When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why do you think the M6 is so much faster than the A6? Will tuning for the transmission make it any quicker? I was surprised that even with favorable gearing, the A6 isnt much quicker than it is.
If the A6 was available when I bought my car, I may have gotten it instead of the manual.
I'm not sure that the M6 is really that much faster, if at all. I'd like to see a comparison of track times for cars that have had tuning (TM turned off), as TM seems to affect A6 cars more. I also think that once some aftermarket torque converters for the A6 hit the market, you will see some really good times.
The A6 is NOW faster than the M6. That sucks for all the poor guys that made the mistake and bought the older technology transmission!
You are into drag racing as I recall. For comparison purposes, when comparing one time from one part of the country to another, does anyone ever compare the DAs under which the times on that list were run?
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Dec 10, 2006 at 11:39 AM.
Equal cars with GOOD drivers the Manual will be faster. The Auto is easier to drive for good times and repeatable performance times BUT uses around 10-15 RWHP to drive the torque convertor and the hydraulic clutches and pumps in the tranny.
You are into drag racing as I recall. For comparison purposes, when comparing one time from one part of the country to another, does anyone ever compare the DAs under which the times on that list were run?
I'm more into Solo 2, but I do enjoy drag racing. I tried posting corrected times one time and got chastised for it.
I have a list of my corrected times and the car was very consistent until the last time I went out. I had great air for Arizona (1150 foot DA), but my trap speed corrected out 1.5 mph slow.
You are into drag racing as I recall. For comparison purposes, when comparing one time from one part of the country to another, does anyone ever compare the DAs under which the times on that list were run?
Regardless of the DA at each track the A6 currently holds the record.
However as you can see by the corrected times below the M6 should be faster.
A6
Based on:
Temp: 33°
Humidity: 34%
Track Altitude: 33 feet
Pressure: 30.44 in.
Density Altitude = -2295 feet ET MPH
Uncorrected 12.215 @ 115.45 Corrected 12.46 @ 113.17
M6
Based on:
Temp: 59°
Humidity: 27%
Track Altitude: 10 feet
Pressure: 30.29 in.
Density Altitude = -349 feet ET MPH
Uncorrected 12.235 @ 115.58 Corrected 12.28 @ 115.19
Edited for better weather station for Atco.
Last edited by Brett Hunter; Dec 10, 2006 at 12:28 PM.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Why do you think the M6 is so much faster than the A6? Will tuning for the transmission make it any quicker? I was surprised that even with favorable gearing, the A6 isnt much quicker than it is.
If the A6 was available when I bought my car, I may have gotten it instead of the manual.
Regardless of the DA at each track the A6 currently holds the record.
However as you can see by the corrected times below the M6 should be faster.
A6
Based on:
Temp: 33°
Humidity: 34%
Track Altitude: 33 feet
Pressure: 30.44 in.
Density Altitude = -2295 feet ET MPH
Uncorrected 12.215 @ 115.45 Corrected 12.46 @ 113.17
M6
Based on:
Temp: 59°
Humidity: 27%
Track Altitude: 10 feet
Pressure: 30.29 in.
Density Altitude = -349 feet ET MPH
Uncorrected 12.235 @ 115.58 Corrected 12.28 @ 115.19
Edited for better weather station for Atco.
The A6 currently holds the quickest reported quarter mile time.
Coincidentally I did the exact same calculations right after I asked that question using the exact same numbers in one calculation and using data from accuweather in another and the DA s come in at a very close to, and right on to what you have.
Interestingly the A6 time that you come up with in your calculation, 12.46 @ 113.17 is about the same as that driver's initial reported best of 12.48@112.11 on the same track back in March of '06.
Of the top two on that list in the gentleman from TN post, the 12.21 was run in no more than 39.9* weather according to the times on the slip and weather information from two nearby stations. the 12.23 was run in at least 55* weather according to the drivers statement and the times on his slip and temps in the area at the time of the run.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Dec 10, 2006 at 01:26 PM.
I bought the manual, purely because I love driving a stick. I knew I would be giving up the edge on the track, but then again, Im on the street A LOT more than the track. So, besides track times, the control you feel with a clutch and a shifter is just to cool.
However as you can see by the corrected times below the M6 should be faster. A6
Based on:
Temp: 33°
Humidity: 34%
Track Altitude: 33 feet
Pressure: 30.44 in.
Density Altitude = -2295 feet ET MPH
Uncorrected 12.215 @ 115.45 Corrected 12.46 @ 113.17
M6
Based on:
Temp: 59°
Humidity: 27%
Track Altitude: 10 feet
Pressure: 30.29 in.
Density Altitude = -349 feet ET MPH
Uncorrected 12.235 @ 115.58 Corrected 12.28 @ 115.19
This is basically true, except that 1) the calculations we had on a TAG handheld weather station right at the track (considered by most to be THE most accurate determination of DA at a given time/location) showed a DA of roughly -700 give or take throughout the day with a reading of almost -900 around the time of my 12.2 runs and 2) according to this post...
Originally Posted by 06C6FVR
I have also said that weather and altitude play a HUGE role in affecting 1/4 mile times and power. I dont remember the exact DA on the 12.2 run, but I know it was in the negative range...i think somewhere around -1300. The track prep also plays a large role in your times, as if i wasnt spinning mostly through 2nd, i probably would have gotten some better times too. Thanks dennis, i did this for my own information just to see how much affect the altitude plays on the times. I will post results as i get them, good or bad. We can all learn something from the rest of us. that is what is great about the forum
Daren
...Daren's 12.2 was run in -1300.
Also, how about wheelspin, sixty foot, wind conditions etc, do these corrections factor ALL of that in as well?
LS1LT1, you better watch out around every corner. There are going to a bunch of teenage girls driving the old technology manually shifted transmissions (i.e. the junk MN6 or MZ6) trying to beat your time. It must hurt these jealous people terribly when they realized that they could have bought the fastest tranny if they had just been willing to spend another $1000.
A friend of mine that has the A6 ran a 13.4 so I was going by that time. I guess there is a lot of driver involvement in the running of an A6. Relax, I wasnt attacking anyone's honey there. If I want an A6 I will buy one.