When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You guys do realize that tuners on this very forum have achieved AMG numbers with some simple mods, right?
And that's without DOHC and all the high revving jazz.
Yes, simple mods like an intake and cat back on an LS3 will put you right at 622 HP.
Yeah that power house dohc engine was overtaken by the lowly pushrod engine after only a few years. 375 hp and the car was a nose heavy pig in the handling dept. You guys that assume dohc is better also assume foreign cars are better...not.
Completely AGREE!!!...A person only has to look at F1 engines to be "INFORMED" that 300 HP per liter is achieved through DOHCs & 18,000 rpms...simple formula for HP...get as MUCH AIR IN & OUT as FAST as POSSIBLE!!!...Mark
Last edited by sidepipe seeker; Dec 4, 2013 at 02:25 AM.
And F1 engines tend to live for 150k miles of street driving.
Sarcasm
Don't get so hung up on import Hp numbers.
Hp is nothing more than a way express work done by the engine. It's an rpm ratio multiplied with the produced torque. What matters is torque, not hp on a gasoline engine capable of revving 6k and NOTHING comes close to a pushrod V8 in that regard (without power adders). Period.
And F1 engines tend to live for 150k miles of street driving.
Sarcasm
Don't get so hung up on import Hp numbers.
Hp is nothing more than a way express work done by the engine. It's an rpm ratio multiplied with the produced torque. What matters is torque, not hp on a gasoline engine capable of revving 6k and NOTHING comes close to a pushrod V8 in that regard (without power adders). Period.
Reliability?? This car off the assembly line with just gearing, 45gal.fuel cell and safety mods. The last 3 laps were done at 190+ and the avg. includes a stop to repair a coolant hose.
World Speed and Endurance Records set by the ZR-1:
Class 10 International; FIA Catagory A; Group 11:
100mi's: 175.6 mph
500mi's: 175.5
1000mi's: 174.4
5000km's: 175.7
5000mi's: 173.7
12hr. Distance: 175.5
24hr. Distance: 175.8
World Records Irrespective of Class or Catagory:
5000km's: 175.7
5000mi's: 173.7
24hr. Distance: 175.8
The LSx and now the LT1 motors are marvels of packaging, engineering, lightweight v power but let's call a spade a spade. They're really built for trucks. And it's that "scale" that allows the Corvette to be priced where it is. Build only 20,000 LT1 and see where you're price point goes.
Take the weight of an LT-5 and put it mid-engine as they did w the Corvette Indy, then see what you have.
GM has been so frustrating w a history of giving up on some really great cars precisely at the wrong moment.
The complexity of dohc will eventually make them obsolete unless the electric actuated valves can be made economically feasible. What does car and driver say, what does my teacher say, what does the internet tell me...arguing with morons.
the fact is no one really cares about the LT5 as an example.
GM set forth to show the world what a pushrod can do. They haven't even released the cam within a cam yet! There is still room to improve on their design. The truck engine comment is an opinion and this "truck engine" hangs with the top cars in the world as a CHEAP base model.
When will you guys leave retarded 90s mentality and accept the pushrod as different and not inferior?
The LS1 fbodys and vettes in '98 were raping DOHC FORDS BMWs and Audis. That motor will run with m3s and S5s even ten years newer. It even gets same or better MPGs than them.
Last edited by genv6.2gm; Dec 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM.
I believe GM stayed with the pushrod motor primarily due to packaging restraints in able to get that hood low without cutting into occupant interior space.
Ferrari along with Ducati and others measure there engine outputs and vehicle weights using an old and tested method of R - x (renormalized) = P/F
Wherein we find R=reality, x= whatever it takes, P/F = published figures.
I have owned many 14K rpm engines and they work great (especially if you turn the idle up to about 7000 rpm.)
Cam-in-block motors generally make more HP per pound of engine weight than OHC motors, and they have smaller exterior dimensions. DOHC, 4 or 5 valve per cylinder motors breathe better and can usually rev higher (pushrods tend to bend at higher rpms), although the state of the art in high-revs today is neither pushrods nor cams but compressed air valve actuation like is used in F1.
The last series of Corvette motors are a marvel of engineering, in my opinion, even if using a different design formula than Italians typically use. HP per liter only makes a difference when you are taxed on displacement (like is done in Europe) or when you need to meet a homologation or racing formula that limits displacement.
HP per liter only makes a difference when you are taxed on displacement (like is done in Europe) or when you need to meet a homologation or racing formula that limits displacement.
Great points...folks forget that engines are air pumps. Less moving parts, lighter wt, and as mentioned tight packaging are all very important design aspects that the ls and now lt engines succeed at.
Two pages, but not one word about CAFE standards and MPG ratios.
Ferrari is a premium Italian brand that doesn't give a shiat. GM is a Joe Sixpack US consumer car company that happens to also make the US's most iconic sports car. MPG ratios matter to Government Motors.
