When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Now that the car is broken in we put it on the rollers today. It put down 412rwhp bone stock. After fabricating some dyno peripherals it looks like we're finally going on the engine dyno tomorrow with our spare LT1 test engine. I've been anxiously waiting for that.
This is the 2nd dyno I've seen with the stock C7 ~413hp.
I find it interesting this is the exact horsepower my C6 puts down with high lift rockers & Melrose headers, w/o a tune. I also hasten to point out that my 2009 with the Z51 weighs less than the C7 does . . . .
Of course, the C7 engine will soar to new HP with mods, as all the other LSX engines have done.
But in the meantime, I find it comforting that I won't be embarrased by any stock C7 I meet on the road.
Last edited by fnbrowning; Oct 16, 2013 at 03:51 PM.
This is the 2nd dyno I've seen with the stock C7 ~413hp.
I find it interesting this is the exact horsepower my C6 puts down with high lift rockers & Melrose headers, w/o a tune. I also hasten to point out that my 2009 with the Z51 weighs less than the C7 does . . . .
Of course, the C7 engine will soar to new HP with mods, as all the other LSX engines have done.
But in the meantime, I find it comforting that I won't be embarrased by any stock C7 I meet on the road.
I'm not saying the C7 will beat you as it's gonna be dependent on driver skills of both, but you can't just compare peak numbers especially from a different dyno...that's how you lose money in races
I'm looking forward to seeing what you guys come up with!
Originally Posted by JMB
Jason, thanks for being the 1st guy on the planet to post the A/F on a dyno run!!!
I've seen 12.0 to 12.2 AFR on the stock C7's we've had on the dyno which is interesting with the DI. They generally like to be a little leaner and I would have expected 12.8 to 13.0 myself.
This is the 2nd dyno I've seen with the stock C7 ~413hp.
I find it interesting this is the exact horsepower my C6 puts down with high lift rockers & Melrose headers, w/o a tune. I also hasten to point out that my 2009 with the Z51 weighs less than the C7 does . . . .
Of course, the C7 engine will soar to new HP with mods, as all the other LSX engines have done.
But in the meantime, I find it comforting that I won't be embarrased by any stock C7 I meet on the road.
That's fantastic and I'm sure you're very proud.
Did your almighty C6 put down those numbers on either of the dynos in question?
S.
This is the 2nd dyno I've seen with the stock C7 ~413hp.
I find it interesting this is the exact horsepower my C6 puts down with high lift rockers & Melrose headers, w/o a tune. I also hasten to point out that my 2009 with the Z51 weighs less than the C7 does . . . .
Of course, the C7 engine will soar to new HP with mods, as all the other LSX engines have done.
But in the meantime, I find it comforting that I won't be embarrased by any stock C7 I meet on the road.
It's the under the curve where the lt1 beats the ls-3. Loses ground then can't pull back!
That's where you need the A&A kit!
(Had to throw a plug in)
This is the 2nd dyno I've seen with the stock C7 ~413hp.
I find it interesting this is the exact horsepower my C6 puts down with high lift rockers & Melrose headers, w/o a tune. I also hasten to point out that my 2009 with the Z51 weighs less than the C7 does . . . .
Of course, the C7 engine will soar to new HP with mods, as all the other LSX engines have done.
But in the meantime, I find it comforting that I won't be embarrased by any stock C7 I meet on the road.
Originally Posted by Snorman
That's fantastic and I'm sure you're very proud.
Did your almighty C6 put down those numbers on either of the dynos in question?
S.
I read your half-baked sarcasm. Weak.
Dyno have always been used on all auto forums for general comparisons.
I made a comment on a comparison between a lightly modded C6 and a stock C7. Obviously the C7 will make even more power with the usual mods. I can deal with it. You need to be less tightly wrapped.
Last edited by fnbrowning; Oct 17, 2013 at 08:54 AM.
Do you guys have any prior experience with DI? I am surprised (as others are) at the A/F. If I remember correctly even boosted DI applications have been tuned leaner than that from the factory.
Do you guys have any prior experience with DI? I am surprised (as others are) at the A/F. If I remember correctly even boosted DI applications have been tuned leaner than that from the factory.
Any comment?
That is a factory tune in the graph. We didn't tune the car.
That is a factory tune in the graph. We didn't tune the car.
Sorry about the confusion, I knew this was a factory tune.
I am wondering why it is so rich? I have little to no experience with DI, but it seems that I remember seeing BMW335 dyno sheets (turbo DI) with cars that were extremely lean in the mid range (all the way up to peak torque) then flattening out around 13:1.
Sorry about the confusion, I knew this was a factory tune.
I am wondering why it is so rich? I have little to no experience with DI, but it seems that I remember seeing BMW335 dyno sheets (turbo DI) with cars that were extremely lean in the mid range (all the way up to peak torque) then flattening out around 13:1.
Found one, this is a stock BMW 335 (DI Turbo Six):
Note the A/F, very similar..I remembered wrong ...
Last edited by niphilli2; Oct 21, 2013 at 07:22 AM.
Sorry about the confusion, I knew this was a factory tune.
I am wondering why it is so rich? I have little to no experience with DI, but it seems that I remember seeing BMW335 dyno sheets (turbo DI) with cars that were extremely lean in the mid range (all the way up to peak torque) then flattening out around 13:1.