When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
GM forgot to de-tune or locked the computer when they gave it to Motor Trend to test. The reality is the C8 showed the HP on the quarter mile runs. I would take quarter mile time over any dyno numbers.GM showed how we got robbed all these years in the exotic world.
So 650 hp can only muster 123 mph? Hahah Surely you can't be serious. Even a computer tune isn't giving that much HP. Not for a smooth idle only 6.2 liter engine. Or are you saying the 1/4 mile is indicative of 495 HP?
Last edited by TLS_Addict; Oct 23, 2019 at 09:18 PM.
This engine should be nicknamed the unicorn as I can’t think of any other 6.2L NA V8 that makes that much torque, BMEP is higher than NASCAR cup engine and it’s emissions compliant to boot lol
GM forgot to de-tune or locked the computer when they gave it to Motor Trend to test. The reality is the C8 showed the HP on the quarter mile runs. I would take quarter mile time over any dyno numbers.GM showed how we got robbed all these years in the exotic world.
Noting all the fuss over MT’s dyno pulls. Just something to think about here, It appears from the posted 1/4 mile et. and speed, that the car supplied to Motor Trend did INDEED have at LEAST 550 hp on tap. The Z51 - 3LT C8 weighs at Least 3650 lbs. when coolant, lubricants, and fuel are on board. The driver weighs somewhere in the neighborhood of 150 (plus) pounds, for an “as tested” weight of 3800 lbs. If the et is correct at 11.1 sec. and the speed is correct as 123.2 mph then this particular C8 was making at LEAST 550 hp. Could it be a ringer? who knows, but the math doesn’t lie. Just something to think about.
I did not read through this whole thread so sorry if this has already been said. My guess would be the high numbers are from dyno-ing the car in a gear that is not 1:1.
Noting all the fuss over MT’s dyno pulls. Just something to think about here, It appears from the posted 1/4 mile et. and speed, that the car supplied to Motor Trend did INDEED have at LEAST 550 hp on tap. The Z51 - 3LT C8 weighs at Least 3650 lbs. when coolant, lubricants, and fuel are on board. The driver weighs somewhere in the neighborhood of 150 (plus) pounds, for an “as tested” weight of 3800 lbs. If the et is correct at 11.1 sec. and the speed is correct as 123.2 mph then this particular C8 was making at LEAST 550 hp. Could it be a ringer? who knows, but the math doesn’t lie. Just something to think about.
Nope, you realize gearing and traction play a huge role right? It isn't just as simple as typing weight and hp into some online calculator.
Noting all the fuss over MT’s dyno pulls. Just something to think about here, It appears from the posted 1/4 mile et. and speed, that the car supplied to Motor Trend did INDEED have at LEAST 550 hp on tap. The Z51 - 3LT C8 weighs at Least 3650 lbs. when coolant, lubricants, and fuel are on board. The driver weighs somewhere in the neighborhood of 150 (plus) pounds, for an “as tested” weight of 3800 lbs. If the et is correct at 11.1 sec. and the speed is correct as 123.2 mph then this particular C8 was making at LEAST 550 hp. Could it be a ringer? who knows, but the math doesn’t lie. Just something to think about.
LOL, "Sub Driver" didn't like your hypothesis, feeling two factors were missing. Although he makes a good point, pay no mind to his tone. Too many clashes in here already. IMHO, it'll be interesting to see what's what when the smoke clears after multiple real-world verifications. As for me, it could be Flintstone-styled foot power, getting one. It could be Doc Brown 1.21 gigawatt flux capacitor-powered, getting one. 495 bhp? Getting one. 550 anything? Getting one. 600+ (1 in 1M odds), getting one. No manual trans (wait, what? Say it ain't so), still getting one. Understeer reported? Yep...still getting one. Anything but a turbo-4 and I'm in. An alleged sports car enthusiast asked me if the C8 was a 6 cyl. Me: "Yessir, and GM is throwing in two extra cylinders for pre-orders. Here's your sign." SMH
Last edited by Phantom Blur; Oct 24, 2019 at 07:04 PM.
Is the 650hp true? Nope. Disappointed that someone like Motor Trend would put their reputation in question by publishing garbage like this without multiple vehicles tested to get an average or abnormalities.... If it comes out that it was an abnormality and no others perform/test like this dyno test moving forward nobody
will believe anything they say/publish without doubt in their minds ....
It’s sad really....
Last edited by NoSoupForU; Oct 24, 2019 at 07:08 PM.
Is the 650hp true? Nope. Disappointed that someone like Motor Trend would put their reputation in question by publishing garbage like this without multiple vehicles tested to get an average or abnormalities.... If it comes out that it was an abnormality and no others perform/test like this dyno test moving forward nobody
will believe anything they say/publish without doubt in their minds ....
It’s sad really....
Is the 650hp true? Nope. Disappointed that someone like Motor Trend would put their reputation in question by publishing garbage like this without multiple vehicles tested to get an average or abnormalities.... If it comes out that it was an abnormality and no others perform/test like this dyno test moving forward nobody
will believe anything they say/publish without doubt in their minds ....
It’s sad really....
Yup. Their tested quarter mile trap speeds were so inconsistent with their dyno numbers, that it should have been slap-in-the-face obvious that something was amiss about the dyno setup or calibrations parameters. And they should have sorted this out before publishing.
So 650 hp can only muster 123 mph? Hahah Surely you can't be serious. Even a computer tune isn't giving that much HP. Not for a smooth idle only 6.2 liter engine. Or are you saying the 1/4 mile is indicative of 495 HP?
This is Motor Trend. 3 out of 5 of their 650 bhp C7 Z06's only ran 124 mph and they are 100 lb lighter.
This is Motor Trend. 3 out of 5 of their 650 bhp C7 Z06's only ran 124 mph and they are 100 lb lighter.
What were the weather conditions when they ran as I’m assuming they were pulling timing, were they running 91 octane, what aero package was on them and were they manuals?
This is Motor Trend. 3 out of 5 of their 650 bhp C7 Z06's only ran 124 mph and they are 100 lb lighter.
Maybe GM hid a turbo or two in the engine compartment and MT missed it. Who knows. But 123 mph trap speed for that heavy of a car does indicate more hp than the Z51 should have without some "help" from a friendly GM engine builder. We will all know in 6 months when we start seeing production cars hit the street.
Why was GM so guarded and what compelled MT to sneak a dyno run? Because they smelled a rat. And guess what? It was a ringer. Surprise, surprise! The times are fake. Manufacturers cheat and magazines are the usual dupes. Look at what VW tried to get away with. This was just a little white lie for them and they got busted.
Do you think it’s really true? If so going to be fun!!
After seeing all the hoopla over the dyno results MT reported, the GM Corvette Powertrain Engineers replied with "Science is hard"...as an AE that sums my thoughts up nicely too. We know for sure it pulled 495 SAE at the crank.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.