C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

0W30 mobil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
dansdrm's Avatar
dansdrm
Thread Starter
Racer
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: WALBRIDGE OH
Default 0W30 mobil

Can i use 0W30 mobil in my O7
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #2  
Whiterock1's Avatar
Whiterock1
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 1
Default

I definitely would NOT use it. It gets hot in Ohio in the summer and 5-30 makes more sense in the summer. I prefer 10-30 year round, others think 5-30 is what you MUST use, but I don't know anyone who would recommend 0-30--unless you were in Norway or somewhere like that. Just my 2 centavos...
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #3  
dansdrm's Avatar
dansdrm
Thread Starter
Racer
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: WALBRIDGE OH
Default thank you

Picked some up at a great deal,will put it in me lawn mower.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #4  
Whiterock1's Avatar
Whiterock1
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by dansdrm
Picked some up at a great deal,will put it in me lawn mower.
I use synthetic in mine, too. Makes sense, when you consider how hard you run them. I always buy a cheap mower, so when I hit a rock, I won't freak out.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #5  
glass slipper's Avatar
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,328
Likes: 405
Default

Originally Posted by dansdrm
Can i use 0W30 mobil in my O7
Yes, you can use 0W30 in your '07 'Vette. Check out the following links:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...bil1_0W-30.asp
http://www.mobil1.com/USA-English/Lu...bil1_5W-30.asp
http://www.mobil1.com/USA-English/Mo...l_1_0W-30.aspx
http://www.mobil1.com/USA-English/Mo...l_1_5W-30.aspx

The 0W and 5W have nothing to do with how the oil performs at higher ambient temps when the engine is warmed up. The "W" designates the "winter" rating which actually means the viscosity of the oil is checked at 0*F vs 100*C for the "30" rating. It's a measure of how well the oil flows when you start the engine cold...the lower the number, the better the oil flows when cold to get to critical engine parts to reduce cold start up wear.

If you look at the product data sheets for 0W30 and 5W30 (the first two links), you'll see at 40*C (104*F) there isn't much difference in the viscosities (63.1 cSt and 64.8 cSt respectively). At 100*C (212*F), it's 11 cSt and 11.3 cSt respectively. So, when starting the engine at high ambient temps in the summer and continuing up to the max oil temp when the engine is warmed up, there's neglible differences between the two oils. Also, if you look at the last two links, you'll see both oils meet the GM4718M specification which is for the Corvette.

The difference comes in at lower ambient temps when starting the car...the 0W30 will offer better protection. It's typical for oil to be changed once a year now with the 10K+ mile oil change intervals which means the oil will see all four seasons. Go to the section on oil in the owners manual and it will say if you'll see ambient temps below -20*F, to use 0W30 oil. I know you don't get down that low (even your record lows aren't quite that low), but you'll still get better low temperature protection. You definitely don't want to use 10W30 since the owners manual says to use it only above 0*F and it can get that low where you are. Here in Florida, I could use any of the three, but I use 5W30 year round. Ford, Honda, Toyota and Chrysler specify 5W20 and 0W20 oil for their engines.
http://www.mobil1.com/USA-English/Mo...l_1_0W-20.aspx
http://www.mobil1.com/USA-English/Mo...l_1_5W-20.aspx

Last edited by glass slipper; Jul 7, 2007 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #6  
Whiterock1's Avatar
Whiterock1
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 1
Default

I don't agree, the 0-30 isn't intended for Corvettes and I've read many articles saying to definitely NOT use it in hi-po engines unless you live in an extremely cold climate where it was originally designed for, what they call "extreme conditions. The 5-30 is a good compromise, keeping in mind they want 5 weight for emissions and fuel economy performance, not better engine wear. I've used 10-30 in every car I've owned since the big block era and never had the slightest engine problem. Your money, your car, and you will get differing opinions like everything else, but I wouldn't use it. There's another thread on this, and I think you'll find most agree with me. Glass Slipper thinks otherwise, so like I said, opinions will vary.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:10 PM
  #7  
The Clevite Kid's Avatar
The Clevite Kid
Safety Car
Supporting Lifetime
St. Jude 15 Year Donor
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 78
From: Miami FL
2020 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16,'17,'18-'19-'20-'21-'22
Default

I agree with Whiterock1, and particularly here in South Florida 10W-30 is the Mobil 1 of choice.

