When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have an 05 C^ and the front wheels are 5 spoke polished aluminium... I now have 18" taken off an 04.. they are 18" x9.5" .....
However I just made a big HP increase, & was told I need 17" x 9 1/2" so I could get a larger sidewall....
I have the Z51 option on my car, and want to get a pair of 17" wheels that sort of match the front (No wagon wheels)
Does anyone know of a 17" 5 spoke polished aluminum wheel that will fit on the rear of my car..?? I was told the front wheel from a 2001 - 2004 Zo6 would fit but its a 10 spoke five rows of two spokes ??
The OEM wheel on my car is 7" backspace with a +54 offset.... As you can tell I'm completely lost here.. but I don't want to spend $225 per wheel.. Aftermarket also would be Fine !!
Thanks if anyone who knows more than me can help..
Not knowing the exact style you're looking for I imagine you'll find a matching wheel here at forum sponsor JW Motoring where they have a selection of 17x9.5" 54 mm offset reproduction wheels.
Not knowing the exact style you're looking for I imagine you'll find a matching wheel here at forum sponsor JW Motoring where they have a selection of 17x9.5" 54 mm offset reproduction wheels.
--Dan
Thank You... That site is GREAT & has exactly what I want... I'll calling them tomorrow (Mon) I need 17" wheels to put on the back of my C6 (I drag Race it) and plan on using 275/40x17" with a 5 spoke (thin) to match the fronts...
I think the wheel that jpee is looking for is the OEM/factory C5 Y2k wheels in 17x8.5 if anyone knows of a pair available...along with a set of 275-40-17 drag radials it's a very popular/common set up among base C6 owners.
I think the wheel that jpee is looking for is the OEM/factory C5 Y2k wheels in 17x8.5 if anyone knows of a pair available...along with a set of 275-40-17 drag radials it's a very popular/common set up among base C6 owners.
thanks Marc.... I'll do a little homework tomorrow and see what I can find...right now I'm using 305/35x18" MT (read expensive $325 each) I "Might" get by because I'm only using a 2800 converter.. but Julio told me with the 4" stroke my TQ will go wayyy up...and the 18" may not hold it, & I'll go 17" with a 275/40 tire...
I think the wheel that jpee is looking for is the OEM/factory C5 Y2k wheels in 17x8.5 if anyone knows of a pair available...along with a set of 275-40-17 drag radials it's a very popular/common set up among base C6 owners.
He needs a 17 x 9.5 not 8.5 for those tires. I know he said thin spokes, but I think he wants to match his stock fronts, which are classic 5-spoke wheels.
Ideally, yes, 9.5" (or even just 9") is what he should be using.
People don't think that inch or even half inch makes a difference and on a near stock/lightly modded car it doesn't matter at all. But once things get serious, that slightly sucked in sidewall (ie: a 275 on a 8.5" rim) will not hook as needed.
I do think that even with this new engine, jpee will still be able to hook with only an 8.5" wide rim because his converter won't be hitting all that hard (his converter and 3.15 gears will likely make what should be a potentially 10.4 second car run only 10.8s/10.9s unfortunately). Even his 18s might still work.
But if he ever steps up to a hard hitting converter he will need ALL of the advantages that a 9" or 9.5" wide rim will offer.
I had mentioned those to jpee as well but he wants polished, not chrome and aftermarket/replica wheels tend to weigh more than factory ones as well. But if there was a polished 17x9.5 2005-2007 C6 rim in a 54mm to 65mm offset available in pairs for a decent price, that would be a great option.
Ideally, yes, 9.5" (or even just 9") is what he should be using.
People don't think that inch or even half inch makes a difference and on a near stock/lightly modded car it doesn't matter at all. But once things get serious, that slightly sucked in sidewall (ie: a 275 on a 8.5" rim) will not hook as needed.
I do think that even with this new engine, jpee will still be able to hook with only an 8.5" wide rim because his converter won't be hitting all that hard (his converter and 3.15 gears will likely make what should be a potentially 10.4 second car run only 10.8s/10.9s unfortunately). Even his 18s might still work.
But if he ever steps up to a hard hitting converter he will need ALL of the advantages that a 9" or 9.5" wide rim will offer.
I had mentioned those to jpee as well but he wants polished, not chrome and aftermarket/replica wheels tend to weigh more than factory ones as well. But if there was a polished 17x9.5 2005-2007 C6 rim in a 54mm to 65mm offset available in pairs for a decent price, that would be a great option.
He may want to weigh several options before making a decision, starting with tire size. Some of the other factors are:
Price and availability of tires.
Price of wheels.
Weight of wheels.
Size and style of front wheels.
Concerns of TC/ABS/AH issues caused by non-conforming front to rear size ratios.
TPS
Possibly changing wheels at the track to avoid wear and other problems.
Remembering that that are no extra benefits on a timeslip for how good it looks.
He may want to weigh several options before making a decision, starting with tire size. Some of the other factors are:
Price and availability of tires.
Price of wheels.
Weight of wheels.
Size and style of front wheels.
Concerns of TC/ABS/AH issues caused by non-conforming front to rear size ratios.
TPS
Possibly changing wheels at the track to avoid wear and other problems. Remembering that that are no extra benefits on a timeslip for how good it looks.
Especially with that last part LOL.
I'm sure we both agree that using a front (17x9.5) C5 Z06 rim instead of a base C5 thin spoke for his rear drag wheels would be the better choice here but jpee wants it to look 'close' in appearance to the stock fronts, ya know, for that 'bracket/index race' winner's circle photo LOL.
