Corvette c7 stingray: Driven
Not my buddy, and you don't need to qualify your sentence with "maybe he knows how to drive." He definitely knows how to drive and would run circles around you like crazy. You don't get asked by the Porsche factory to compete in the N24, nor do you get to drive an F1 car, nor do you get to drive Ford's works WRC rally car, nor do you get to drive the Nissan Deltawing, nor do you get asked by an F40 and F50 owner to wring out both cars if you only "maybe" know how to drive. You say he's a "hack," but you won't likely find a more accomplished "hack" who's driven more cars than he has.
What he's good at is describing how a car feels, how it behaves, and he's apparently been very good at it to be able to afford his toys (multiple Ferraris, Porsches, BMW M car here and there). People pay him to give drive impressions, on both sides of the Atlantic (edmunds, Evo, Autocar). People ask him to drive their megabuck cars to the limit to give an impression of what he thinks. Just because he doesn't gush with nothing but effusive praise for a car doesn't make him a hack. I suspect nobody has ever asked you to test drive their Ferrari F50 and F40...
As to why the Brits like Porsches, maybe it's because Porsche makes a high quality car that fits their needs, that fits their driving style and roads (think about outward vision and % rainy days), and taxation schemes. Crazy of Porsche to deliver a car that people actually want to own and drive, huh? Jaguar, Aston Martin, Lotus, and Nissan also build RHD sports cars and, with the exception perhaps of the GT-R, none of them have bowled over the Brits like the 911 has.
You may deride the driving needs of people who live in countries with "idiotic" layouts, but despite having only .8% of the world's population, the UK accounted for 10% of Porsche's sports car sales last year. In the UK, Japan, Hong Kong, and Australia/NZ alone, Porsche sold 6200 cars. That's already 16% of their sports car business. For reference, the Z06 and ZR1 combined accounted for 7% of Corvette production last year.
Last edited by Guibo; Nov 21, 2013 at 12:21 PM.
The Ford GT was (ok, more specifically Troy, MI) yet it was met with critical acclaim overseas.
Thirdly, the Nissan GT-R and GT86/BRZ have also been met with critical acclaim (Chris Harris rated it highly too), so your claims of "euro car lover bias" is without merit. Autocar, for instance, have done articles highlighting how the GT86 is just about as fun on track as the F12, and on real-world roads it is more fun for more of the time than their own home-grown MP4-12C. They rated the GT86 their Best Driver's Car, beating out the previous title holder, the Cayman R. Japan over Germany.
"Assault?" How did this writer "assault" your beloved supercar?
Not my buddy, and you don't need to qualify your sentence with "maybe he knows how to drive." He definitely knows how to drive and would run circles around you like crazy. You don't get asked by the Porsche factory to compete in the N24, nor do you get to drive an F1 car, nor do you get to drive Ford's works WRC rally car, nor do you get to drive the Nissan Deltawing, nor do you get asked by an F40 and F50 owner to wring out both cars if you only "maybe" know how to drive. You say he's a "hack," but you won't likely find a more accomplished "hack" who's driven more cars than he has.
What he's good at is describing how a car feels, how it behaves, and he's apparently been very good at it to be able to afford his toys (multiple Ferraris, Porsches, BMW M car here and there). People pay him to give drive impressions, on both sides of the Atlantic (edmunds, Evo, Autocar). People ask him to drive their megabuck cars to the limit to give an impression of what he thinks. Just because he doesn't gush with nothing but effusive praise for a car doesn't make him a hack. I suspect nobody has ever asked you to test drive their Ferrari F50 and F40...
with the above statements. I heard Chris discussing his C7 impressions a couple of weeks ago via The Smoking Tire (TST) audio podcast, and the short of it is GM would've come out better sending a Z51, MRC, 7-Speed. I agree that he is a little biased towards Porsche but I think that's okay because everyone should have a preference. I think the best news to come out of this is:
1. This is the Base Vette and its stacking up superbly.
2. For the most part, no one is writing it off as just another "cheap" but fast Chevy.
3. Better Press + More potential buyers + More money for GM = Better budgets for Hi-Po C7 versions
Last edited by truth.b; Nov 21, 2013 at 12:17 PM.
"Just a writer"...with probably more actual hands-on experience with more cars and racing experience than probably 99% of active members within this forum (and probably more than 99% of auto journalists as well).
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
All of this can only be good for GM. The increased exposure overseas has a cyclical effect. Corvettes on the ground are a rolling advertisement for what GM can do and if they are displacing foreign (to us) marques in people's garages, then that's something those manufacturers will need to consider once they start losing marketshare.Outstanding video at Goodwood BTW.
Last edited by Guibo; Nov 21, 2013 at 12:59 PM.
As to why the Brits like Porsches, maybe it's because Porsche makes a high quality car that fits their needs, that fits their driving style and roads (think about outward vision and % rainy days), and taxation schemes. Crazy of Porsche to deliver a car that people actually want to own and drive, huh? Jaguar, Aston Martin, Lotus, and Nissan also build RHD sports cars and, with the exception perhaps of the GT-R, none of them have bowled over the Brits like the 911 has.
