When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My assumption is that the OP is using 91 or 93 octane, which is premium, he hasn't stated otherwise. That is what is in the manual. Of course at altitude premium octane levels can drop, like in Colorado. That assumption that he's using what is in the manual is correct until he says otherwise, his question did not specify anything about octane.
Non-ethanol based = E0 = Pure Gas = Sugar free.
You are wrong to assume high octane non-Ethanols fuels are widely available across the USA. They're not. The chances are good that he does not have access to this high octane fuel - that is my take. It is a logical assumption to make due to the nationwide scarcity of this product.
In my town we have 92 octane non-top tier pure-gas fuel available. However, the premium for no ethanol is pretty steep. It was almost a dollar per gallon more than 93 E10 at the same station. Looking around the state, most of the pure-gas available is in the 87-90 octane range. I use 93 E10 top tier so I get the octane point and the detergents. If I was storing the car and had the opportunity, I'd probably run a tank of pure-gas through it and store it with pure-gas just because it stores better, even if it did cost more.
In my town we have 92 octane non-top tier pure-gas fuel available. However, the premium for no ethanol is pretty steep. It was almost a dollar per gallon more than 93 E10 at the same station.
Since pure gas will give you about 10% better gas mileage the cost then only amounts to 70 cents more per gallon based on the fuel economy gain. That's not bad if you want to put your vehicle away for the winter. I would never leave ethanol sitting in my vehicle tank for more than 1 month. Seems to me that's a small price to pay for not cluttering up your fuel system with junk over the winter.
Unless you actually test it, you don't really know what percentage of ethanol is in the gas you are buying. 93 octane, or any pump gas for that matter, is up to 10% ethanol, doesn't mean it is actually 10% ethanol. The BP station I use has 93 octane, it tests out at E3-5 over the last year since I've had a flex-fuel sensor on the car. Ethanol doesn't hurt the car at all. You don't want to store the car for the winter with a tank full of E85 but E10/pump gas is no issue at all.
Unless you actually test it, you don't really know what percentage of ethanol is in the gas you are buying. 93 octane, or any pump gas for that matter, is up to 10% ethanol, doesn't mean it is actually 10% ethanol. The BP station I use has 93 octane, it tests out at E3-5 over the last year since I've had a flex-fuel sensor on the car. Ethanol doesn't hurt the car at all. You don't want to store the car for the winter with a tank full of E85 but E10/pump gas is no issue at all.
In either case, if you are storing your car, gas stabilizer is a good idea. Based on what I've read, the ethanol attracting/mixing with water is the real problem with that fuel. The fuel stabilizer may help alleviate that problem.
On a different note, if the 93 you've been buying at the BP station tests out at E3-5, one wonders if it is really 93 octane. My understanding is that the ethanol blending is one of the last steps in the creation of the fuel. If the base gasoline used in the fuel is structured to give 93 octane when blended with sufficient ethanol to create an E10 fuel, one wonders what the resulting octane rating is at E3. Am I missing something?
In either case, if you are storing your car, gas stabilizer is a good idea. Based on what I've read, the ethanol attracting/mixing with water is the real problem with that fuel. The fuel stabilizer may help alleviate that problem.
On a different note, if the 93 you've been buying at the BP station tests out at E3-5, one wonders if it is really 93 octane. My understanding is that the ethanol blending is one of the last steps in the creation of the fuel. If the base gasoline used in the fuel is structured to give 93 octane when blended with sufficient ethanol to create an E10 fuel, one wonders what the resulting octane rating is at E3. Am I missing something?
Ethanol is hygroscopic, making the blended fuel more prone to phase separation and providing an environment conducive to the growth of acetobacter, which can cause corrosion. Certain stabilizers mitigate these problems.
That's a great point - lower than expected ethanol levels likely mean lower than expected octane as well.
Last edited by NortonCO; Nov 12, 2020 at 12:18 PM.
In either case, if you are storing your car, gas stabilizer is a good idea. Based on what I've read, the ethanol attracting/mixing with water is the real problem with that fuel. The fuel stabilizer may help alleviate that problem.
On a different note, if the 93 you've been buying at the BP station tests out at E3-5, one wonders if it is really 93 octane. My understanding is that the ethanol blending is one of the last steps in the creation of the fuel. If the base gasoline used in the fuel is structured to give 93 octane when blended with sufficient ethanol to create an E10 fuel, one wonders what the resulting octane rating is at E3. Am I missing something?
Agreed on all accounts. Norton, I agree with you too. I run 60/40 93/E85 (actually E70 around here in the spring/summer) which normally blends out to E35ish according to the sensor. I don't store my car but I run only 93 in the winter to avoid issues starting it when it's cold out. It would be interesting to test the 93 and see what it comes out to, that's a very good point.
We have non-ethanol 93 in Raleigh. I used to use the Sunoco non-ethanol, but they dropped their Top Tier designation several months ago. Mobil has non-ethanol 93 TT and is close to $3. I used the Shell ethanol 93 in the past but car runs better on the Mobil.
We have non-ethanol 93 in Raleigh. I used to use the Sunoco non-ethanol, but they dropped their Top Tier designation several months ago. Mobil has non-ethanol 93 TT and is close to $3. I used the Shell ethanol 93 in the past but car runs better on the Mobil.
How does it run better? I have a Mobil and a Shell station just blocks apart and I'm always wondering if one is better than the other. I've been getting Shell 93 most of the fill ups. Probably only one on Mobil 93.
Looked at WOT data log and engine timing pull back meaning knock sensor was all over the place with Shell 93. Hardly any pull back with Mobil 93 non ethanol. Which means more potential HP.
Last edited by rwc815; Nov 12, 2020 at 02:25 PM.
Reason: Add
Ethanol contains less potential energy than gas so, all other things being equal, more of it is required to do the same amount of work, meaning lower MPG and/or lower performance. One of the reasons fuel system upgrades are required to run E85 is that it's almost 30% less powerful than "pure" gasoline. As long as you don't go below the recommended octane level for your application and you're not trying to cure heat problems, ethanol-free gas is better than ethanol blends.
Looked at WOT data log and engine timing pull back meaning knock sensor was all over the place with Shell 93. Hardly any pull back with Mobil 93 non ethanol. Which means more potential HP.