For my non-Corvette, I even fortify that with a splash of Delvac 1 5W-40 (a.k.a. Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck oil), which provides more zinc dithiophosphate than does the straight spark-ignition engine oil.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #8  
glass slipper's Avatar
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,328
Likes: 405
Default

Originally Posted by Whiterock1
I don't agree, the 0-30 isn't intended for Corvettes and I've read many articles saying to definitely NOT use it in hi-po engines unless you live in an extremely cold climate where it was originally designed for, what they call "extreme conditions. The 5-30 is a good compromise, keeping in mind they want 5 weight for emissions and fuel economy performance, not better engine wear. I've used 10-30 in every car I've owned since the big block era and never had the slightest engine problem. Your money, your car, and you will get differing opinions like everything else, but I wouldn't use it. There's another thread on this, and I think you'll find most agree with me. Glass Slipper thinks otherwise, so like I said, opinions will vary.
I didn't give my opinion. I posted links, quoted numbers, and quoted the owners manual...all facts. As opposed to your opinion with no links or facts to back it up. You only allude to articles and threads with no links provided.

Did you even read any of the links? Did you see where the 0W30 passed the GM4718M specification for Corvettes? Why would they pass that spec if it wasn't intended to be used in Corvettes? Also, the 5W30 isn't used for emissions, it's used for fuel economy and better wear protection during cold start up...read the links. In fact, look at the product data sheet for 10W30.
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...l_1_10W-30.asp
You'll see that the viscosity at 40*C and 100*C is less than 0W30 or 5W30 with 0W30 falling in between the two. Seriously, I think you're being a little **** about this. The recommended oil is 5W30, if you don't see a problem with going up by 5 on the "W" rating, what's the big deal if you go down by 5? We're talking about such insignificant differences in viscosity for summer starting temperatures and fully warmed engine temperatures, it makes this whole discussion a moot point. The difference comes in when winter temps drop way down. I see it gets below 0*F (where you shouldn't be using 10W30 IAW the owners manual) and can get below -20*F (where the owners manual recommends 0W30) in Colorado Springs. It's during these times where the 0W30 will outperform 5W/10W30 (look at their pour point temperatures)...and it falls in between them at normal engine operating temps.

The engines of today have nothing in common with the big blocks of yesteryear...welcome to the 21st Century. We ran 20W50 in those old engines with no problems, they were designed for it. Now the owners manual says specifically not to run even 10W40 as the engines of today have completely different internal clearances...so a case can be made that 10W30 is even more on the side of extreme than 0W30, but that would be like splitting hairs. No opinion, just facts...read the links. Here's another link to help you understand why GM says no 10W40 or 20W50:
http://www.acea.be/files/070308%20AC...20and%20HD.pdf

Last edited by glass slipper; Jul 7, 2007 at 03:34 PM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #9  
glass slipper's Avatar
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,328
Likes: 405
Default

Originally Posted by clevitekid
I agree with Whiterock1, and particularly here in South Florida 10W-30 is the Mobil 1 of choice.

For my non-Corvette, I even fortify that with a splash of Delvac 1 5W-40 (a.k.a. Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck oil), which provides more zinc dithiophosphate than does the straight spark-ignition engine oil.
The engine operating temperature will be the same whether you're in south Florida or Ohio and both oils have the same "30" rating meaning they are in the same viscosity range at the engine's operating temperature. The difference is the "W" rating which is done at 0*F. The real funny thing here is the viscosity of all three of the oils (0W, 5W, and 10W) is actually much "thicker" at 0*F (or even 40*C)...so if the 0W30 is too "thin" in hot climates, then the 10W30 is definitely too "thin" when the engine warms up. This isn't opinion, look at the product data sheets in the links and stop going off of what "sounds" right.

