C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Failed Lifter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2014 | 12:22 PM
  #41  
orange rush's Avatar
orange rush
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth Tx
Default

Originally Posted by 5 Liter Eater
Sooo I'm going to throw this out there because you mentioned the ticking only starts after it warms up. I had this same symptom a while back after a cam swap and I thought the same thing, lifters. turns out I pinched the o-ring on the oil pump pickup. So it was sucking in air and oil and frothing the oil up. My tick seemed like it was coming from #7. It couldn't stay pumped up because of the airated oil.

I know it means dropping the cradle and pulling your balancer off again but I would strongly suggest you check the o-ring on the oil pump pickup as our symptoms seem exactly the same.

Man, I hope thats not the issue. Tons of work to do over again if thats the issue. Thanks for the help however. Hope to have it fired up by Sunday so I will report my findings.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #42  
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,472
Likes: 38
From: Houston TX
St. Jude Donor '11
Default

If it still does it after replacing the lifters then I'd say it's definitely the issue.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2014 | 12:32 PM
  #43  
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,472
Likes: 38
From: Houston TX
St. Jude Donor '11
Default

Here's the thread for reference. Check it out.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...-cam-swap.html
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2014 | 04:06 PM
  #44  
orange rush's Avatar
orange rush
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth Tx
Default

Hey 5, I looked at your thread and now Im scratching my head. Sure hope that not the prob even though we have similar problems. I did however make sure I took the o-ring out of the pump and reinstall it over the pickup tube. It was covered in oil too, so I certain it didnt bind. But like you say, if lifters dont solve it, thats my next thing to troubleshoot.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2014 | 04:21 PM
  #45  
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,472
Likes: 38
From: Houston TX
St. Jude Donor '11
Default

Good luck!
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 04:35 PM
  #46  
briancb1's Avatar
briancb1
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 932
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Mark2009
Here is how to check pushrod length with adjustable pushrod:

1) Install pushrod and rocker arm (loose).

2) Snug up rocker arm bolt to trunnion, making sure that pushrod remains loose (adjust it shorter if need be).

3) Once rocker arm bolt is snug to trunnion (torque if you like, not really needed), use your fingers to unscrew the adjustable pushrod until it is snug between the rocker arm and the lifter. You may have to fiddle a bit, loosening it until there is just a little up-and-down play and then screwing it out a bit until you just take out all the up-and-down slack between the lifter and the rocker arm.

This is your zero-preload pushrod length.

If you can figure out how many turns the pushrod has gone thru to figure out the length of it, more power to ya. I'd just remove the pushrod (without disturbing it) and measure the length with an 8" dial caliper, then subtract about .020" (this is a 'fudge factor') to get the actual gauge length that pushrod manufacturers use to indcate pushrod length (but has nothing to do with the real length of the pushrod... i.e., a GM 7.800" pushrod is actually about 7.821" long if you measure it with a dial caliper).

Don't ask me why they do it this way. Ask them

You can confirm this by measuring a stock pushrod with an 8" dial caliper. You should measure about .020 longer than advertised.

So, back to the adjustable pushrod -- if it measures 7.396" (with a dial caliper) after being set for zero lash, then subtract that .021 fudge factor for 7.375" 'gauge length' pushrod for zero lash. If you want .075 preload, then add that to the zero lash figure and order a set of 7.450" pushrods (7.375 + .075).

Then double check them when you reassemble the engine... in this case, run the rocker bolt down by hand until you feel the pushrod get snug (= zero lash), then count the turns of the rocker arm bolt from there until the rocker trunnion seats firmly down into the stand. This may not work well with new or already-leaked-down lifters since the lifter cup will only have the internal spring pressure supporting the pushrod (i.e., may be difficult to find 'zero' without inadvertently pressing the lifter cup down into the lifter body).

You should probably check at least one intake and one exhaust since the two different types of valves may be a little different in length. Ideally you should check them all.
There is no "fudge factor". It just depends if youre going by theoretical, actual or gauge length of the pushrod. Gauge length is pretty standard to use when you order custom length pushrods.

http://www.compcams.com/Technical/In...20Geometry.pdf

OP:
Since you have an abundance of lifters and an old head gasket, you're in luck!!

