Talked to someone from GM...
#41
Melting Slicks
I can get a 662 hp mustang for 55k. So asking for a 500hp vette doesnt seem like too much to ask. Just 6 more months for healthy helpings of crow to be served en masse on this forum.
#42
Melting Slicks
There wont be a z06. Only a top and base engine model. Gm learned its lesson now. Z06 sales are almost non existant since the zr1.
#43
I was talking to the owner of a Chevy dealer that I know and he said, he has been selling GM cars for over 20 years and has close contacts with GM and he said, GM is not letting any info out on C7. He said he knew a lot of info on Camaro way before anyone else but on C7, nothing.
#44
Safety Car
I can't believe how many guys here believe the base C7 is supposed to compete with the big-engined Mustang. That's Camaro's challenge. The C7 is a 2 passenger sports car that is intended to excel in many areas. I'm expecting that even with 450 hp or less the C7 will turn better lap times than that big Mustang with 200 more horsepower. And expect highway MPG way into the 30's. Wait and see...
...but if the drag strip is your thing, go buy that Mustang now!
...but if the drag strip is your thing, go buy that Mustang now!
#45
Team Owner
There is just one thing I have to say about this thread...
"LOOK AROUND PEOPLE"
Did you see Ford reduce the size of the mustang motor and marginalize the hp output? NO (the GT went from a 4.6 to 5.0 motor adding nearly 100 hp and the cobra went from 5.4 to 5.8 adding 112 hp!!)
Did you see Dodge reduce the size of the motor in the Viper and marginalize the HP? NO (they kept the GIGANTIC 8.4 and added 40 more hp to an already 600!)
So based on the above do you think GM's response to all of this is going to be shrink the motor and raise the hp by 14??? Not going to happen.
I'm not calling any of the people that have heard from their GM sources liars but consider this: Do you think what they gave you was an accurate fact about the HP ratings of the new cars or do you think it's more logical that what they gave you was what they WANTED you to think was the actual HP rating?
I will make this guarantee to you all and I'm not an insider nor do I work for GM...but I PROMISE all of you the C7 base will have over 500 hp and the Z will have over 600. FACT
"LOOK AROUND PEOPLE"
Did you see Ford reduce the size of the mustang motor and marginalize the hp output? NO (the GT went from a 4.6 to 5.0 motor adding nearly 100 hp and the cobra went from 5.4 to 5.8 adding 112 hp!!)
Did you see Dodge reduce the size of the motor in the Viper and marginalize the HP? NO (they kept the GIGANTIC 8.4 and added 40 more hp to an already 600!)
So based on the above do you think GM's response to all of this is going to be shrink the motor and raise the hp by 14??? Not going to happen.
I'm not calling any of the people that have heard from their GM sources liars but consider this: Do you think what they gave you was an accurate fact about the HP ratings of the new cars or do you think it's more logical that what they gave you was what they WANTED you to think was the actual HP rating?
I will make this guarantee to you all and I'm not an insider nor do I work for GM...but I PROMISE all of you the C7 base will have over 500 hp and the Z will have over 600. FACT
I'd be shocked if the base car had 500+hp (or even 500 on the nose).
But if you're guaranteeing and promising it then I'll take it!
460-475 is still a safer bet in my opinion.
Base car (coupe and convertible).
Upmarket base car (Grand Sport?).
ZR1.
#46
Melting Slicks
I can't believe how many guys here believe the base C7 is supposed to compete with the big-engined Mustang. That's Camaro's challenge. The C7 is a 2 passenger sports car that is intended to excel in many areas. I'm expecting that even with 450 hp or less the C7 will turn better lap times than that big Mustang with 200 more horsepower. And expect highway MPG way into the 30's. Wait and see...
...but if the drag strip is your thing, go buy that Mustang now!
...but if the drag strip is your thing, go buy that Mustang now!
#47
Le Mans Master
Just 6 more months for healthy helpings of crow to be served en masse on this forum.
#48
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
C5 had only 20 more HP (if that) than LT4 which it replaced but was a much better car and sold well.
Let's look at the total package before being disappointed. The Z is really a no-compromises hard-edged car. It is not for everybody.
If the C7 comes in at 450HP and 3100 lbs, with great looks, excellent fuel efficiency, top-drawer interior and improved targa function, it will meet most Vette buyers' needs very well.
Let's look at the total package before being disappointed. The Z is really a no-compromises hard-edged car. It is not for everybody.
If the C7 comes in at 450HP and 3100 lbs, with great looks, excellent fuel efficiency, top-drawer interior and improved targa function, it will meet most Vette buyers' needs very well.
#49
If you've ever seen the video of the C6R/ZR1 drag race where the C6R won pretty handily, the beginning of the race started out badly for the C6R...to be expected when you have a peaky engine with a close ratio transmission with a very high 1st gear. Once the C6R came up on its HP curve, the shifts came fast and furious allowing it to deliver close to peak HP for its average HP. The ZR1 starts off well due to better gearing and much higher low RPM HP but it falls 100 HP off its peak HP on each shift. Even though the ZR1 has over 140 HP more at peak, you can't give up that much HP on each shift to a much lighter car and expect to win.
Personally, I don't want to see a 5.5L engine in the Corvette unless it comes with a couple of turbos. Keep the boost modest and make an easy 500-525 HP and I would be fine with that. With turbos, torque could peak at around 1700-1800 RPM and stay there until 5000 RPM.
Anything less than 475-500 HP in the base Corvette regardless of engine type will be a failure as far as I'm concerned. And I hope to see the aluminum frame used across the board along with the magnesium engine cradle from the Z06/ZR1. A 3100 lb base Corvette with a 550 HP turbo 5.5L and a 7 speed DCT is my fantasy. That would finally be enough to get me out of my '93 ZR-1.
#50
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
I just don't get why the next base Vette has to have 62 HP more or else it's a failure. I can't think of any Corvette generation that ups the anti that much on its first year.
I think 450HP is quite good, even if it's only 12 HP. Especially if it's coming from a smaller more efficient engine. More importantly, the weight of the car AND how it's geared is going to make a huge difference. Remember, the rumors are a 7 speed manual and 8 speed auto. For all we know this car may not fall out of its HP range during shifts.
I think 450HP is quite good, even if it's only 12 HP. Especially if it's coming from a smaller more efficient engine. More importantly, the weight of the car AND how it's geared is going to make a huge difference. Remember, the rumors are a 7 speed manual and 8 speed auto. For all we know this car may not fall out of its HP range during shifts.
#51
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: BOOMER SOONER Big 12 Champions 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 - 2008, 2010, 2012, 2015 - 2020.....
Posts: 14,858
Received 914 Likes
on
527 Posts
I just don't get why the next base Vette has to have 62 HP more or else it's a failure. I can't think of any Corvette generation that ups the anti that much on its first year.
I think 450HP is quite good, even if it's only 12 HP. Especially if it's coming from a smaller more efficient engine. More importantly, the weight of the car AND how it's geared is going to make a huge difference. Remember, the rumors are a 7 speed manual and 8 speed auto. For all we know this car may not fall out of its HP range during shifts.
I think 450HP is quite good, even if it's only 12 HP. Especially if it's coming from a smaller more efficient engine. More importantly, the weight of the car AND how it's geared is going to make a huge difference. Remember, the rumors are a 7 speed manual and 8 speed auto. For all we know this car may not fall out of its HP range during shifts.
#52
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: BOOMER SOONER Big 12 Champions 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 - 2008, 2010, 2012, 2015 - 2020.....
Posts: 14,858
Received 914 Likes
on
527 Posts
I was talking to the owner of a Chevy dealer that I know and he said, he has been selling GM cars for over 20 years and has close contacts with GM and he said, GM is not letting any info out on C7. He said he knew a lot of info on Camaro way before anyone else but on C7, nothing.
#53
Melting Slicks
I just don't get why the next base Vette has to have 62 HP more or else it's a failure. I can't think of any Corvette generation that ups the anti that much on its first year.
I think 450HP is quite good, even if it's only 12 HP. Especially if it's coming from a smaller more efficient engine. More importantly, the weight of the car AND how it's geared is going to make a huge difference. Remember, the rumors are a 7 speed manual and 8 speed auto. For all we know this car may not fall out of its HP range during shifts.
I think 450HP is quite good, even if it's only 12 HP. Especially if it's coming from a smaller more efficient engine. More importantly, the weight of the car AND how it's geared is going to make a huge difference. Remember, the rumors are a 7 speed manual and 8 speed auto. For all we know this car may not fall out of its HP range during shifts.
#54
Le Mans Master
You keep bringing up this mustand (sic) as if it's Corvette-killing competition and yet you won't buy one. Tell us now, if C7 debuts with less than 500hp, will you go out and buy a GT500? Because if you its biggest fan won't buy one, it's not the threat to Corvette you say it is.
#56
Burning Brakes
Don't buy it at all. Most insiders consider it to be a pretty well known thing that it will have a 6.2 DI, not a 5.5, and it will have more than 450hp
#57
VETERAN
GM Leadership is "TightLip" on all details of the C7
Good Looks and Performance is a MUST for the C7. Sure the interior needs improvement and the Nav needs to come into the 21st century.
I am confident that will be done, but at an overall weight penalty. However, the manly men of America are not going to buy the C7 if it doesn't kick ***.