I'm not recommending anybody/everybody go out and change to 0W30 although I really don't see much difference between any of them. However, the only advantage I do see is of the 0W30 at the colder start up temps in the north/high elevations where its' better pour point temperature will enable it to outperform the others by flowing to critical engine parts quicker. Other than that, they're all the same. I just don't understand why the gross disdain for the 0W30 when it's only 5 away from the 5W30...that's really kind of **** to me. The original poster got a great deal and asked if he could use 0W30...the answer is yes. Like I said, I'm not telling everybody to go out en mass today and change to 0W30. Run what you want, I use 5W30 and I'm in sunny Florida.

Last edited by glass slipper; Jul 7, 2007 at 07:17 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #10  
Whiterock1's Avatar
Whiterock1
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by glass slipper
I didn't give my opinion. I posted links, quoted numbers, and quoted the owners manual...all facts. As opposed to your opinion with no links or facts to back it up. You only allude to articles and threads with no links provided. That was how you learned history, wasn't it?
Did you even read any of the links? Did you see where the 0W30 passed the GM4718M specification for Corvettes? Why would they pass that spec if it wasn't intended or allowed to be used in Corvettes? Also, the 5W30 isn't used for emissions, it's used for fuel economy and better wear protection during cold start up...read the links. In fact, look at the product data sheet for 10W30.
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...l_1_10W-30.asp
You'll see that the viscosity at 40*C and 100*C is less than 0W30 or 5W30 with 0W30 falling in between the two. Seriously, I think you're being a little **** about this. I would say that hidebound belief that anything other than 5w-30 is being ****. The recommended oil is 5W30, if you don't see a problem with going up by 5 on the "W" rating, what's the big deal if you go down by 5? We're talking about such insignificant differences in viscosity for summer starting temperatures and fully warmed engine temperatures, it makes this whole discussion a moot point. The difference comes in when winter temps drop way down. I see it gets below 0*F (where you shouldn't be using 10W30 IAW the owners manual) and can get below -20*F (where the owners manual recommends 0W30) in Colorado Springs. It's during these times where the 0W30 will outperform 5W/10W30 (look at their pour point temperatures)...and it falls in between them at normal engine operating temps. No argument here, in winter you are 100% correct. Lower number means easier flow.

The engines of today have nothing in common with the big blocks of yesteryear...welcome to the 21st Century. We ran 20W50 in those old engines with no problems, they were designed for it. Actually, they recommended staight 30 weight for YEARS in big block GM engines. Now the owners manual says specifically not to run even 10W40 as the engines of today have completely different internal clearances...so a case can be made that 10W30 is even more on the side of extreme than 0W30, but that would be like splitting hairs. No opinion, just facts...read the links. Here's another link to help you understand why GM says no 10W40 or 20W50:
http://www.acea.be/files/070308%20AC...20and%20HD.pdf
Actually, I did read the links, hence the reference to "extreme--read, very cold, conditions." I can't quote chapter and verse on what I've read, just that I've read it. Also, as I said, I've used 10-30 on ALL of my cars, to include not just 400 or 455 Pontiac big blocks, but engines from the '80s, '90s and 2000s, 350, 305, L-98, LT-1, LS-1, Grand National 3.8 turbo, Saab 9000 tubo and LS2. I also agree that 10-40 is not recommended and for good reason dealing with engine clearances.

However, I clearly stated this is my opinion based on experience and reading an average of 6 car mags a month for 30 years plus owning cars in the eras I mention. I also owned an automotive repair shop for 4 years in NH and saw many internal engine parts toasted and always asking what kind of oil they used. Never once did we have a car where the driver ran 10w-30 and had an internal engine failure. We saw many with 5-30, however. Not statistically significant, of course, but an entry into how my opinion has been formed. 30 weight is 30 weight for summer driving, but 0 is too light to mix in when the temps get above 85-90. 5 is for mileage reasons--and emissions, per GM, and works fine in hot weather. I feel in very hot-->90 extended and especially in traffic, climates 10 gives better protection at no real penalty when the weather gets cold. It ranges from 100 to -20 here in CO. To me, 10W-30 is the best overall--as it was in the Midwest and New England. When we lived in southern VA and especially Houston, I would never dream of using anything else. My opinion, but I believe that was what the poster was asking.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #11  
timd38's Avatar
timd38
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,592
Likes: 187
From: Hudson WI
NCM Sinkhole Donor
Default