Most of the Coyote's power is imaginary... or a great marketing lie, whichever you prefer. Take it from a 2014 Mustang owner. Couple that with a useless transmission sourced from China and you basically have a car that should say "Hasbro" on the front.
I've never seen a dyno sheet for an F12, but my guess is that it is extremely peaky with little low end grunt compared to that peak HP number. That being said, it probably still makes over 300 ft-lbs at 2500 RPM, so low is a relative term. It's a monster, but track performance is about more than pure power. It's a about a complete integrated package that the driver is confident pushing to the limit.
You comment about the coyote shows you are mixed up. I agree the trans is rough, but you are mistakenly going by less off idle torque in your judgement of the coyote. My 100% stock Boss 302 has run 11.82 at 117... at a race weight of 3850. Look it up... it means its making MORE then the rated 444hp.
And F1 engines tend to live for 150k miles of street driving.
Sarcasm
Don't get so hung up on import Hp numbers.
Hp is nothing more than a way express work done by the engine. It's an rpm ratio multiplied with the produced torque. What matters is torque, not hp on a gasoline engine capable of revving 6k and NOTHING comes close to a pushrod V8 in that regard (without power adders). Period.
Torque is a direct by product of DISPLACEMENT!!!...pushrods add NOTHING to Torque. If there are two identical motors,same displacement/bore/stroke/compression ratio/cam/s profile,etc,etc, only difference being "1" motor is a OHV & the other is DOHC, the DOHC motor would make MORE torue & hp, 100 Per Cent of the time. Surprised at the amount of misinformed posters...Mark
Last edited by sidepipe seeker; Dec 4, 2013 at 06:51 PM.
The complexity of dohc will eventually make them obsolete unless the electric actuated valves can be made economically feasible. What does car and driver say, what does my teacher say, what does the internet tell me...arguing with morons.
This statement is LAUGHABLE!!!....How can a system ( OHC/s)( DOHC/s) that REDUCES moving parts, NO LIFTERS, PUSHRODS, ROCKER ARMS, ROCKER ARM SHAFTS, PEDESTALS be MORE COMPLEX????!!! Does Chuck think that ALL OHC motors have electric actuated valves???!!!...Mark
You comment about the coyote shows you are mixed up. I agree the trans is rough, but you are mistakenly going by less off idle torque in your judgement of the coyote. My 100% stock Boss 302 has run 11.82 at 117... at a race weight of 3850. Look it up... it means its making MORE then the rated 444hp.
I think my coyote makes less torque off idle than my fbody ls1. the coyote is a great engine too but these cars are geared way more aggressively than fbodys and vettes.
I dont have a boss though. boss' are sick. my '14 transmission has been holding up well so far but i installed a MGW as soon as i bought the car.
I think the 5th gen camaro is geared closely to a mustang.
Last edited by genv6.2gm; Dec 4, 2013 at 06:48 PM.
Completely AGREE!!!...A person only has to look at F1 engines to be "INFORMED" that 300 HP per liter is achieved through DOHCs & 18,000 rpms...simple formula for HP...get as MUCH AIR IN & OUT as FAST as POSSIBLE!!!...Mark
F1 engines, like all competition engines, have a maximum displacement stipulated by the rules.
All rulemakers limit displacement because it is the simplest and most effective method to make power. In F1, they also stipulate the cylinder count and impose a max RPM, among many other things.
Those engines are entirely a product of the rules; if these limitations weren't imposed upon them, no engineer would choose those particular trade-offs.
Why does the Corvette have to be compared with a car that costs 400 grand? That is stupid. Will it ever be possible to compare a Corvette with a European performance offering of equal price?
F1 engines, like all competition engines, have a maximum displacement stipulated by the rules.
All rulemakers limit displacement because it is the simplest and most effective method to make power. In F1, they also stipulate the cylinder count and impose a max RPM, among many other things.
Those engines are entirely a product of the rules; if these limitations weren't imposed upon them, no engineer would choose those particular trade-offs.
Those engines demonstrate even within the confines of the rules, what is possible using a DOHC design. Those motors "Even" with rule/s limitation/s are developing 300hp per liter ( 60 cubic inches) that is 5HP per Cubic Inch!!!....ASTONISHING in my opinion!!!...Mark
the fact is no one really cares about the LT5 as an example.
GM set forth to show the world what a pushrod can do. They haven't even released the cam within a cam yet! There is still room to improve on their design. The truck engine comment is an opinion and this "truck engine" hangs with the top cars in the world as a CHEAP base model.
When will you guys leave retarded 90s mentality and accept the pushrod as different and not inferior?
The LS1 fbodys and vettes in '98 were raping DOHC FORDS BMWs and Audis. That motor will run with m3s and S5s even ten years newer. It even gets same or better MPGs than them.
Really?
Oh wait! What's in the lane next to that C6? All motor.