C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fuel Pumps at Bottom of Tanks on 2006 and 2007?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2024, 12:52 PM
  #1  
ClothSeats
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
ClothSeats's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2019
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,868
Received 797 Likes on 515 Posts
Default Fuel Pumps at Bottom of Tanks on 2006 and 2007?

This recent video from C&S Corvettes claims that the positioning of the fuel pumps on 2006 and most 2007 Corvettes is different from 2008 and newer. Specifically, Lyle states that the early pumps mount at the bottom of the tank, while the newer pumps mount at the top of the tanks. Furthermore, he states that the early pumps have a metal top plate, while the newer pumps have a plastic top plate. Is it true that the mounting positions and top plate material is different between early and late? And if that is true, does that mean 2006 and most 2007 don't commonly have the fuel smell problem? Note: Although 2005 isn't mentioned in the video, I would assume it is included with 2006 and 2007.

Last edited by ClothSeats; 01-17-2024 at 01:03 PM.
Old 01-17-2024, 01:34 PM
  #2  
torquetube
Le Mans Master
 
torquetube's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: West coast CA
Posts: 5,171
Received 659 Likes on 477 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ClothSeats
This recent video from C&S Corvettes claims that the positioning of the fuel pumps on 2006 and most 2007 Corvettes is different from 2008 and newer. Specifically, Lyle states that the early pumps mount at the bottom of the tank, while the newer pumps mount at the top of the tanks. Furthermore, he states that the early pumps have a metal top plate, while the newer pumps have a plastic top plate. Is it true that the mounting positions and top plate material is different between early and late? And if that is true, does that mean 2006 and most 2007 don't commonly have the fuel smell problem? Note: Although 2005 isn't mentioned in the video, I would assume it is included with 2006 and 2007.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEQwziWCigQ&t=1s
The chronology presented in the video is completely screwed up.

All C6s have plastic top-mount pumps. The fuel system design switched from bottom-mount pumps to top-mount pumps late in the C5 run.

He must be confusing the pump position change and the level sender resistance change. The level sender resistance range was changed in 2007.
The following users liked this post:
ClothSeats (01-17-2024)
Old 01-18-2024, 09:15 AM
  #3  
ClothSeats
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
ClothSeats's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2019
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,868
Received 797 Likes on 515 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by torquetube
The chronology presented in the video is completely screwed up.

All C6s have plastic top-mount pumps. The fuel system design switched from bottom-mount pumps to top-mount pumps late in the C5 run.

He must be confusing the pump position change and the level sender resistance change. The level sender resistance range was changed in 2007.
Thanks for clearing this up. I hate it when Lyle puts out misleading information like this.
Old 01-18-2024, 03:28 PM
  #4  
double06
Melting Slicks
 
double06's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Potomac MD
Posts: 3,341
Received 377 Likes on 302 Posts

Default

In 2007 or so the fuel level sensor resistance did a reversal. The old way was 0 empty 240 ohms full in 2007 it went to 240 empty to zero ohms full. The logic there was as the pump aged the ohms resistance got worse. So a zero normally might be say a 30 ohm after 100K miles so you thought you had gas in the tank and you did not. When ordering a new pump for the older car you need to be aware of what gauge you have or swap you level gauge in tank out to new pump.
Old 01-18-2024, 10:28 PM
  #5  
Lights ZR1
Burning Brakes
 
Lights ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ClothSeats
Thanks for clearing this up. I hate it when Lyle puts out misleading information like this.
I expect nothing less ever since he allowed GM “engineers” on his channel to spew damage control BS about the LS7.
The following users liked this post:
Spaceme1117 (01-19-2024)
Old 01-19-2024, 02:31 AM
  #6  
torquetube
Le Mans Master
 
torquetube's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: West coast CA
Posts: 5,171
Received 659 Likes on 477 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by double06
The old way was 0 empty 240 ohms full in 2007 it went to 240 empty to zero ohms full.
Minimum resistance is 40Ω, not 0Ω, which allows the ECU to detect shorts to ground. (Maximum is more like 250Ω, but that's neither here nor there.)
The following users liked this post:
double06 (01-19-2024)
Old 01-19-2024, 09:13 AM
  #7  
ClothSeats
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
ClothSeats's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2019
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,868
Received 797 Likes on 515 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CorvetteFan1953
I expect nothing less ever since he allowed GM “engineers” on his channel to spew damage control BS about the LS7.
Yeah, that LS7 BS he put out really turned me off. Sometimes he should just keep his mouth shut.
The following users liked this post:
C6VetteLover (01-31-2024)

Get notified of new replies

To Fuel Pumps at Bottom of Tanks on 2006 and 2007?




Quick Reply: Fuel Pumps at Bottom of Tanks on 2006 and 2007?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM.