pissing match as to which is quicker.
You can't heal-toe an automatic. Unless Chevy has some type of rev-matching device coming soon like European cars, do the auto's have that?
You dont need to that is the best part the A6 is faster around the track.
Spring Mt did a test they had guys run both cars back to back all of them were faster in the A6, but the funny part they all said they felt faster in the M6
It's nice to know there is a great automatic in the Corvette. Someday, when I can no longer depress my clutch, I may get one. For now driving fun equals 6-speed stick.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Why do you think the M6 is so much faster than the A6? Will tuning for the transmission make it any quicker? I was surprised that even with favorable gearing, the A6 isnt much quicker than it is.
If the A6 was available when I bought my car, I may have gotten it instead of the manual.
Any input?
I think the potential is there for the A6 to be quick but the transmission tuning is in its infancy. If GM sticks with it I think it will develop into a good alternative.
Thanks Glenn but I still believe that in the right (aka: very skilled) hands a stock manual C6 can beat a stock A6 on the same track on the same day. Most who race their cars usually don't choose to stay stock for the length of time (roughly a year or so with multiple track visits throughout) that it takes to wring the most out of a car. I chose that route, learned a lot from each pass and just happened to snag a few visits where it all came together.
I have an A6 and I recently had my car tuned (by Rick at Synergy) along with the transmission. Among other things, he reduced TM and changed the shift points in each gear. It now shifts at around 1900-2200 rpm in each gear. Now it doesn't shift into 6th until around 65 MPH, compaired to 45 MPH pre tune. It now seams like it is much more ready for power by bringing the shift points up a bit. Having the transmisson adjusted along with the tune really brings the A6 to life.
I have an A6 and I recently had my car tuned (by Rick at Synergy) along with the transmission. Among other things,he reduced TM and changed the shift points in each gear. It now shifts at around 1900-2200 rpm in each gear. Now it doesn't shift into 6th until around 65 MPH, compaired to 45 MPH pre tune. It now seams like it is much more ready for power by bringing the shift points up a bit. Having the transmisson adjusted along with the tune really brings the A6 to life.
Thats not going to shorten the life of your transmission is it?
I'd hate to see you get only 25 or 30,000 miles out of your transmission after making such changes.
It shouldn't effect the life of the tranny in any way. Have you ever driven an A6? If not, do you know how ridiculously low the stock shift points are? It shifts into 6th gear at 45 mph and a little over 1000 rpm. When I am running in paddle mode I shift at 2000 rpm so I don't know why it would hurt the tranny to do the same thing only automatically. Do you shift your manual at 1000 rpm? I think GM has the stock shift points so low to get the MPG up to beat the gas guzzler tax. Heck, even my Toyota truck shifts at 2500 rpm.
From: NJ..."the way I saw it, everyone takes a beating sometimes."
Originally Posted by crabman
What if you bought your car to have fun with and don't care about a tick or two out on the straight pipe? What about the more than 99% of the time these cars are taking us to work, the store, or are just getting a good back road flog? When comparing one to the other it seems to me that you have to do more than look at what can shift faster.
I'm one of those people that have driven a stick all my life. I enjoy the extra involvement. I'm not Mario and I don't feel any need to be Mario. A fellow I know asked me why I put a cat back on when I normally only do mods that add power. An easy one. I did it because I hated what I felt was a crappy exhaust note. It was detracting from my enjoyment of the car. The trans is the same kind of thing. I find the stick a lot more fun than the auto. That I did or did not gain performance by choosing a stick doesnt matter. I did gain what mattered to me. More fun.
IMO this car is about enjoyment and the only real question is which box gives the buyer the most. Flame suit on and prepared to be called a sissie for suggesting that all out performance is not the only metric that matters.
I think what it really comes down to for us daily drivers is, which is the most fun to drive? Speaking as someone who has had both, I have more fun with the MZ6.
I currently have a 2005 Vert A4/3.15 that ran a 12.57@110.57 (1.92 60')
I just traded my 2006 C6 Coupe MM6 that ran a 12.55@115.85 (2.02 60')
I decided if you can't beat em join em and bought a BASE 2007 C6 A6 coupe
I recently watched LS1LT1 run three consecutive 12.2s@115+ with his BASE A6 and I ran my 12.57 in my A4/3.15 the day he ran 12.48 in his A6.
I truly believe in MOST drivers hands the A6 will be the fastest way down or around a track.
From: NJ..."the way I saw it, everyone takes a beating sometimes."
Some of you guys are missing something here. The C6 was designed as an all purpose street vehicle. It has the manners, refinement, and comforts to be used as a daily driver. It also has the power and stability to be used to compete in various track and racing events. The C6 is a dual purpose vehicle. It can drive to the track, whoop-***, then drive home and even get you to work tomorrow. If it was all about making it the fastest, GM would have made one transmission, one suspension, and limited options. They would have tested and decided what was the "best" and only allowed that particular set up to be produced. The C6 is meant for a variety of driving styles with very little difference in model performance. The C6 was built to compete out there with them. Not against itself.
So you can argue and discuss the differences and each person's opinion. After all that is what this forum is all about. Just try and keep clear what it's really all about.
If it was all about making it the fastest, GM would have made one transmission, one suspension, and limited options. They would have tested and decided what was the "best" and only allowed that particular set up to be produced.
Well they sort of did do that as well, it's called Z06.
Though even there they still offered an option package.
Originally Posted by k0bun
Some of you guys are missing something here. The C6 was designed as an all purpose street vehicle. It has the manners, refinement, and comforts to be used as a daily driver. It also has the power and stability to be used to compete in various track and racing events. The C6 is a dual purpose vehicle. It can drive to the track, whoop-***, then drive home and even get you to work tomorrow. If it was all about making it the fastest, GM would have made one transmission, one suspension, and limited options. They would have tested and decided what was the "best" and only allowed that particular set up to be produced. The C6 is meant for a variety of driving styles with very little difference in model performance. The C6 was built to compete out there with them. Not against itself.
So you can argue and discuss the differences and each person's opinion. After all that is what this forum is all about. Just try and keep clear what it's really all about.
From what I can tell, both M6s and A6s are about even in 1/4 mile times. I hardly call .2 seconds one way or the other to make one "faster" than the other.