new setup
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts







BTW, you just know you're going to take a lot of flak if you play in the internals arena again, after once having a bottle.
Seeing that you heavily questioned AndrewZPSU about crossing a line and back again and accused the Subfloor of the same, you'll always be suspected of the same shenanigans, whether true or false.

BTW, you just know you're going to take a lot of flak if you play in the internals arena again, after once having a bottle.
Seeing that you heavily questioned AndrewZPSU about crossing a line and back again and accused the Subfloor of the same, you'll always be suspected of the same shenanigans, whether true or false.
went an 11.098 at 99.14 couldn't hook, last pass i went 10.65 at 129.78 on only a 1.553 60 ft went faster from the 330 on to the 1/4 than any other previous passes but a tenth + slower 60 ft, and yes there was no bottle in the car just empty brackets and line, and yes it was videoed going threw the burnout box to the finish line with a video in the back window
(keep in mind that the car has cut 1.43 and 1.41 sixty foots in the past). Those are almost strong running 'manual transmission' type traps.
All things considered, that 10.65 was a pretty good pass overall. Once you find that 'full throttle dead hook' again (easier said than done
) I think the car might hit some serious ETs.
There were also quite a few Corvette Forum members/witnesses (myself included) right there in the lanes to verify it as well.


Maybe I missed it, but can you give a rundown of your mods now? You were 10.62 as a bolt-on car and now you've gone 10.5 with the cam? What all is done to it?
Last edited by dennis50nj; Mar 29, 2012 at 12:24 PM.
The main difference there was the drivers, when it went 10.62 as an LS2 bolt ons only car it was being piloted by a 160-165 pound driver but on the car's best (so far) 10.59 cam only pass Dennis himself was driving and likely will be doing all of the driving from now on as well.
I think Dennis weighed almost 300 pounds
back then (late 2009) and is probably still over 270+ now, not the best recipe for low sixty foots/low ETs.
The way the car was set up (some slight variances in the weight of which supporting parts were used etc.) and the air between the two track visits wasn't exactly the same either (I think it was slightly better air on the bolt on pass).
The trap speeds and sixty foots tell some of the story there as well:
Bolt ons = 1.41 sixty foot and 126+mph with 160 pound driver.
Cam only = 1.45 sixty foot and 130+mph with a 300 pound driver.
So the cam is working well, he just needs to get the car back to it's former crazy low short times again and it could maybe go a 10.4 NA even with him driving.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Last edited by LS1LT1; Mar 29, 2012 at 01:39 PM.


With a little tweaking, learning to drive, skinnies, new tune, etc, the car now goes 10s consistently.