You may deride the driving needs of people who live in countries with "idiotic" layouts, but despite having only .8% of the world's population, the UK accounted for 10% of Porsche's sports car sales last year. In the UK, Japan, Hong Kong, and Australia/NZ alone, Porsche sold 6200 cars. That's already 16% of their sports car business. For reference, the Z06 and ZR1 combined accounted for 7% of Corvette production last year.
http://forums.gearboxsoftware.com/sh...d.php?t=132161
You are delusional if you think that it's only Chris Harris who has noted the shortcomings of Corvettes in the UK/Euro market. I'll post here the very words of a ZR1 owner from that Corvette magazine:
"I’ve had Ferraris, Bentleys, TVRs, Mercedes, Audis and Porsches. I’ve also had a number of Corvettes, including a C5 convertible, a C6 and a Z06, and have loved them all.
You have to be very careful and give it [ZR1] a lot of respect, unlike my Audi R8 V10, which was rock steady. On motorways and smooth A-roads, the ZR1 is wonderful, but you can’t take liberties down a narrow, bumpy road. You have to concentrate 100 percent because the steering wheel is constantly moving around.
The ZR1 has a better ride than the Z06 but still jars badly on our poor road surfaces, and that’s on the softer Tour setting. The hard Sport setting is so ridiculously hard you can’t use it on our roads. You can in France, where the roads are like glass.
It only averages 14 mpg and less than 10 mpg when you boot it. With petrol at over £6 a gallon, that’s not funny. But the biggest criticism is the interior, which is dreadful. It’s cheap, with poor-quality plastics and the switch gear is like 1970s Datsun, but it does the job. The seats are not supportive enough and nowhere near as comfortable as the old C5’s, and the seat backs are really flimsy*. Having said all that, I still love it."
*This was published in December of 2012, long before C&D's autopsy comparison of C7 vs C6 seats, which showed that critics of the C6's seats weren't full of **** after all.
Oh wow, one random poster on the interweb weighs in on why he thinks Harris was let go (with no evidence that that was actually the case), and you're treating it as gospel? That has no bearing on the numerous COTY awards bestowed onto Porsche when Harris wasn't there, nor the same for Autocar when he wasn't there either. If there's any bias, it's for a type of car that is generally delivered by Porsche. And unlike other mags who do the talk but don't walk the walk, he's paid for the price of enjoying Ferraris and Porsches with his own money. If that's not a ringing endorsement to the underlying quality of a car and an example of putting your money where your mouth is, I don't know what is.
You are delusional if you think that it's only Chris Harris who has noted the shortcomings of Corvettes in the UK/Euro market. I'll post here the very words of a ZR1 owner from that Corvette magazine:
"I’ve had Ferraris, Bentleys, TVRs, Mercedes, Audis and Porsches. I’ve also had a number of Corvettes, including a C5 convertible, a C6 and a Z06, and have loved them all.
You have to be very careful and give it [ZR1] a lot of respect, unlike my Audi R8 V10, which was rock steady. On motorways and smooth A-roads, the ZR1 is wonderful, but you can’t take liberties down a narrow, bumpy road. You have to concentrate 100 percent because the steering wheel is constantly moving around.
The ZR1 has a better ride than the Z06 but still jars badly on our poor road surfaces, and that’s on the softer Tour setting. The hard Sport setting is so ridiculously hard you can’t use it on our roads. You can in France, where the roads are like glass.
It only averages 14 mpg and less than 10 mpg when you boot it. With petrol at over £6 a gallon, that’s not funny. But the biggest criticism is the interior, which is dreadful. It’s cheap, with poor-quality plastics and the switch gear is like 1970s Datsun, but it does the job. The seats are not supportive enough and nowhere near as comfortable as the old C5’s, and the seat backs are really flimsy*."
*This was published in December of 2012, long before C&D's autopsy comparison of C7 vs C6 seats, which showed that critics of the C6's seats weren't full of **** after all.
Oh wow, one random poster on the interweb weighs in on why he thinks Harris was let go (with no evidence that that was actually the case), and you're treating it as gospel? That has no bearing on the numerous COTY awards bestowed onto Porsche when Harris wasn't there, nor the same for Autocar when he wasn't there either. If there's any bias, it's for a type of car that is generally delivered by Porsche. And unlike other mags who do the talk but don't walk the walk, he's paid for the price of enjoying Ferraris and Porsches with his own money. If that's not a ringing endorsement to the underlying quality of a car and an example of putting your money where your mouth is, I don't know what is.
*That was a direct response to a post made here by none other than our very own skank:
Assuming it was indeed a base car that Harris was driving, it's not inconceivable that it could feel this way, when even the more sorted Z51 isn't completely buttoned down.