All I can add is that I talked with the Mobil guys on the Hot Rod Power Tour and they said that 0w30 should be the first choice if you can find it and the 5w30 would perform just as well, because that is what GM recommended.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 04:26 PM
  #12  
glass slipper's Avatar
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,328
Likes: 405
Default

Originally Posted by Whiterock1
Actually, I did read the links, hence the reference to "extreme--read, very cold, conditions." I can't quote chapter and verse on what I've read, just that I've read it. Otherwise referred to as hearsay...no links, no facts. Also, as I said, I've used 10-30 on ALL of my cars, to include not just 400 or 455 Pontiac big blocks, but engines from the '80s, '90s and 2000s, 350, 305, L-98, LT-1, LS-1, Grand National 3.8 turbo, Saab 9000 tubo and LS2. I also agree that 10-40 is not recommended and for good reason dealing with engine clearances.

However, I clearly stated this is my opinion based on experience and reading an average of 6 car mags a month for 30 years plus owning cars in the eras I mention. I also owned an automotive repair shop for 4 years in NH and saw many internal engine parts toasted and always asking what kind of oil they used. Never once did we have a car where the driver ran 10w-30 and had an internal engine failure. We saw many with 5-30, however. Not statistically significant, of course, but an entry into how my opinion has been formed. 30 weight is 30 weight for summer driving, but 0 is too light to mix in when the temps get above 85-90. 5 is for mileage reasons--and emissions, per GM (got a link) , and works fine in hot weather. I feel in very hot-->90 extended and especially in traffic, climates 10 gives better protection at no real penalty when the weather gets cold. It ranges from 100 to -20 here in CO. To me, 10W-30 is the best overall--as it was in the Midwest and New England. When we lived in southern VA and especially Houston, I would never dream of using anything else. My opinion, but I believe that was what the poster was asking.
If you read the links, you must not be comprehending them...you're just not getting it. At 40*C (104*F), the viscosity of all three of the oils is so close you could call them the same...look at the links again. The "W" rating is done at 0*F, so whether it's a 0W, 5W, or 10W has no relevance to a dicussion about performance of the oils at 85*+F and what you "feel" has no relevance either. The viscosity rating at 40*C has much more relevance to a discussion involving temps between 85*F and 100*F. Go read your owners manual to see where it says no 10W30 below 0*F...and you say you get to -20*F where you're at. GM seems to think there is a penalty to using 10W30 when the weather gets cold contary to your opinion. Since they have a lot of smart engineers and millions of dollars of research in this, I'll go with their "opinion". The original poster asked for facts, not opinions.

Last edited by glass slipper; Jul 7, 2007 at 07:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #13  
glass slipper's Avatar
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,328
Likes: 405
Default

Originally Posted by timd38
All I can add is that I talked with the Mobil guys on the Hot Rod Power Tour and they said that 0w30 should be the first choice if you can find it and the 5w30 would perform just as well, because that is what GM recommended.
Thank you, and the facts in their product data sheets confirm what they told you.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #14  
xs650's Avatar
xs650
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,375
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Default

GlassSlipper

As usual, you make good points.

There are still a lot of people afraid of low xW numbers because of the poor performance of many earlier dino based oils that broke down in use.

One comment... the test for the xW part of the rating hasn't been done at 0F for about 30 years. Each xW viscosity has two tests done, one for pumpability and one for cranking resistance at temperatures below 0F. The lower the xW viscosity, the colder the test temperatures. SAE J300 covers that.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #15  
glass slipper's Avatar
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,328
Likes: 405
Default

Originally Posted by xs650
GlassSlipper

As usual, you make good points.

