When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm not going to give out names, because that's not my place. But friend of mine bought a new Z51 six speed coupe a few weeks ago. He ran a 12.9 at 112. The catch is that he has not owned a manual transmission vehicle in something like 10 years (and that was a pickup truck). He has never drag raced a manual car at all, and the weather conditions were not that good.
My point is that these cars are definitely running better than some folks think they are.
this is my FIRST car that is a manual
I have driven sticks before but just occasionally
My first trip down the track was 12.9 @113 stock
It makes me wonder who is driving these other cars? And how they are driving them
this is my FIRST car that is a manual
I have driven sticks before but just occasionally
My first trip down the track was 12.9 @113 stock
It makes me wonder who is driving these other cars? And how they are driving them
There seems to be a notion that if you go to a dragstrip, and see "someone" (who you don't even know) run a XX.X time, then that's how fast the car is! People don't realize that drag racing is like any other sport. There are a handful of really good drivers, a couple of handfuls of pretty good drivers, and a whole lot of pretty so-so drivers.
Kind of like golf - I have read that a very large % of golfers have never broken 100 (I'm one of them, btw). Must be the clubs
There seems to be a notion that if you go to a dragstrip, and see "someone" (who you don't even know) run a XX.X time, then that's how fast the car is! People don't realize that drag racing is like any other sport. There are a handful of really good drivers, a couple of handfuls of pretty good drivers, and a whole lot of pretty so-so drivers.
Kind of like golf - I have read that a very large % of golfers have never broken 100 (I'm one of them, btw). Must be the clubs
And if we could just get folks to list ALL the info:
BTW
Onyasix went 12.71 @ 111.86 with a 2006 A6 I asked for his correct 60 ft time....... still waiting. I hope to get one more trip to the track E Town before it closes Nov 20th.
I have been speaking with Zippin Z (he started the thread I'm only doing the record keeping) regarding making a it a sticky or FAQ with the following info:
Car & options
Date
Race Track & State
Temperature
Relative Humidity
Absolute Barometer
Rear tire pressure
Front tire pressure
Launch technique
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
St. Jude donor in memory of jpee '14
Originally Posted by jschindler
My point is that these cars are definitely running better than some folks think they are.
I was one of those guys who at first thought the C6 couldn't get out of its own way. Part of my problem was that I was used to driving a materially faster car. Another part of my problem, was getting used to driving the car and feeling comfortable. Finally, at the August 6th show and go at Englishtown I saw many bone stock C6's run very slow quarter mile times.
Now after driving my C6 for a while and three trips to the track I am very confident that I can get my C6 to go 12.7 or better
What are the specs on this C6? Auto or manual. What mods?
It is a Z51 manual. Mods are Stinger without CAI, Dynatech Supermaxx headers, Tune with Torque Management, Launch control and Wheel Hop control still active. Stock tires with no track prep. I would imagine if I ran it on a prepped track the times would be reduced quite a bit. Also the DA was around 2440 that day.
I have driven a manual my entire life, nothing but, starting with a 3spd 1980 F100. My car traps at 106mph, John Force is not going to get it to 111mph, and certainly not the upper teens that some people are claiming.
Not to mention I beat another C6. The kooks, blackwing, and tuned C6 trapped at 111mph several times in a row, and it was by no means his first time on the track.
On Dec 2nd, I'll be out again. I'll put high octane in a few days before and reset the PCM. It'll be in the 60's, maybe the high 50's, so temps won't be a problem. I'll be at 1200' still but I will have 0 humidity.
If I am still trapping at 106mph, I'll hand the keys over to one of the seasoned Vette racers there, but I honestly doubt they'll be able to do much better at least as far as trap speed goes.
Sorry if I missed this in an earlier post but or you running with all systems off? Scanning my car while doing the above runs I noticed that something (probably ABS) was reducing TQ at launch and during the 3-4 shift with all systems on and even with TC off. With TC on my car reported -37 lbs of TQ crossing the line. With TC off it was 37 lbs and with all systems off I believe it was around 361 lbs. Notice I picked up around 2.5 mph with all systems off.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
St. Jude donor in memory of jpee '14
Originally Posted by jdwk
I have driven a manual my entire life, nothing but, starting with a 3spd 1980 F100. My car traps at 106mph, John Force is not going to get it to 111mph, and certainly not the upper teens that some people are claiming.
Not to mention I beat another C6. The kooks, blackwing, and tuned C6 trapped at 111mph several times in a row, and it was by no means his first time on the track.
On Dec 2nd, I'll be out again. I'll put high octane in a few days before and reset the PCM. It'll be in the 60's, maybe the high 50's, so temps won't be a problem. I'll be at 1200' still but I will have 0 humidity.
If I am still trapping at 106mph, I'll hand the keys over to one of the seasoned Vette racers there, but I honestly doubt they'll be able to do much better at least as far as trap speed goes.
Don't be so quick with the keys! My trap speed was 106 in 83 degree heat and 109.4 on a 55 degree night. Good luck
I have driven a manual my entire life, nothing but, starting with a 3spd 1980 F100. My car traps at 106mph, John Force is not going to get it to 111mph, and certainly not the upper teens that some people are claiming.
Not to mention I beat another C6. The kooks, blackwing, and tuned C6 trapped at 111mph several times in a row, and it was by no means his first time on the track.
On Dec 2nd, I'll be out again. I'll put high octane in a few days before and reset the PCM. It'll be in the 60's, maybe the high 50's, so temps won't be a problem. I'll be at 1200' still but I will have 0 humidity.
