When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I will be dropping my car off monday for a custom spec cam and stal convertor install. My car currently has a cai, headers, full exhaust, and will get a cam and 3200 stall.
I want a big nasty cam. My local ls expert suggested that he custom spec me a cam- 234 / 242 - .629" / .620" 113 +4
What do you guys think this will produce? I dont want anything mild.
I will be dropping my car off monday for a custom spec cam and stal convertor install. My car currently has a cai, headers, full exhaust, and will get a cam and 3200 stall.
I want a big nasty cam. My local ls expert suggested that he custom spec me a cam- 234 / 242 - .629" / .620" 113 +4
What do you guys think this will produce? I dont want anything mild.
That camshaft will need a 3600 (or a little higher) stall. A lot of folks don't realize how badly performance can suffer if the engine combo & converter are not matched properly.
My personal opinion? That cam is a little on the large side and doesn't have quite enough split.
Recently we took in an 08 C6 from another shop with a 238/248 camshaft in it. The customer hated the driveability and lack of power down low. We removed that cam and the silly heavy Comp 921 valve springs. Reinstalled was one of our camshafts (224/234) and a set of PSI 1511ML Beehives. The result? The car picked up 40ft lbs of TQ across the board and make almost the same peak RWHP number. High rpm was MUCH more stable.
As soon as I have time to overlay the graphs I'll post them, but this same cam did 490/470 in a 5th gen Camaro.
This is a sound clip of what it sounds like. You don't need a "big nasty" cam to sound good...
And FWIW, I don't sell cams nor make profit on them. Our cams are cut by our vendor and paid for by the customer directly so this isn't a sales pitch. Just dropping some knowledge on what results we see every day. Hope this helps.
Recently we took in an 08 C6 from another shop with a 238/248 camshaft in it. The customer hated the driveability and lack of power down low. We removed that cam and the silly heavy Comp 921 valve springs. Reinstalled was one of our camshafts (224/234) and a set of PSI 1511ML Beehives. The result? The car picked up 40ft lbs of TQ across the board and make almost the same peak RWHP number. High rpm was MUCH more stable.
This is good advice. I don't know what has happened in the LS world, but there are a lot of bad ideas that have been followed by the masses and passed off as the "correct" way of doing it. Going large duration and retarding it a mile to make it clear is an odd way of doing things IMO
I agree without the supporting mods can actually be slower at the track, if I was going to run that cam I'd suggest a 4k stall and shifting at 7k as mentioned...average power is what gets you down the track faster and as Josh mentioned a smaller cam sometimes does that, which allows you can run a smaller stall in an auto and not shift have to shift as high
This is good advice. I don't know what has happened in the LS world, but there are a lot of bad ideas that have been followed by the masses and passed off as the "correct" way of doing it. Going large duration and retarding it a mile to make it clear is an odd way of doing things IMO
you guys are talking about 3800 and 4000 stalls......i want to be able to drive this to the gas station....every local shop ive talked to says 3200 is plenty. Not to mention the installer holds the record for the fastest pump gas car. he must know his stuff...
Not to mention the installer holds the record for the fastest pump gas car. he must know his stuff...
Race cars and street cars share what in common? I don't know why you made the thread you did if you already knew that your guy knows it all? You asked for opinions without actually wanting to hear any? Your car will be awesome, no matter what you read in this thread, I am sure you will love it.
Race cars and street cars share what in common? I don't know why you made the thread you did if you already knew that your guy knows it all? You asked for opinions without actually wanting to hear any? Your car will be awesome, no matter what you read in this thread, I am sure you will love it.
-Cody
I do want to hear opinions...on what i asked for opinions on...the cam. Somehow my stall cam into question. This is a street car so no one in their right mind would but a 3800 or 4000 stall in a car they want to drive to work....
But yes i will love it either way. I was just hoping someone with a similar cam/setup would chime in. Thats what this forum is all about
This is good advice. I don't know what has happened in the LS world, but there are a lot of bad ideas that have been followed by the masses and passed off as the "correct" way of doing it. Going large duration and retarding it a mile to make it clear is an odd way of doing things IMO
I blame the internet marketing & hype for these issues. Certain vendors open a Comp catalog, point at some big nasty camshaft and say "Hey I'm gonna put a stupid nickname on that and sell it to everybody!" without any thought process behind it. Irks the **** outta me.
I guess I'm too old fashioned. I actually like to match all the parts together to make a good combination and dyno numbers are not my #1 concern. *shrug*
That camshaft will need a 3600 (or a little higher) stall. A lot of folks don't realize how badly performance can suffer if the engine combo & converter are not matched properly.
My personal opinion? That cam is a little on the large side and doesn't have quite enough split.
Recently we took in an 08 C6 from another shop with a 238/248 camshaft in it. The customer hated the driveability and lack of power down low. We removed that cam and the silly heavy Comp 921 valve springs. Reinstalled was one of our camshafts (224/234) and a set of PSI 1511ML Beehives. The result? The car picked up 40ft lbs of TQ across the board and make almost the same peak RWHP number. High rpm was MUCH more stable.
As soon as I have time to overlay the graphs I'll post them, but this same cam did 490/470 in a 5th gen Camaro.
This is a sound clip of what it sounds like. You don't need a "big nasty" cam to sound good...
And FWIW, I don't sell cams nor make profit on them. Our cams are cut by our vendor and paid for by the customer directly so this isn't a sales pitch. Just dropping some knowledge on what results we see every day. Hope this helps.
I blame the internet marketing & hype for these issues. Certain vendors open a Comp catalog, point at some big nasty camshaft and say "Hey I'm gonna put a stupid nickname on that and sell it to everybody!" without any thought process behind it. Irks the **** outta me.
I guess I'm too old fashioned. I actually like to match all the parts together to make a good combination and dyno numbers are not my #1 concern. *shrug*
Haha, good to know I am not alone! The biggest irk for me is when someone will say "you need a 114-115* LSA" without any mention of any other spec. Like an LSA number is relevant to anything by itself... I personally place the lobes, then I calculate the LSA result, and it is whatever it happens to be. LSA is a result, not a design characteristic.
I do want to hear opinions...on what i asked for opinions on...the cam. Somehow my stall cam into question. This is a street car so no one in their right mind would but a 3800 or 4000 stall in a car they want to drive to work....
But yes i will love it either way. I was just hoping someone with a similar cam/setup would chime in. Thats what this forum is all about
The stall came into the equation because it is a major part of it. Cam and stall go together like cars and tires. If you want your combo to be as efficient as possible you should match them or just do what you want and delete the thread.