When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So the Michelin SS provides the biggest weight reduction with a four corner total of -12lbs. Twelve lbs is twelve lbs but I think many think they're dropping 20+lbs most of the time; obviously not the case.
*Just an informative post with facts for reference. Not knocking on anyone.
When I looked up the weight of the Gen-1 F1 Runflats I was surprised how much heavier they are than the Pilot SS's, so yes 4 tires & 4 rotors combined @ 48lbs.
Originally Posted by HOXXOH
I'd be surprised if you could drop 48# by different rotors. Stock fronts weigh 26# each and just for grins, let's assume the rears are 22#. That's 96# for the whole car. Do you really think you can get rotors at half the stock weight?
When I looked up the weight of the Gen-1 F1 Runflats I was surprised how much heavier they are than the Pilot SS's, so yes 4 tires & 4 rotors combined @ 48lbs.
According to Leavinu the tires are -12# and the Z06 forum shows a -11# for DBA5000 fronts. That's 23#, which leaves a 25# reduction for the rear rotors. Since the stock rears are 19.9# each, the BDA5000 rears would have to weigh 7.4# each to total a 48# saving.
Care to post the specific source of your info?
Noticing any part of a 48# weight reduction will be mostly felt by the person involved in the process of changing the rotors, not when driving the car.
According to Leavinu the tires are -12# and the Z06 forum shows a -11# for DBA5000 fronts. That's 23#, which leaves a 25# reduction for the rear rotors. Since the stock rears are 19.9# each, the BDA5000 rears would have to weigh 7.4# each to total a 48# saving.
Care to post the specific source of your info?
Noticing any part of a 48# weight reduction will be mostly felt by the person involved in the process of changing the rotors, not when driving the car.
I completely disagree. Rotating mass is one of the biggest sources of what is called power-train loss, and lower the rotating mass, less you'd lose from crank to the wheels. Some say rotating mass is actually worth a few times mass from anywhere else in the car.
Since the stock rears are 19.9# each, the BDA5000 rears would have to weigh 7.4# each to total a 48# saving.
If he were to opt for rear rotors that do NOT retain the parking brake there is good savings to be had although I don't recall exact numbers. If keeping the parking brake the weight loss is there but minimal, meaning a couple of lbs each side at best from what I recall.
Just food for thought before spending the money on them.
The first weight reduction options I recommend is to get GTO spares up front and take out the passenger seat. Those two items alone got me a very consistent 1.5-.2 and about 2 mph, weather independent.
According to Tire Rack tire weights & OEM size base car tire sizes. Changing from the stock F1's to non-runflat PS2's saves a total of 14#'s in rotational weight
BTW - oldmansan, as he mentioned above, has a great small battery write up here in C6 tech
I completely disagree. Rotating mass is one of the biggest sources of what is called power-train loss, and lower the rotating mass, less you'd lose from crank to the wheels. Some say rotating mass is actually worth a few times mass from anywhere else in the car.
Is this the old rotating mass story that no one seems to know the real numbers?
That's a bigger story than every 100# reduction is worth a tenth in the quarter and 1 more MPG.
I can pretty much guarantee you can't feel a 48# difference or even a 100# difference. Just like you can't feel a tenth in the 1/4 mile.
The frame is lighter, but the rotors, calipers, wheels, and tires are heavier. Kinda makes you wonder about the rotating weight theory, doesn't it?
I was talking about GM choosing to jack up pricing of Z06 by about $10K just to remove 100 lbs; was not comparing it to Grand Sport.
This is no theory; have you every heard of the term "moment of inertia"? If not, what about momentum? OK if still not, have you heard of those flywheels that replace the passenger seats in prototype hybrid-racer Porsches being tested, where the flywheel is used to store energy instead of batteries? Do you know how on Earth it stores energy in a flywheel? My guts are telling me your guts would not believe in such a wizardry.
BTW - oldmansan, as he mentioned above, has a great small battery write up here in C6 tech
Thanks. The next battery I'll purchase will be a Shorai. I have one in my ZX10R and not only did it save major weight, but it doesn't need a battery tender. Best battery I've ever used.
I was talking about GM choosing to jack up pricing of Z06 by about $10K just to remove 100 lbs; was not comparing it to Grand Sport.
This is no theory; have you every heard of the term "moment of inertia"? If not, what about momentum? OK if still not, have you heard of those flywheels that replace the passenger seats in prototype hybrid-racer Porsches being tested, where the flywheel is used to store energy instead of batteries? Do you know how on Earth it stores energy in a flywheel? My guts are telling me your guts would not believe in such a wizardry.
Do a little research on the difference between a Z06, a GS, and a base Vette. $10K for 100#???
Moment of inertia? Oh yeah! I think it was 7th grade the first time I heard it. Understood the principle way before I knew the name. Maybe by being a mechanical engineer and designer for so many years it causes me to forget some of those basics. NOT!
Google French bus flywheel power to see some real world vehicle applications that existed about 50 years ago.
Stick around for a while, there's a lot to learn here.
Do a little research on the difference between a Z06, a GS, and a base Vette. $10K for 100#???
Moment of inertia? Oh yeah! I think it was 7th grade the first time I heard it. Understood the principle way before I knew the name. Maybe by being a mechanical engineer and designer for so many years it causes me to forget some of those basics. NOT!
Google French bus flywheel power to see some real world vehicle applications that existed about 50 years ago.
Stick around for a while, there's a lot to learn here.
The price difference between Z06 and GS is not $10K; it's rather $20K. Some of that goes to the engine, and if we take crate engine pricing as a guide, at least $10K goes to the chassis improvements to make it lighter. If you still don't understand, I rest my case.
If you know what moment of inertia means, it makes your ignorance of it even more nonsense. Oh, and I am also an engineer. Keep rolling on the floor
Thanks. The next battery I'll purchase will be a Shorai. I have one in my ZX10R and not only did it save major weight, but it doesn't need a battery tender. Best battery I've ever used.
Will that thing even crank a C6? I checked out the page and dont see anywhere to identify a "car" battery. Interesting battery, never heard of it before.
And just for the record, I can 'feel' a tenth of a second in the quarter mile. I've made enough passes in my car to know when I've made a good pass and when the car is feeling strong.
And just for the record, I can 'feel' a tenth of a second in the quarter mile. I've made enough passes in my car to know when I've made a good pass and when the car is feeling strong.
I know the difference between a 1.6 60 foot and a 1.5 for sure.
If that hood drops you're sunk. You want to feel like you are pulling a wheelie through the launch process.
Thanks. The next battery I'll purchase will be a Shorai. I have one in my ZX10R and not only did it save major weight, but it doesn't need a battery tender. Best battery I've ever used.
Cool - I'm interested & I know you are a thorough researcher - have you had a chance to research which one would be the correct size with the terminals in the correct position? The Deka only lasted so long on a car that isn't driven every day.