CAM idle


Last edited by lwise4; Jan 20, 2010 at 01:01 PM. Reason: correction




If its a 114LSA then you have about 5 degrees overlap which is healthy but it should idle at 900, not 1900. The lobes are also aggressive ones which makes it act like a much larger XER lobe so it may be acting more like a 8 or 9 degree overlap cam due to low lift values during overlap being really aggressive. This is exactly why I limit overlap in cams.
What did the car dyno at?
Can you post a dyno sheet with a/f ratio?
Last edited by SpinMonster; Jan 20, 2010 at 08:23 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts




Was that the vengeance 500hp/457rwtq car with the FAST lSX?
400rwtq at 4100rpm should feel like boost coming on at that rpm.
Last edited by SpinMonster; Jan 20, 2010 at 08:31 AM.


If its a 114LSA then you have about 5 degrees overlap which is healthy but it should idle at 900, not 1900. The lobes are also aggressive ones which makes it act like a much larger XER lobe so it may be acting more like a 8 or 9 degree overlap cam due to low lift values during overlap being really aggressive. This is exactly why I limit overlap in cams.
What did the car dyno at?
Can you post a dyno sheet with a/f ratio?


I made a typo. The idle at cold is 1000 and when warm 900 but it bounces from 900 to 1000. Did you guys set this up to lope for Andrew? I know that He mentioned that He wanted a lope when He had the work done. If so can a tune take the lope out or am I still looking at a CAM change?
Mike
Give me a call if we can help you out.
I made a typo. The idle at cold is 1000 and when warm 900 but it bounces from 900 to 1000. Did you guys set this up to lope for Andrew? I know that He mentioned that He wanted a lope when He had the work done. If so can a tune take the lope out or am I still looking at a CAM change?




I got vastly different results with the same durations and different lobes
I used a 230XER/234XER 114
230XFI/236XFI 1145+2 (horrible result)
230XFI/230XFI 115+2
you cant mix and match these things thinking youre going to outdo tuners who install 8 versions of the same cam to dial it in.
Go with a proven cam instead of trying to rethink it for better results.
I have seen a 232/234 114 (looks like the original TQer 2 cam) not make more than 485rwhp and its 5 degrees overlap.
Why not just use a cam that has made 500rwhp many times by independent installers and tuners?
Another forum member just got 501rwhp and 455rwtq with the 230XFI/234XER 114+2 and it made 400rwtq at 3477rpm. His results echo AndrewZPSU's result and is the 9th car to hit this number on an LS3. At 4 degrees overlap its a winner all around. He will be posting his results and dyno sheet. Personally I think al you get going bigger on the intake and having more overlap is self defeating. It doesnt get more power down so why go bigger?
If you want the bigger cam I more with, PM me for details. It is also low overlap.