There are still a lot of people afraid of low xW numbers because of the poor performance of many earlier dino based oils that broke down in use.

One comment... the test for the xW part of the rating hasn't been done at 0F for about 30 years. Each xW viscosity has two tests done, one for pumpability and one for cranking resistance at temperatures below 0F. The lower the xW viscosity, the colder the test temperatures. SAE J300 covers that.
I knew about the pumpability/cranking resistance tests...
http://www.infineum.com/information/...sity-2004.html
but I thought they were still doing the 0*F test too. You are correct though, they abandoned the 0*F test it seems in the '80s/'90s.
http://www.savantgroup.com/newslett/...n96/jan96b.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/oldhokie/windyridge/oil.pdf
...sometimes it's hard to teach an old dog new tricks.

I really never gave any thought/consideration to this until the poster started this thread, but the chart in the first link really shows how superior the 0W30 oil is to all the others...I might have to rethink using 5W30. I went through the same thing in the early '80s as I used 20W50 exclusively in the '70s and found it very difficult to imagine 5W30 could do the job. After 25 years and 200K+ miles on several cars with zero failures, I'm a believer.

Thanks for posting the correct info.

Last edited by glass slipper; Jul 7, 2007 at 06:11 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #16  
Whiterock1's Avatar
Whiterock1
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by glass slipper
If you read the links, you must not be comprehending them...you're just not getting it. At 40*C (104*F), the viscosity of all three of the oils is so close you could call them the same...look at the links again. The "W" rating is done at 0*F, so whether it's a 0W, 5W, or 10W has no relevance to a dicussion about performance of the oils at 85*+F and what you "feel" has no relevance either. The viscosity rating at 40*C has much more relevance to a discussion involving temps between 85*F and 100*F. Go read your owners manual to see where it says no 10W30 below 0*F...and you say you get to -20*F where you're at. GM seems to think there is a penalty to using 10W30 when the weather gets cold contary to your opinion. Since they have a lot of smart engineers and millions of dollars of research in this, I'll go with their "opinion". The original poster asked for facts, not opinions.
Your links say virtually the same thing about 0, 5 and 10-30--the only exception being, as I said and you can't seem to understand, 0 is recommended for severe conditions, i.e., extreme cold. It has been since it was first marketed by the oil companies. Yes, it will work ok--but no better than 5 or 10-30 in the vast majority of the US, and many feel not as well in high temps, ambient and due to traffic conditions. Check and see what Ferrari requires for their cars, seeing as how you love links, and the thought process of the guys who own them. http://www.ferrari-talk.com/discus/messages/5/5001.html. That isn't hearsay, but then nothing that I said was "hearsay," rather relying on information and belief. But as I'm a lawyer and you're not, I won't go there.

Out of the bottle viscosity is not the only criterion that matters for oil. Any lighter weight will flow well in hot weather. That's not the point. Shearing or breakdown at the molecular level is more critical in the real world. Look up Penzoil Platinum data for a good rundown on other factors. Or here's another link: http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/oilshear.htm The US military in hot climates specs 10-30 or 10-40, specifically saying do not use 5 weight--much less 0, but then, what do they know? And, as posted on the PurESCAPE thread, what manufacturers claim in not necessarily the factual reality. Experience, and I have driven and raced hi-po cars for almost 40 years, is a better discriminator than marketing hype, at least to me. Most of your so called 'facts' are simply that: marketing hype. The thread wasn't started as an invitation to flame; you've made it that. Derogatory comments in your posts don't strengthen your position, just make you seem like a know it all, conceited ***, whether or not you intend it. You may be an engineer, but I work with PhDs, so your technical self proclaimed "knowledge" leaves me underwhelmed.

