barometric pressure




Highest elevation in NJ is 1803'.
Highest temperature ever recorded in NJ is 110 in 1936, but it didn't occur at the highest elevation.
The lowest BP ever recorded was actually across the river in PA at sea level in March 1993 and was 28.43.
Let's even use 99% humidity, so it's just short of raining.
If you took all four of the most extreme cases together it would only produce a DA of 8247.
Thanks for being a contributor of




This is all common knowledge and if your suffering from sour grapes because you live in CO, AZ, or CA ect.. and will never see those top times then come over here, show what you got and put down some impressive #'s. If not tough s#!t, shut up.
On the other hand if you race at any of these "ideal" tracks your kidding yourself if you think your that much better of a driver than everyone else who tracks their car regularly in other places.
Its no secret Dennis50nj set his sub 11 sec. mark when all of the factors came together to make for ideal conditions(great driving, track prep, weather). The same goes for Ranger,Jamie Furman, and whomever else you want to throw in the mix. There are many really good drivers here but don't think your s#!t don't stink because you race where you race.
I'll never understand the argument here because if you know dragracing its pretty obvious what it takes to make a great pass.
Last edited by walterm32; Nov 18, 2008 at 02:25 PM.

http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_da.htm
http://einstein.atmos.colostate.edu/.../Humidity.html
Last edited by 1.8t; Nov 18, 2008 at 02:36 PM.
As to my post, get over yourself. You would have found the "Uranus" comment hilarious if you were not the butt of the joke (pun intended). I'll bet you felt really good about yourself when you thumped your chest and insinuated that those that can't type and/or refuse to proofread are less intelligent than you. Someone had to point out that you were acting like a tool. I just happened to be the a$$hole to do it.
I pointed out to you that correction and DA are not the "end all, be all" of good 1/4 mile times. You have yet to dispute my assertions that it is the driver more than the rwhp (increased/decreased by DA) - in fact, you failed to address the same. And what about the transitive property? What about all of the other non DA variables? Should we ignore these because you say so? I suggest that it is all of these variables that comprise a pass down the 1320. Whether your 1320 experience is any good depends upon how well you use the hpr to pedal the car down the track.
I am willing to bet that someone with less hpr could go faster than Dennis at a track with a higher DA if the car was more purposebuilt for the 1/4. Dennis has still more room for improvement (within the external mods criteria and without adding 1 more rwhp) and does not need to rely on DA for an improvement in time if he wants to take this 1/4 quest any further.
Thanks for your explanation of DA. If you wish to take it further, please feel free to PM me.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
This is all common knowledge and if your suffering from sour grapes because you live in CO, AZ, or CA ect.. and will never see those top times then come over here, show what you got and put down some impressive #'s. If not tough s#!t, shut up.
On the other hand if you race at any of these "ideal" tracks your kidding yourself if you think your that much better of a driver than everyone else who tracks their car regularly in other places.
Its no secret Dennis50nj set his sub 11 sec. mark when all of the factors came together to make for ideal conditions(great driving, track prep, weather). The same goes for Ranger,Jamie Furman, and whomever else you want to throw in the mix. There are many really good drivers here but don't think your s#!t don't stink because you race where you race.
I'll never understand the argument here because if you know dragracing its pretty obvious what it takes to make a great pass.
Yeah, what he said. And trust me, my $h!t stinks - everyone in the office tells me so.
Ah gee, AirBusPilot, yer jus jelus u elitist over edyacated smert azz. Yeah, sure I am. lol I know most that have posted in this thread have seriously fast cars no matter where they run.
And be sure and get back to me with the location of that 8000' DA day in NJ. I want a location and date please, otherwise you're just b.s.'n.
Last edited by AirBusPilot; Nov 18, 2008 at 03:13 PM.
Don't worry, they say the same thing about my profession - attorney. And I usually resemble that remark. Difference is that I get alot of work out of it and Airbus just gets to stroke his ego.





http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...calculator.php
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_da.htm
http://einstein.atmos.colostate.edu/.../Humidity.html
So ... how does one factor in humidity when calculating density altitude?
[snip]
I am willing to bet that someone with less hpr could go faster than Dennis at a track with a higher DA if the car was more purposebuilt for the 1/4. Dennis has still more room for improvement (within the external mods criteria and without adding 1 more rwhp) and does not need to rely on DA for an improvement in time if he wants to take this 1/4 quest any further.




I read the thread for the information regarding DA and, following same, realized that you must be the most self important individual on this forum. I was just poking fun at you because you think you have the biggest brain on this forum. Might it be you that has the big, fragile ego? As point in fact, you are pompous enough to assume that I agreed with you. I respectfully suggest that you re-read my prior post, I disagreed with you but thanked you for a coherent, well thought out, detailed explanation of DA that you placed in a cocoon of crap. Go ahead, re-read my post. I conceeded nothing to you and, instead, suggested and continue to suggest that, at our power levels and set-ups, it is more the driver than the 20 additional rwhp. If you agreed with my DA explanation then you must agree that is not just 20 rwhp, figure 3% per 1000' DA power increase over worse DA, whatever that may be. I speak from experience - I had a 10 second Supra Turbo (MKIII, not MKIV) from 1989 - 1994. I have had equally fast cars throughout the years and, additionally, have been frequently asked by friends and strangers to make passes in their respective cars. I am no stranger to the track/racing - at least 1000 passes since 1986 - not to mention all the stupid street racing I did when I was much younger and reckless. I have beaten "faster" cars merely because I could drive right around them. Welcome to the club, and since you have a forced induction car you should also be aware that DA isn't near a major player because FI cars make their own atmosphere. Reread what I just said, I didn't say it didn't matter, but that the power differences between different DA's is not 3%, far less. I've owned a twin turbo LS2.
As to my post, get over yourself. I will if you'll stop crying, please. lolYou would have found the "Uranus" comment hilarious if you were not the butt of the joke (pun intended). I'll bet you felt really good about yourself when you thumped your chest and insinuated that those that can't type and/or refuse to proofread are less intelligent than you. Actually I was tired of trying to read text that someone was too lazy to proofread and the run on sentences made little sense.
Someone had to point out that you were acting like a tool. I just happened to be the a$$hole to do it. And I'll return the favor, you're acting like an idiot that felt so self important he had to inject himself in this discussion.

I pointed out to you that correction and DA are not the "end all, be all" of good 1/4 mile times. I never said it was, but the oversensitive types, like yourself, like to read into it as some sort of personal attack then try and take what I said to the illogical extreme or totally take what I said out of context, including just making up what I said.You have yet to dispute my assertions that it is the driver more than the rwhp (increased/decreased by DA) - in fact, you failed to address the same. Because it's so difficult to drive an automatic transmission car? There are plenty of variables, never disputed that, but you cannot deny the effects of DA without looking like an idiot. But you're doing a good job. And what about the transitive property? What about all of the other non DA variables? Should we ignore these because you say so? I suggest that it is all of these variables that comprise a pass down the 1320. And I would agree. Again. Whether your 1320 experience is any good depends upon how well you use the hpr to pedal the car down the track. Yep.
I am willing to bet that someone with less hpr could go faster than Dennis at a track with a higher DA if the car was more purposebuilt for the 1/4. Yet another red herring, we're not even remotely talking about that. Dennis has still more room for improvement (within the external mods criteria and without adding 1 more rwhp) and does not need to rely on DA for an improvement in time if he wants to take this 1/4 quest any further. Considering he's run in some of the best DA possible, I would have to agree, the weather ain't gonna get any better.
Thanks for your explanation of DA. Your welcome.If you wish to take it further, please feel free to PM me. Something you should've done originally.















I don`t care who you are, thats funny!
