When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
No argument there, LT5 TB designed for LT5 engine and everything else. That's how you do it.Shaving and shaping are trying to squeeze the last drop of the LT1/LT4 TB for LT1/LT4 cars, not for the ZR1. The TB is king at part throttle (meaning influential), it is a Mr. nobody at WOT. At WOT it is just a 4-inch long duct extension, there isn't much more to it. You can increase that little length of duct to have a 1-mile diameter and, yes, it will flow very slow, very little pressure drop in it, yet the influence is nearly null in the system.
That is true until the demand is increased over stock.. Eventually you will pay a penalty for trying to get 95mm worth of work through 87mm, even if it is optimized with unicorn tears and a flux capacitor. I’m not bashing your product. I’m sure it is as good as 87mm can get. I bet the drivability and part throttle increase are better than stock, for vehicles near stock. I think the point being made by a few people was that there are gains to be had with a larger TB, if you have removed just some of the stock road blocks, while using a PD supercharger.
Last edited by Silvah Goat; Jun 21, 2019 at 08:12 AM.
100% of the part throttle "benefits" or "changes" can be realized through calibration of the driver request surface and ZERO hardware changes on a GENV engine. Current surprise level zero with regard to seeing similar WOT performance when the combination was not restricted by the throttle at full opening.
Originally Posted by Earl H
If adding a TB doesn't produce a gain, then its not the restriction at whatever power level you are at for the power adder that you are using....+/- 10hp is probably within the margin of error/variance and one would have to question if its even worth talking about. None of what has been posted proves that a 95 or 102 is worth it, cuz it hasn't really been used on a combo that needs it.
For me, it took a 7+L stroker with a 2.9L Whipple to see an engineering need for a change from the LT1 to Katech103 (only part on hand at the client) at full load. We were able to see a useful change in SCIP, MAP, and MAF after changing throttles on that combo, but we're talking four-digit power levels on a big PD combo there.
If one is talking about a stock-ish engine with a PD supercharger, the stock throttle may not be a restiction and you can get whatever part throttle response you want by asking for it correctly in the calibration tables. If you are blowing through the throttle (centrifugal or turbo), the bar moves even higher with regard to how much a stock TB is good for.