Last edited by Whiterock1; Jul 8, 2007 at 11:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #17  
ztheusa's Avatar
ztheusa
Safety Car
Veteran: National Guard
25 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,572
Likes: 420
From: Taildragers rule! USA1
Default

Originally Posted by dansdrm
Can i use 0W30 mobil in my O7
Why don't you like the oil that Chevrolet recommends?
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To 0W30 mobil

Old Jul 8, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #18  
NocarbutaVetteforme's Avatar
NocarbutaVetteforme
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 41
From: Corinth TX
Default

Originally Posted by glass slipper
I knew about the pumpability/cranking resistance tests...
http://www.infineum.com/information/...sity-2004.html
but I thought they were still doing the 0*F test too. You are correct though, they abandoned the 0*F test it seems in the '80s/'90s.
http://www.savantgroup.com/newslett/...n96/jan96b.htm
http://mysite.verizon.net/oldhokie/windyridge/oil.pdf
...sometimes it's hard to teach an old dog new tricks.

I really never gave any thought/consideration to this until the poster started this thread, but the chart in the first link really shows how superior the 0W30 oil is to all the others...I might have to rethink using 5W30. I went through the same thing in the early '80s as I used 20W50 exclusively in the '70s and found it very difficult to imagine 5W30 could do the job. After 25 years and 200K+ miles on several cars with zero failures, I'm a believer.

Thanks for posting the correct info.
Every one of your posts was spot on. In fact, 0W40 is standard fill in the SRT-10s. Times have changed and there are alot of new weights that we can use in our cars. I have even heard from one petroleum engineer that he uses diesel oil due to all of the additives. This guy is a petroleum engineer for Mobile.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #19  
xs650's Avatar
xs650
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,375
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Default

Originally Posted by Whiterock1
Yes, it will work ok--but no better than 5 or 10-30 in the vast majority of the US, and many feel not as well in high temps, ambient and due to traffic conditions. Check and see what Ferrari requires for their cars, seeing as how you love links, and the thought process of the guys who own them. http://www.ferrari-talk.com/discus/messages/5/5001.html. That isn't hearsay, but then nothing that I said was "hearsay," rather relying on information and belief. But as I'm a lawyer and you're not, I won't go there.

Out of the bottle viscosity is not the only criterion that matters for oil. Any lighter weight will flow well in hot weather. That's not the point. Shearing or breakdown at the molecular level is more critical in the real world. Look up Penzoil Platinum data for a good rundown on other factors. Or here's another link: http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/oilshear.htm The US military in hot climates specs 10-30 or 10-40, specifically saying do not use 5 weight--much less 0, but then, what do they know? And, as posted on the PurESCAPE thread, what manufacturers claim in not necessarily the factual reality. Experience, and I have driven and raced hi-po cars for almost 40 years, is a better discriminator than marketing hype, at least to me. Most of your so called 'facts' are simply that: marketing hype. The thread wasn't started as an invitation to flame; you've made it that. Derogatory comments in your posts don't strengthen your position, just make you seem like a know it all, conceited ***, whether or not you intend it. You may be an engineer, but I work with PhDs, so your technical self proclaimed "knowledge" leaves me underwhelmed.
Whiterock, from the BITOG link you gave

Whitrock, from the BIOTOG source you gave

"Synth Oils do not rely as much on special Viscosity Index Improver additives and will experience little permanent viscosity loss. "
You do realize that M1 is a synthetic??

And you inquired
The US military in hot climates specs 10-30 or 10-40, specifically saying do not use 5 weight--much less 0, but then, what do they know?
The US military uses non-synthetic oil from the lowest bidder that meets their unremarkable specs, primarily in diesel engines. That has no relationship to high quality synthetics. Last I was developing vehicles for the US military, they used 15W-40, not 10W-40.

You may be an engineer, but I work with PhDs, so your technical self proclaimed "knowledge" leaves me underwhelmed.
Aha, you resort to the "I stayed at a Holiday in Express" argument.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #20  
Hairbag's Avatar
Hairbag
Racer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

I love these oil debates. After 29 years with "big oil" I have a hard time holding back. Rule #1 if it's under warranty do what the books says and my book for an 05 says 5W30 meeting GM4718M spec. After that do what you want. 5W30 and 10W30 have the same high temp vis. GM when selecting 5W30 as there prefered grade considered the benifits of 5W30 from a MPG stand point.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE