When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Suspension setup on C6?
I need to know if this adjustment on a LS3 C6 Z51 will cause any issues with everyday handling, tire wear, or stability?
The car has polyuerathane offset control arm bushings allowing the car to have 2.5 degrees less caster than stock.
It also has a Hypercoil HD rear spring with about 15% more rate. A Z06 has 10% more spring rate. The left front tire has about 2 degrees negative camber.
If you can set your car up in the same manner as the car being referenced in the bolded quote? If so, there are always repercussions with going more aggressive with camber/caster/toe settings.
Track performance and handling typically come at the expense of longevity and wear of components, when utilizing stock suspension pieces that don't compensate for the adjustments. It's a give-take question that depends on your willingness to compromise.
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Originally Posted by SlickShoes
What are you asking?
If you can set your car up in the same manner as the car being referenced in the bolded quote? If so, there are always repercussions with going more aggressive with camber/caster/toe settings.
Track performance and handling typically come at the expense of longevity and wear of components, when utilizing stock suspension pieces that don't compensate for the adjustments. It's a give-take question that depends on your willingness to compromise.
I am purchasing a car that has these adjustments. I am concerned that it might alter normal performance. I was told that the car is set up for right turns but I am not an expert on this stuff.
I was also told that the bushings were installed backwards to soften the steering effort. Will this make the car less responsive? affect handling? etc?
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Originally Posted by haljensen
Yes, the current settings will affect handling, tire wear and stability.
Why are you buying a dedicated track car if you are going to street drive it? Track cars usually have much higher wear than a street car.
Is not a track care per say, just how the owner set it up. Will the poly bushings installed backwards cause any issues? I just dont understand all this stuff.
The owner set it up for TRACK use as evidenced by the settings. Have it put back to stock settings at the current owners expense before you buy it. I wouldn't buy a car that has been tracked enough that it had specific alignment settings that appear to be for track use only.
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Originally Posted by haljensen
The owner set it up for TRACK use as evidenced by the settings. Have it put back to stock settings at the current owners expense before you buy it. I wouldn't buy a car that has been tracked enough that it had specific alignment settings that appear to be for track use only.
Good input. The car only has 6500 miles on it and looks like new. I think the guy just liked it to handle well. I thought that it might make sense to have it put back to stock. I will ask the seller to do that.
Do the poly bushings installed backwards have any negative effects? Thanks
It wouldn't "handle well" with the alignment settings you listed. Less caster will cause a vague on center feel. 2° negative camber is a track setting for cornering. Stiffer rear springs are for track use and will cause the rear wheels to bounce around with loss of traction on uneven streets. Must be fun to drive on the street, the extreme negative camber and the caster setting causing understeer on left turns and the high rate rear springs causing oversteer on rough roads.
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12'-'13-'14-'15
Originally Posted by haljensen
I have no idea on the bushings.
It wouldn't "handle well" with the alignment settings you listed. Less caster will cause a vague on center feel. 2° negative camber is a track setting for cornering. Stiffer rear springs are for track use and will cause the rear wheels to bounce around with loss of traction on uneven streets. Must be fun to drive on the street, the extreme negative camber and the caster setting causing understeer on left turns and the high rate rear springs causing oversteer on rough roads.
Thank you. I guess maybe I need to speak to the tech that installed these bushings and did the alignment adjustments. Thanks for the input.
Cajun
Last edited by Cajun @ Edgyvette; Oct 27, 2009 at 10:40 PM.
Stock Z51s come from the factory made to understeer and have inferior handling to a Z06 a stiffer rear spring rate would help fix this problem.
So a stiffer rear spring will make the have less understeer than stock & put power down better than stock.
How well the car turns left has 90% to do with the alignment on the right side.
Drag racers typically install stiffer rear springs to help the car put power down.
Stock Z51s come from the factory made to understeer and have inferior handling to a Z06 a stiffer rear spring rate would help fix this problem.
So a stiffer rear spring will make the have less understeer than stock & put power down better than stock.
How well the car turns left has 90% to do with the alignment on the right side.
Drag racers typically install stiffer rear springs to help the car put power down.
Stock Z51's also have a factory spec of -.45 degrees camber, where the Z06 is -1.0..
I would be leery of buying a car that had a track specific setup in the suspension. Given the LS motors are having oiling issues at the track with 1.0 G loads you may just be buying an engine soon..
Good input. The car only has 6500 miles on it and looks like new. I think the guy just liked it to handle well. I thought that it might make sense to have it put back to stock. I will ask the seller to do that.
Do the poly bushings installed backwards have any negative effects? Thanks
Cajun
Having less caster than the car needs will rapidly wear the tires outside edge at the track and make the car more squirrelly. You need to have the bushings swapped to the correct orientation.
It depends on how & where u drive ur car on camber set up for the street.
The Z51 pushes with stock camber on the front, so adding more especially on the right front (since most freeway ramps are right hand) could make the tires last longer, it depends on how it is driven.
The car in this thread may have a lot of neg. camber on the left front but it does not say what it has anywhere else.
Stock Z51s come from the factory made to understeer and have inferior handling to a Z06 a stiffer rear spring rate would help fix this problem.
So a stiffer rear spring will make the have less understeer than stock & put power down better than stock.
How well the car turns left has 90% to do with the alignment on the right side. Drag racers typically install stiffer rear springs to help the car put power down.
I'm not a drag racer (I could be wrong) but I thought drag racers typically want a 'softer' rear suspension setup to encourage squat and minimize wheel-hop. The rebound stiffness could be stiffer but the 'softer' rear setup helps a drag racer at launch keep the rubber on the road. Similar to why drag racers often reduce rear tire pressures.
I need to know if this adjustment on a LS3 C6 Z51 will cause any issues with everyday handling, tire wear, or stability?
The car has polyuerathane offset control arm bushings allowing the car to have 2.5 degrees less caster than stock.
It also has a Hypercoil HD rear spring with about 15% more rate. A Z06 has 10% more spring rate. The left front tire has about 2 degrees negative camber.
Your car is going to ride like crap. All that negative camber in the rear will cut down on your available traction from a dig. Changing this back to stock is going to be alot of labor. I wouldn't buy it unless he spots you about 3 grand for your troubles. Just replacing all the bushings could run you 600-1000 just in labor. Inside tire wear will be VERY heavy until set back to atleast -1 but for the street I would run even less than that.
I'm not a drag racer (I could be wrong) but I thought drag racers typically want a 'softer' rear suspension setup to encourage squat and minimize wheel-hop. The rebound stiffness could be stiffer but the 'softer' rear setup helps a drag racer at launch keep the rubber on the road. Similar to why drag racers often reduce rear tire pressures.
I am not a drag racer either. Less tire PSI puts more rubber on the road for acceleration
And I have had cars in the past that could break the tires lose just smashing the gas pedal to the floor & after putting just a stiffer rear spring (keeping the front stock), the car was no longer able to break the rear tires loose. On axle hop, you got me on spring rates but I have done shock adjustments that have reduced it. I don't ever pop my clutch so I have not had many problems with hop.