Take an old LS7 lifter, remove the retainer clip and fill it with epoxy or gorilla glue (whatever), put it back together and set it on its side and let it dry. Its now a "solid" lifter. Install it in the block, put down your old head gaskets and torque down the head.

Now when you check for the length, you don't have to worry about plunger depression. Simply turn it till you find one that fits your needs and add an addition .050" or .060" or whatever length you want for preload.


If you are going to use another lifter besides an LS7/Caddie Racing lifter, then this won't exactly work unless you can veryify the difference in cup height between the two lifters unless they are the same.
If you dont have tools to measure, you might be able to call the manufacturer and they should tell you the cup height. Its just simple math from there to determine the difference.

Also, are you using a light rate valve spring when you're doing all this? I highly reccomend it.

Keep us posted

Last edited by briancb1; Jun 8, 2014 at 04:38 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 04:47 PM
  #47  
COSPEED's Avatar
COSPEED
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 119
St. Jude Donor '10
Default

I never ADD preload to a pushrod length. That is the same as guesstimating. You should ALWAYS measure that.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 04:49 PM
  #48  
COSPEED's Avatar
COSPEED
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 119
St. Jude Donor '10
Default

If math could get you there then all you need to measure is the base circle difference. And if you mill the heads or use a thinner head gasket or deck the block etc etc. Not all that math adds up in the real world. I know as I have tried it.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 06:46 PM
  #49  
Mark2009's Avatar
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 5
From: KY
Default

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
I never ADD preload to a pushrod length. That is the same as guesstimating. You should ALWAYS measure that.
Okay, how?
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 06:53 PM
  #50  
Mark2009's Avatar
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 5
From: KY
Default

Originally Posted by briancb1
There is no "fudge factor". It just depends if youre going by theoretical, actual or gauge length of the pushrod. Gauge length is pretty standard to use when you order custom length pushrods. [...]
You can't measure gauge length (well, the average person can't).

1. You can measure actual length,
2. use a similar known pushrod to come up wth the difference between actual length and gauge length, and use that to
3. come up with a fudge factor to specify the desired gauge length of what you measured in #1.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 07:04 PM
  #51  
COSPEED's Avatar
COSPEED
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 119
St. Jude Donor '10
Default

using an adjustable pushrod.

the 7702-1 comp pushrod is easiest. It has markings for every .050". It ranges from 6.800-7.800. For the LS7 you need the longer checker of course.
Then use it in increments. Normally you will screw it out to a known good or normal length like 7.400. Then find zero lash. From there on a metric 8 x 1.25 thread one turn is .047". I usually recommend .060 preload which would calculate out to 1 1/8 turns. Some people prefer more, which will get you into the 1 1/4 turn respectively. Screw the checker out or in until you get in that window or whichever measurement you choose.

The alternate way is to have multiple pushrods of multiple lengths and put them in and check them.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 07:41 PM
  #52  
Mark2009's Avatar
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 5
From: KY
Default

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
[....] From there on a metric 8 x 1.25 thread one turn is .047". I usually recommend .060 preload which would calculate out to 1 1/8 turns. [...]
No, that won't fly. You can't use rocker bolt threads to directly measure distance when there are angles (pivot points) involved (problem #1).

If you want to use a calibrated adjustable pushrod, and know how to use it, to find zero lash then fine (some seem to have trouble, and then some claim that not all adjustable pushrods work the same). Then just add your desired preload to that figure and I suppose you have gauge length.

But when you start playing with counting rocker arm bolt threads you are heading down the rabbit hole. At best you could set up a dial indicator on both the pushrod end of the rocker arm and the valve stem end of the rocker arm, simultaneously, and perhaps figure out what is going on (odds are that if the lifter is still full of oil then as you tighten the rocker arm you will also be pushing down on the valve stem -- problem #2).
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 07:57 PM
  #53  
orange rush's Avatar
orange rush
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth Tx
Default

Lifters installed and running again.

I ended up with Morels installed with 7.425 pushrods. The valve train noise is well within exceptable limits. I did end up counting threads as I tightened down the rockers. But I had the cam on the base circle each time. With 7.40 I would get over two turns before reaching 22lbs torque. With slightly longer I got 3/4 turn before reaching the torque valve. I tell ya, each time I see a method for determining pushrod lenght, there is a contrary reponse. Im not saying somebody is wrong, but it seems there should be a proper method we could follow without problems.