If I am still trapping at 106mph, I'll hand the keys over to one of the seasoned Vette racers there, but I honestly doubt they'll be able to do much better at least as far as trap speed goes.
haha john force would probably drive a c6 stick about 13.50
but i drove mine 113mph at sac raceway it was in the 80's doubt it if you must
yet 106 is pretty slow so it may not be you your car might be a turd
can u shift fast? or r u takin a week between gears
oh yeah and if u were smokin a c6 with those mods and u were stock then i can only make 1 conclusion he is a real bad driver cuz he should be putting down high 370 rwp maybe 380's
Last edited by rmitchell242; Nov 16, 2005 at 11:00 PM.
From: stafford country, va. Avatar: Me on turn 3 @ Bristol (The World's Fastest Half-Mile)
Originally Posted by Brett Hunter
Not sure if ya'll are interested in G-tech times but here are a few
1st run:
60' 2.389
0-60 mph 4.976
2nd run TC off:
60' 2.154
0-60 mph 4.314
3rd run TC and AH off:
60' 2.149
0-60 mph 4.221
I recently picked up a G-Tech Pro RR, I'm still trying to figure this darn thing out. The road racer mode doesn't make much sense to me but I'm sure it's in there for a reason, well anyhow. I'm suspecting something ain't completely correct since my best 0-60 according to the G-Tech Pro RR (mounted to the windshield) is an unbelieveable,
60'=1.830
60 mph=3.225
vehicle weight=3344
max power=353.8 @ 6482
max trq=407.9 @ 3615
so my question is, how accurate is the g-tech ? what do i need to do to make sure this thing is accurate ? It's kinda hard to believe these times, especially without any juice, slicks, turbo, supercharger, or any major mods beyond the standard exhaust and air intake.
From: stafford country, va. Avatar: Me on turn 3 @ Bristol (The World's Fastest Half-Mile)
Originally Posted by zippin zee
... torque management. ....
.... I also believe there is some variance in the degree of torque management and the style of the driver makes a huge difference in the way the car runs while it is in effect.
while TM is in effect ?? hhmmm.. so are you saying the computer makes adjustments based upon driving styles ? kinda like the rumor when Saturn first came out. I heard this rumor about the automatic transmission in the Saturn. Supposedly, it made adjustments to shift points, fuel, timing, etc. according to ones driving style. It took a little bit to learn your style, but after that it would just make minor changes, etc. based upon roadway feedback.
hhmm... is that logic in the c6 pcm.... whoa... hello christine...better be nice to her.....cars gone wild are not fun.....
... you are not going to see the full potential of these these cars in hot weather. ...
I'm suspecting something ain't completely correct since my best 0-60 according to the G-Tech Pro RR (mounted to the windshield) is an unbelieveable,
60'=1.830
60 mph=3.225
vehicle weight=3344
max power=353.8 @ 6482
max trq=407.9 @ 3615
so my question is, how accurate is the g-tech ? what do i need to do to make sure this thing is accurate ? It's kinda hard to believe these times, especially without any juice, slicks, turbo, supercharger, or any major mods beyond the standard exhaust and air intake.
I have the SS model instead of the RR model however I believe the only difference is the RR model allows you to d/l your runs onto your computer and will record for a longer time. The longer recordings I believe are for timing your runs around a track and seeing the G's you are pulling in the corners allowing you to examine your run and see if adjustments can be made.
As to the accuracy, mine seems to be dead on. If anything it is reading a little slow. Most of my factory runs were a little over 13.xx with the worst being 13.3x.
I think the reason yours is showing the wrong speeds is your car weight seems a little light. I have mine set at 3508. Remember to add your weight plus gas. A full tank of gas weighs well over 100 pounds. Also look at the pitch factor I lowered mine to 1 and like I said before it seems to be accurate.
The best way to verify it would be to run at the strip and compare to your timeslip. I believe there are directions on adjusting the pitch factor to match your time slip.
haha john force would probably drive a c6 stick about 13.50
but i drove mine 113mph at sac raceway it was in the 80's doubt it if you must
yet 106 is pretty slow so it may not be you your car might be a turd
can u shift fast? or r u takin a week between gears
oh yeah and if u were smokin a c6 with those mods and u were stock then i can only make 1 conclusion he is a real bad driver cuz he should be putting down high 370 rwp maybe 380's
The C6 just had an exhaust and aftermarket rims/tires, and yeah I beat him at the launch, he trapped 1 mph faster the stock C6, 3 tenths behind him. The one with the kooks was running 12.8 at 111mph, but said he wasn't running any faster than stock guy when his car was stock.
while TM is in effect ?? hhmmm.. so are you saying the computer makes adjustments based upon driving styles ? kinda like the rumor when Saturn first came out. I heard this rumor about the automatic transmission in the Saturn. Supposedly, it made adjustments to shift points, fuel, timing, etc. according to ones driving style. It took a little bit to learn your style, but after that it would just make minor changes, etc. based upon roadway feedback.
hhmm... is that logic in the c6 pcm.... whoa... hello christine...better be nice to her.....cars gone wild are not fun.....
Not exactly, what I am saying is I believe they made changes in the computer programing as the year progressed. The first time I took my car to the track the more agressively I drove, the slower it ran. So it is my opinion that someone that is very smooth and can keep from spinning the tires will get the resonable results from the stock car, other wise not.