When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Which begs the question for those of us less knowledgeable in this area: If GM knows the exhaust manifold holds back the engine, then why don't they put headers on the car from the factory? Is it an emissions thing, certification thing what??
Jay
They moved the cats closer to the cylinder heads so they can come up to temperature quicker. They also made the manifolds out of cast iron instead of tubular steel, to retain heat. All of this is for better emissions.
Dave Hill said that a change in the exhaust sytem on the LS2 as installed in the C6 will not show any improvement in power. It will be interesting to see what you come up with. Sure wouldn't hurt to enhance the sound though!
The real challange will be headers with those cats right at the exhaust manifold.
We plan on changing both the cat back and headers in stages.
I agree it will be worth it for the sound. I believe there has to be some HP gain. Even on ZO6 TT systems, there is some power to be had.
Last edited by Dave_Busch; Sep 3, 2004 at 09:33 AM.
Which begs the question for those of us less knowledgeable in this area: If GM knows the exhaust manifold holds back the engine, then why don't they put headers on the car from the factory? Is it an emissions thing, certification thing what??
Jay
Primarily headers are RPM dependent. Good for a racecar in that the transmission can keep you in the band of RPM’s that they are designed. That’s why for example the shorties are no good do to the low rpms we use and the LT’s which fall into the 4 to 6K range. OEM’s have criteria to meet and emissions and drivability are two of them Tires for example have to meet nearly 40 requirements to qualify and after market guys don’t have to worry about that.
You can't compare two different cars on two different dynos. Some cars are stronger than others and Cartek got one.
It looks like the C6 has dyno numbers from 340rwhp-360rwhp which is just the same as the ZO6.
Did I say that? From their thread I just wanted them to answer a couple of questions about their base number and they still haven't answerd. If you gen low base numbers of course the rest is glory.
Now I've seen the other post and it was without cats. So if you average what evryone is getting on the Dyno's at about 350 RWHP what Lou got 22-23hp without cats is pretty realistic for those headers.
Where is LGM's results posted? I haven't seen it. I assume that was the LT's with no cats or any cat back exhaust to get 30hp.
Are there any exhaust port differences from the LS6 to the LS2 or can you use the existing LSx Headers as a direst bolt on?
It was strange how they pulled the dyno graph off their site, but the numbers were what they said they were.
LG said the headers bolt right up to the heads, since the heads the LS2 uses are LS6 heads anyway, but the exhaust pipes near the muffler use slip-fit clamps instead of flanges because of the new cat-back system of the C6.
Now I've seen the other post and it was without cats. So if you average what evryone is getting on the Dyno's at about 350 RWHP what Lou got 22-23hp without cats is pretty realistic for those headers.
Now I've seen the other post and it was without cats. So if you average what evryone is getting on the Dyno's at about 350 RWHP what Lou got 22-23hp without cats is pretty realistic for those headers.
That what a ZO6 would get with LT headers, about a 20-30rwhp gain.
The cats on the C6 are right up on the exhaust manifold so that they light off quickly for cold start emissions.
You've got to be careful about long tubes unless a way can be found to put the cats ahead of the collectors. Even then it may not work well for the emissions numbers.
In Calif. the State is targeting the Vette. My registration renewal required the smog dyno test at a TEST ONLY facility. That is done for suspected high emitters. That test facility wanted to reject my car due to the Granetelli Motor Sport MAF sensor!! I had to go into the BAR web page that night and print out the file that showed this sensor was CARB approved. They did pass the car the next day. What a hassle.
My '98 C5 barely came in under the HC specs with STOCK manifolds, a MagnaFlow X-pipe, and B&B TriFlow cat back Rt 66 quad tip exhaust systems.
Even with the first smog test due at five years old, if you sell the car, you've got to smog it right then. That could mean you'll need to keep the OEM exhaust stuff.
BTW with the above and a K&N FIPK cold air setup, my '98 gives 296.3 RWHP at 73 degrees and 30% humidity on a DynoJet.
The cats on the C6 are right up on the exhaust manifold so that they light off quickly for cold start emissions.
You've got to be careful about long tubes unless a way can be found to put the cats ahead of the collectors. Even then it may not work well for the emissions numbers.
In Calif. the State is targeting the Vette. My registration renewal required the smog dyno test at a TEST ONLY facility. That is done for suspected high emitters. That test facility wanted to reject my car due to the Granetelli Motor Sport MAF sensor!! I had to go into the BAR web page that night and print out the file that showed this sensor was CARB approved. They did pass the car the next day. What a hassle.
My '98 C5 barely came in under the HC specs with STOCK manifolds, a MagnaFlow X-pipe, and B&B TriFlow cat back Rt 66 quad tip exhaust systems.
Even with the first smog test due at five years old, if you sell the car, you've got to smog it right then. That could mean you'll need to keep the OEM exhaust stuff.
BTW with the above and a K&N FIPK cold air setup, my '98 gives 296.3 RWHP at 73 degrees and 30% humidity on a DynoJet.
how do so many anti car people get elected to office in a state with all the car nuts,you guys must not vote.