question about Torco additive
Anyone here against its use? Assuming that the car is set up to require higher octane fuel.
I've always used race fuel in my last car when it called for higher than pump octane. But if this stuff works I'd give it a go. That is, after any future mods are made.
Thanks all

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1906302
Last edited by Tony B4; Jan 14, 2008 at 09:53 PM.






Someone turned me onto Torco about 5 or 6 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. I started selling a little on the side a few years ago, but it is in no way a "real" source of income.
I do defend it, since I've had VERY good luck with it.
You will find far more vocal people against it then for it in this section. I don't really think that most of the negative talk is from direct use though. Octane boosters in general have gotten a bad rap for years, and Torco has been grouped in with them.
There are some folks that no far more about the properties of gas and combustion then me, I'm more of a driver!!
I can tell you this though, Torco allows the gas it's added to to produce a far more effecient burn.
All I know is that a Quart of Torco is a hell of a lot easier to carry around then a 5 gallon jug of 100 octane, and it does just as well for less money...
JB
Preferable would be the availability of the proper octane that meets the need - in lieu of that availability, Torco works well.
Charlie
We can still get 93 octane fuel here in the Northeast and combined with the talents of a skilled tuner (like Julio at Cartek) one might find less need for Torco.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






We used to get 93 out here as well. It was when they went to 91, and a weak 91 at times, that I sought out higher octane for my Supercharged C5.

If one has Forced induction, or high compression, and really wants to up their octane, starting from 93, or even 94 gets you to around the 100 octane range with only one quart mixed in with about 9 gallons of gas.






I've run it for years, and don't have to change plugs with any real increased frequency, even when the plugs got discolored.



Found them in this link.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...post1562238647





Please accept my apology if I unintentionally stirred the pot for you (again, Ive never used it and dont know much about it, hence the reason for my question). I think I accidently stepped into something with some history behind it that I wasn't aware of between you guys.
Found them in this link.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...post1562238647




I have a few questions for you...
Do you have first hand knowledge that this was Torco?
Do you have any idea how long this engine burned oil and coated the tops of the pistons and valve faces with the carbon that then allowed the chemical to adhere.
Do you have any links to a non-oil burner that has used Torco for any length of time?
Thanks for all the help
I have a few questions for you...
Do you have first hand knowledge that this was Torco?
Do you have any idea how long this engine burned oil and coated the tops of the pistons and valve faces with the carbon that then allowed the chemical to adhere.
Do you have any links to a non-oil burner that has used Torco for any length of time?
Thanks for all the help
I just posted a link to an open thread and pictures that were asked to be seen from that link.
If you read the whole thread in the link, maybe you can pm the guy who made this claim and ask him these questions.
Hope this helps.
Last edited by Tony B4; Jan 15, 2008 at 01:43 PM.
Thanks for all the help and expertise















