When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
341-----270...
why is that (am no dyno expert)!!!!!!
I have no idea. I was shocked at this also but Vortech (who did the dyno) said that all the C6 were dyno at around 270rwhp. I did not think it should be such a big difference.
In the Import tuner world this is a known fact. Mustangs are notoriously lower than dynojets.
When my EVO9 dynos at 340 AWHP on a mustang Dyno, it gos 114 MPH in the 1/4 mile (at 12.1 seconds). It seems that most people that use dynojet dynos and get about the same 1/4 mile trap speeds, say their car dynoed in the low 400s. The number doesn't mater, it's the increase that you are looking for when tuning. I don't care if my car baselines 240 HP, Im looking for the increase. After the parts and tuning, if I dyno at 350 HP, now we are talking. To me this is the usefullness of a dyno.... to verify the parts/tuning package improvement in the car, and to monitor AFR. The 1/4 mile will also reveal this but it's difficult to tune on the track. The dyno offers a safe enviornment to experiment and get the best results. I also like a little road tuning to confirm the tune and make small adjustments since the dyno can not exactly duplicate road conditions. My $.02.
In the Import tuner world this is a known fact. Mustangs are notoriously lower than dynojets.
When my EVO9 dynos at 340 AWHP on a mustang Dyno, it gos 114 MPH in the 1/4 mile (at 12.1 seconds). It seems that most people that use dynojet dynos and get about the same 1/4 mile trap speeds, say their car dynoed in the low 400s. The number doesn't mater, it's the increase that you are looking for when tuning. I don't care if my car baselines 240 HP, Im looking for the increase. After the parts and tuning, if I dyno at 350 HP, now we are talking. To me this is the usefullness of a dyno.... to verify the parts/tuning package improvement in the car, and to monitor AFR. The 1/4 mile will also reveal this but it's difficult to tune on the track. The dyno offers a safe enviornment to experiment and get the best results. I also like a little road tuning to confirm the tune and make small adjustments since the dyno can not exactly duplicate road conditions. My $.02.
I own one of these stingy Mustang Dynos with dual eddy current absorbers. And I agree totally with you, as long as I can show an improvement in a customers car after I mod and tune their cars they are always smiling when they write the check
Last January my 06' A6 (mustang) dynoed @ 311 rwhp & 309 tq. After mods ended up with 355 / 358. Work performed @ Straightline performance. Very pleased.
I own one of these stingy Mustang Dynos with dual eddy current absorbers. And I agree totally with you, as long as I can show an improvement in a customers car after I mod and tune their cars they are always smiling when they write the check
dynos are tuning devices. Only wannabes get hung up on numbers.
My '07 LS2 MN6 with zero mods baselined on Tom's (tjwong) Mustang at 334 rwhp 336 rwt. I've seen dynojet baselines on other stock MN/MZ6 '07's in the 345-355 range. I'm having a hard time believing a 70hp difference but indeed there is a difference.
The numbers can be fudged any way the operator wants to. When I was last on a Mustang dyno, he mad an adjustment to the dyno to make it compare to a dynojet and under the standard readings it was 343, under the corrected for dynojet readings it was 371. This a stock 05 MN6 coupe. That would have made it the highest factory RWHP coupe on the forum I believe. Point being, it's all in the operator of the dyno.
The numbers can be fudged any way the operator wants to. When I was last on a Mustang dyno, he mad an adjustment to the dyno to make it compare to a dynojet and under the standard readings it was 343, under the corrected for dynojet readings it was 371. This a stock 05 MN6 coupe. That would have made it the highest factory RWHP coupe on the forum I believe. Point being, it's all in the operator of the dyno.
Well, I know that theres probably 3 DynoJets to one Mustang or another brand, but who is to say that DynoJet is right? Maybe they are all giving ficticious numbers The nice thing with a Mustang or for that matter any other dyno that has loading capability is that I can simulate your car going down the road for real time real road loaded conditions just as if you are drlving down the road. What that means is that I don't have to drive your car down the road to tune part throttle conditions. Or lets say you have a problem with engine mis-fire while climbing a steep grade, well all I have to do is to input the grade of the hill, your cars weight and a drag coefficient and drive the car, if you are towing a load of say 10000# I can add that in as well.
Most DynoJets do not have that capability, some have Eddy Current absorbers which is what I have (I have dual PAUs) while others have a mechanical braking device. That is a POS, because as with any friction brake it creates heat and with heat the coefficient of friction changes which changes the load that the operator can apply to the dyno rolls. I can go on and on about load controls as I designed them for paper machines and paper winder controls, the only way to do it correctly is with complex electronics such as eddy current absorbers or regenerative AC Drives.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.