Also, i am back to 5w30 oil, maintained oil pressure, and no ticking. Glad to have this behind me, hopefully, I only took a short drive with it.

There has been a lot of help here on the board, and within this thread. Thanks all that helped. Also Colorado Speed and Texas Speed both, help me tons. Dont hesitate to work with either company.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 08:26 PM
  #54  
COSPEED's Avatar
COSPEED
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 119
St. Jude Donor '10
Default

The pythagorean theorem begs to differ.
No one is couting rocker arm bolt threads as they are EXACT MEASUREMENTS. You count the turns on the pushrod. That makes me think you have never done this method. The machined threads in the head are the only NON VARIABLE.
There is no perhaps in my method. There is no fudge factor.
I have literally done this hundreds of times, have recommended it more, and this method is widely accepted and used by many professionals including the person/shop who first introduced this method to tech, Thunder Racing. They are not a business anymore, but their business practices have nothing to do with their attention to detail with an engine and their methodology for installs.
There is no rabbit hole here only the one you appear to be chasing.

Trying to use a dial indicator that accurately for that length can be an issue as well. How good can you measure an angled surface with one? You cant.

Last edited by COSPEED; Jun 8, 2014 at 08:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 10:49 PM
  #55  
Mark2009's Avatar
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 5
From: KY
Default

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
The pythagorean theorem begs to differ.
If you can explain how it would apply in this situation then I would be impressed (surprised, also, since I can't see how it does).

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
No one is couting rocker arm bolt threads as they are EXACT MEASUREMENTS.
Yes, you were counting turns of the rocker arm bolt. That is the same as counting threads. It won't work, as I'll show in a bit.

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
You count the turns on the pushrod.
Yes, to obtain a zero lash measurement. Then, from your earlier post, it seem that you then started counting rocker bolt turns (or threads) to calculate preload.

And if you know the zero lash pushrod gauge length then there is no need to be counting anything anyway, you just add the desired preload to that length.

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
That makes me think you have never done this method. The machined threads in the head are the only NON VARIABLE.
No, there is another variable (thinking about the method rather than the experience of others would be more productive):
Now, if you assume the picture depicts the rocker sitting at zero lash, then you tighten down the rocker bolt until the rocker has become snug against the pedestal, has the pushrod (preload) moved:
a) less than the rocker bolt
b) the same as the rocker bolt
c) more than the rocker bolt.

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
There is no perhaps in my method. There is no fudge factor.
I have literally done this hundreds of times, have recommended it more, and this method is widely accepted and used by many professionals including the person/shop who first introduced this method to tech, Thunder Racing. They are not a business anymore, but their business practices have nothing to do with their attention to detail with an engine and their methodology for installs.
There is no rabbit hole here only the one you appear to be chasing.
I'm sorry that you've been doing it wrong all these years; now, with that diagram, you should be able to see the light . . . were one determined to count bolt turns and calculate bolt travel (pitch) to determine preload, then you'd want to multiply that result by 2.7 then divide by 1.7 (using the LS3 rocker ratio for example) to come up with an approximately correct number (this adjusts for the angular multiplication). Assuming the spring did not depress on you while you were tightening the bolt, which I don't think would be a particularly safe assumption (again, a dial indicator in that area would tell the tale).

In a nutshell, after you do all that math one turn of the bolt works out to be about .075 preload when you correct for the angles involved.

And you should not count the last ~1/8-1/4 turn if you are torquing to spec as the rocker trunnion has already seated in the pedestal and is not moving any further (that last bit of a turn is simply torque loading the assembly).

That should be a pretty exhaustive explanation. Apologies for the thread jack
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2014 | 10:59 PM
  #56  
COSPEED's Avatar
COSPEED
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 119
St. Jude Donor '10
Default

Maybe if you have the fulcrum of the rocker at the right height you would see more? I can draw inaccurate diagrams also. Maybe you forget about angularity between the rocker pushrod cup and the lifter pushrod cup? It isnt a straight line.
Go ahead and draw what I just said. Ill wait.
But you sure did draw most of Pythagoras' theorem. Too bad they are not on a straight line like that at all.

