When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Congrats Chaz, It looks like some of the guys are going to get active
again to top a 10.4x. I hope it is completely valid in every respect after the disappointment you had in 2009. I think those ETP Heads have a little
magic in them and there are reasons why they are a bit better than the TFS. From what I understand they are no longer made. would you post the Cam specs or is it a Cartek Cam ? Good going . What's your Dyno numbers.
Leon
Thanks
If ARP rod bolts make it invalid so be it, other than the rod bolts there's nothing else done to the short block. I don't remember the exact Cam specs.
C6 LS2 M6
Stock bottom NA.
Best Today @ ETown NJ.
10.519 @ 134.44 1.543 60 ft.
10.480 @ 134.07 1.490 60 ft.
Slight lift off throttle all 3 shifts.
I would like to shift without lifting, but
Drove 98 miles to PA Nov 2010, 98 miles back from PA. 04/01/11,
37 miles to the track today, and 37 miles back home.
Thanks
Pop
My Son Joe.
Jay A.
Cartek Tuned.
What kind of fuel are you running? Is it a "race fuel only" tune?
Those are some great numbers. Congrats!!!! I can't wait to get my car to the track. For some reason something always keeps me from going.
Thanks
If ARP rod bolts make it invalid so be it, other than the rod bolts there's nothing else done to the short block. I don't remember the exact Cam specs.
I just jumped in on this discussion...Your original opening specs listed a stock bottom end. Changing the rod bolts makes for a safer engine but doesn't change the performance at all. Did I miss the actual E.T. slip from the track..I would love to see the 1/8 mile E.T. as well as the the MPH for these record breaking runs..
You list that it's "Fully Loaded" including rollbar, aftermarket amp and sub but that your raceweight is 3140....how does that figure? What weight reduction was done to the car?
What cam specs are you using? UD pulley with it?
Are the heads straight out of the box?
What type of exhaust setup?
My car is efficient. lighter brakes, wheels, race seats, battery, and even the exhaust is lighter, I'm 175 lbs.
Don't remember the exact cam specs, UD pulley, Heads out of the box and milled only, approx 11.5 compression.
What kind of fuel are you running? Is it a "race fuel only" tune?
Those are some great numbers. Congrats!!!! I can't wait to get my car to the track. For some reason something always keeps me from going.
Thanks
The tune is set up for mix fuel, 95 to 97 octane. I run 93 oct on the street and keep the rpms below 5,500 or at least try, and with the mix fuel i shift at 7k-7.1k rpm.
I just jumped in on this discussion...Your original opening specs listed a stock bottom end. Changing the rod bolts makes for a safer engine but doesn't change the performance at all. Did I miss the actual E.T. slip from the track..I would love to see the 1/8 mile E.T. as well as the the MPH for these record breaking runs..
The 1/8 ET 6.762 @ 103.62, i'm trying to post my time slip. Thanks for the imfo.
I just jumped in on this discussion...Your original opening specs listed a stock bottom end. Changing the rod bolts makes for a safer engine but doesn't change the performance at all. Did I miss the actual E.T. slip from the track..I would love to see the 1/8 mile E.T. as well as the the MPH for these record breaking runs..
PM sent
I'll try and post my time slip by 9:00 pm.