I called a weekly "pilot meeting" yesterday for my fighter pilots in my group to purposely discuss the requirements of the C7, of course we were armed with quality beer for this meeting. I explained to everyone how I read this C7 forum about 4 days per week. I also mentioned how if forum members don't like what you say that you get your *** handed to you in the replys just like in a fighter squadron. Out of 27 pilots, 12 in attendance own C5 or C6 Vettes. 9 owned Porshces. 2 had both vehicles. Overall consensus: the C7 better look great, weigh no more than 3200 Lbs. and have a minimum of 480 Hp or no deal. Everyone said that they would not purchase a new C7 if it has a measley 450 Hp, as the rumors go.
With Direct Injection the increase in Hp norm is approximately 15%, therefore the base C6 with 430 should hopefully increase by 65 Horses moving close to 500 Hp. WE all agreed that the car will not get much lighter due to all the crying over interior and bells/whistles required. At best a 50-100 pound reduction. If the C7 weighs in at 3100 lbs. and has 500 Hp most in the room stated that they would want the second year version of the C7. Hopefully, this type of information flows back to the GM Leadship. Lastly, I was stunned that the young guns in our meeting wanted DCT in the C7 and would give up the 6 or 7 speed standard shift. Some things can't be taught to the younger generation. Only experience will bring them back to the surface.
Cheers,
Fuze
I am confident that will be done, but at an overall weight penalty. However, the manly men of America are not going to buy the C7 if it doesn't kick ***.
I called a weekly "pilot meeting" yesterday for my fighter pilots in my group to purposely discuss the requirements of the C7, of course we were armed with quality beer for this meeting. I explained to everyone how I read this C7 forum about 4 days per week. I also mentioned how if forum members don't like what you say that you get your *** handed to you in the replys just like in a fighter squadron. Out of 27 pilots, 12 in attendance own C5 or C6 Vettes. 9 owned Porshces. 2 had both vehicles. Overall consensus: the C7 better look great, weigh no more than 3200 Lbs. and have a minimum of 480 Hp or no deal. Everyone said that they would not purchase a new C7 if it has a measley 450 Hp, as the rumors go.
With Direct Injection the increase in Hp norm is approximately 15%, therefore the base C6 with 430 should hopefully increase by 65 Horses moving close to 500 Hp. WE all agreed that the car will not get much lighter due to all the crying over interior and bells/whistles required. At best a 50-100 pound reduction. If the C7 weighs in at 3100 lbs. and has 500 Hp most in the room stated that they would want the second year version of the C7. Hopefully, this type of information flows back to the GM Leadship. Lastly, I was stunned that the young guns in our meeting wanted DCT in the C7 and would give up the 6 or 7 speed standard shift. Some things can't be taught to the younger generation. Only experience will bring them back to the surface.
Cheers,
Fuze
#58
So now we need to know how many Corvette owners in the U.S.A. are fighter pilots and we will know how much all their opinion matters.
As to the younger members and DCT, isn't it true that the younger pilots are far less hands-on with the newer planes than the older pilots were with the older planes? Same is going to be true of the newer Corvettes. Newer technology tends to take more and more human error out of the equation.
As to the younger members and DCT, isn't it true that the younger pilots are far less hands-on with the newer planes than the older pilots were with the older planes? Same is going to be true of the newer Corvettes. Newer technology tends to take more and more human error out of the equation.
Last edited by BlueOx; 06-23-2012 at 01:53 PM.
#59
The real question to ask your pilot buddies is "if the C6 was taking design cues from the F-22, what military hardware should the C7 take it's design cues from?"
How about the UXV Combatant Warship?
How about the UXV Combatant Warship?
#60
Le Mans Master
A lot of guys say "if it doesn't have at least X horsepower I won't buy it." The thing is, these comments don't often survive outside the vacuum of future-car discussion.
When the day comes and (for example) the 500hp base C7 doesn't exist, and your choices are a 450hp C7 or a 330hp Cayman S or a fortified Mustang, or hanging onto and living with an older/tweaked car for several more years... that C7 may not be the car you wished for, but it's likely still the closest thing to your ideal and the one you'll end up buying. If it's not, you probably weren't serious about Corvette in the first place.
Because it's not like some other manufacturer is going to see that C7 is only 450hp instead of 500 and jump in and make a better Corvette.
.Jinx
When the day comes and (for example) the 500hp base C7 doesn't exist, and your choices are a 450hp C7 or a 330hp Cayman S or a fortified Mustang, or hanging onto and living with an older/tweaked car for several more years... that C7 may not be the car you wished for, but it's likely still the closest thing to your ideal and the one you'll end up buying. If it's not, you probably weren't serious about Corvette in the first place.
Because it's not like some other manufacturer is going to see that C7 is only 450hp instead of 500 and jump in and make a better Corvette.
.Jinx