He won't ever run skinnies up front and he won't ever change tires while at the track (which I don't blame him for, I'd done it a couple of times over the years and hated it, especially on those humid 95+ degree days ). But if he did, he could run the Hoosiers instead of the M/Ts and avoid that 200 mile 'drag radial eating' round trip on his race tires every few weekends.
Especially with that last part LOL.
I'm sure we both agree that using a front (17x9.5) C5 Z06 rim instead of a base C5 thin spoke for his rear drag wheels would be the better choice here but jpee wants it to look 'close' in appearance to the stock fronts, ya know, for that 'bracket/index race' winner's circle photo LOL.
He won't ever run skinnies up front and he won't ever change tires while at the track (which I don't blame him for, I'd done it a couple of times over the years and hated it, especially on those humid 95+ degree days ). But if he did, he could run the Hoosiers instead of the M/Ts and avoid that 200 mile 'drag radial eating' round trip on his race tires every few weekends.
I sent him a link to C6 repros 17 x 9.5 x 65mm offset that will be exactly the offset he needs
I think the wheel that jpee is looking for is the OEM/factory C5 Y2k wheels in 17x8.5 if anyone knows of a pair available...along with a set of 275-40-17 drag radials it's a very popular/common set up among base C6 owners.
I ran standard C5 front wheels from a 2002 (the polished 5 spokers) with 275/40/17 for years with no problems. The 8.5" width was no problem.
I'd look for a used set of C5 fronts from a 2000-2004, will be cheaper than new repros and lighter too.
I sent him a link to C6 repros 17 x 9.5 x 65mm offset that will be exactly the offset he needs
And those are an exact match too, actual C6 style spokes.
Only downsides are that they might only be available in chrome not polished and also will weigh slightly more, but close enough.
Originally Posted by Joe_G
I ran standard C5 front wheels from a 2002 (the polished 5 spokers) with 275/40/17 for years with no problems. The 8.5" width was no problem.
I'd look for a used set of C5 fronts from a 2000-2004, will be cheaper than new repros and lighter too.
And while jpee will be making more power/torque and often running in cooler temps than you did, he's also a softer hitting automatic whereas you did it with a manual.
So I agree that he should be fine even with the 8.5s.
Another cheaper tire option that shouldn't require retuning and will work with your current wheels while providing almost as much sidewall is a M/T 265/40r18. Not sure it'll be enough with new power, but you guys aren't lacking on prep from when I remember running up there.
Sorry for my ignorance, but why would he need to re-tune?
Thanks!
Because the computer (the part the monitors the active handling) checks to see all 4 wheels are turning at the correct rpm.. if I put a smaller or larger rear wheel the computer will think it is either spinning (for a smaller diameter wheel) and activate the "Active handling"
It will either reduce power or apply breaks to try to get the correct rpm of each wheel...
Sorry for my ignorance, but why would he need to re-tune?
Thanks!
The transmission shift points are based on RPM AND speed - when you change tire sizes you must change the speed shift points or it'll hit the rev limiter. At least in the A4 like Jpee has.
And it's not exactly as you would expect - you'd figure if you drop 10% tire size you could drop shift speed 10% and it would work, but it doesn't work that way. With Justasheet he and I must have run 5-6 passes to get it right on his car coming from 18" drag radials to 17". I'd drop it 3 mph and it wasn't enough - we ended up moving it more than I expected to do, and I called Jeremy Preston during the process and he said it wasn't as clear cut as you'd expect to change it, it takes a little trial and error. It was my first time, next time I think i could do it in 2 passes.
Jpee it's not related to the difference in tire size. If you make the rear tires bigger you'll get the "engine drag control
active" message at high rpms when you let off the gas as the car thinks the rear tires are slipping. Changing to 305 or 345 tires will do this if you don't change the fronts to taller tires. In my experience (and I have 7 years of it now) changing to the short 275/40/17 DR's doesn't have any effect on the "engine drag control" or active handling.
The transmission shift points are based on RPM AND speed - when you change tire sizes you must change the speed shift points or it'll hit the rev limiter. At least in the A4 like Jpee has.
And it's not exactly as you would expect - you'd figure if you drop 10% tire size you could drop shift speed 10% and it would work, but it doesn't work that way. With Justasheet he and I must have run 5-6 passes to get it right on his car coming from 18" drag radials to 17". I'd drop it 3 mph and it wasn't enough - we ended up moving it more than I expected to do, and I called Jeremy Preston during the process and he said it wasn't as clear cut as you'd expect to change it, it takes a little trial and error. It was my first time, next time I think i could do it in 2 passes.
Jpee it's not related to the difference in tire size. If you make the rear tires bigger you'll get the "engine drag control
active" message at high rpms when you let off the gas as the car thinks the rear tires are slipping. Changing to 305 or 345 tires will do this if you don't change the fronts to taller tires. In my experience (and I have 7 years of it now) changing to the short 275/40/17 DR's doesn't have any effect on the "engine drag control" or active handling.
I have switched to 305/35x18" both with Nitto 555 and with MT and never had any active handling show up on my DIC... I "think" the 305/35x18" is close enough to the OEM tire so the active handling wont kick in...
I've been using that size since I got the car...& thats whats on it now.. I'm supposed to bring it to Cartek on Fri for some fine tuning and a dyno pull.. but not sure if the weather will cooperate.. if its bad I'll bring it next week..I already have 250 miles on the new motor but have
NOT gone FULL THROTTLE yet.. it just starts to spin the MT .. but I expected that with the COLD roads.. etc...
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.