The spring should never depress when you are using the method i mentioned. If it does either you dont have the cam on the base circle, your lifter has completely collapsed, or your pushrod is entirely too long.

Last edited by COSPEED; Jun 8, 2014 at 11:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2014 | 06:42 PM
  #57  
Mark2009's Avatar
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 5
From: KY
Default

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
Maybe if you have the fulcrum of the rocker at the right height you would see more? I can draw inaccurate diagrams also.
Making the drawing more complicated will not change the angular multiplication (illustration is LS7):
Originally Posted by coSPEED2
Maybe you forget about angularity between the rocker pushrod cup and the lifter pushrod cup? It isnt a straight line. Go ahead and draw what I just said. Ill wait.
Actually it is a straight line, it is just not exactly perpendicular at all times during the lift cycle. Properly designed and assembled, it should be perpendicular to the centerline of the rocker arm pivot at half lift, unless some design compromises were made or perhaps aftermarket parts installed (perhaps incorrectly). So, assuming proper design and assembly, the slight deviation from perpendicular during the lift cycle simply means that preload will vary slightly during the lift cycle. I'm sure that with some effort this deviation could be measured while the valve is closed and a correction factor could be derived to apply to the previously calculated preload in that state (which would promptly change as the valve began to open during operation). This would, of course, mean that simply counting bolt turns would be slightly inaccurate.

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
[...] The spring should never depress when you are using the method i mentioned. [...]
Maybe. maybe not. It's going to depend on how 'pumped up' the lifter is and how easily it can relieve itself of that fluid. Since I would consider it possible I would consider it an item that should be monitored when using your approach, at least until no movement had been detected over the course of many such procedures.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Failed Lifter

Old Jun 9, 2014 | 07:09 PM
  #58  
COSPEED's Avatar
COSPEED
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 119
St. Jude Donor '10
Default

A fudge factor that you speak of would be how much more inaccurate?

I have had fresh lifters right off of running the engine and they have never....never...even hinted at moving the valve.

How many times have you actually done this?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 09:40 AM
  #59  
briancb1's Avatar
briancb1
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 932
Likes: 4
Default

Theres multiple ways you can go about measuring for pushrod length.

Its your engine, do whatever you want. But...

Making a solid lifter out of an old lifter that is dimesionally the same, a used head gasket of the same type you will use upon final assumbly and the Comp Cam .050" turn-style adjustable pushrod will give you a pretty darn accurate gauge length with ZERO preload. If you physically measure the adjustable pushrod, it will be longer length than the instructed "counting the turns" length from fully closed.

Mathmatically adding the desired preload to the "solid lifter setup" works and well at that. There is zero movement, no guessing if the piston is depressed. I'm not going to act like I created the process but I use it because it works very well and is repeatable.

I'll let you and Mark hash it out for 1st and 2nd place, but this way works every time.

Last edited by briancb1; Jun 10, 2014 at 09:43 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2014 | 09:48 AM
  #60  
nbm6spd's Avatar
nbm6spd
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default Lifter Preload

Mark2009, most of what you are saying is correct. When using the trunnion bolt method one turn of the bolt is not .047 preload. During loading of the lifter the rocker arm is pivoting on the valve stem and the trunnion bolt is not at the end of the arc radius, the pushrod however is. The ratio of the rocker at the beginning of the valve's travel is not 1.7:1, the ratio increases as lift increases. You can verify this by looking at the wear pattern on your rockers.

According to my calcs, and they are not exact, multiplier should be about 1.58. So if you get to zero lash, then turn the trunnion bolt one full turn to 22 ft lb, the amount of preload would be .074. .047x1.58=.074. And I only used .047 because I have seen it in so many threads, actually one turn of a 1.25 pitch metric thread is closer to .049".

I shoot for between 1 and 1 1/4 turns to get you reasonably close to the suggested preload of most lifters @ .082"

And yes you can check preload with a dial indicator on a good heavy base. I have done it many times and it is very accurate.

Last edited by nbm6spd; Jun 10, 2014 at 10:22 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE