Paying
Suppose the out-the-door price of a C8 is $80,000.
You have saved $80,000 and are considering two options:
1) pay $80,000 cash, and deposit what would have been the monthly car payment in an income fund paying 7.00% return.
2) take out loan for 60 months at 3.00 percent, which is a $1,437 monthly payment (principal and interest). Keep your $80,000 cash invested in an income fund 7.00% return.
Where do you stand at the end of 60 months under these two options?
1) you paid cash 5 years ago, you now own a 5-year old C8 free and clear, and you now have $102,879 in your investment account
2) you took out a loan 5 years ago which is now paid off, you now own a 5-year old C8 free and clear, and you now have $113,410 in your investment account
Clarifying #1: take all their savings to buy the item = no debt but broke ( 4 in 10 adults couldn’t cover an unexpected $400 expense without selling something or borrowing money) #2 live on credit and make minimum payments in perpetuity.= broke (the typical American household now carries an average debt of $137,063. The median debt was only $50,971 in 2000.)
Last edited by 1SG_Ret; Oct 26, 2019 at 10:23 AM.
Suppose the out-the-door price of a C8 is $80,000.
You have saved $80,000 and are considering two options:
1) pay $80,000 cash, and deposit what would have been the monthly car payment in an income fund paying 7.00% return.
2) take out loan for 60 months at 3.00 percent, which is a $1,437 monthly payment (principal and interest). Keep your $80,000 cash invested in an income fund [negative] -7.00% return.
Where do you stand at the end of 60 months under these two options?
If it was a guaranteed or low risk return, that would be a different story. And 60 months (5 years) is not a long enough period of time to smooth out any market downturns.
Last edited by ArmchairArchitect; Oct 25, 2019 at 08:01 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
One more thing. I looked up that symbol given for a "7% return" up above. It's for an income mutual fund, not a growth fund. It reached 7% once for a short while, but is now just above 5%. Also, the fellow neglected to point out that the income was fully taxable as ordinary income. So you need to take away about 28% or so from these supposed gains, whatever your marginal tax rate is. So what that tells me is that every time we have this discussion (which is the same damn discussion every time) it affords people the opportunity to brag about how savvy they are. And the best thing to do about these huge "gains" people say they made is to treat them with a large grain of salt. If you follow through and examine what they say, you'll find they exaggerate more than a little. Taking financial advice from all these braggarts on this forum is like putting the Captain of the Titanic in charge of your water safety program. Good luck with that.
I have vast experience in the Field. I used to work at my Father's Flying A Gas Station back in the 60's.
It pays $82,000 a Month, so I only need to work there one Month to get a well equipped C8.
That being said, do people ask how someone paid to buy a $60,000 GMC Sierra Pickup Truck on their Forum?
Another scenario to consider would be an investor who has $200K invested in stock mutual funds. His investments have grown around 40% in the last 3 years. So he is reluctant to withdraw any of his money to buy a car, especially since he is able to get a car loan at 3.5%. So he borrows a $100K and keeps his $200K invested in stock mutual funds. Unfortunately for the investor, there is a change in political administrations in 2021 and the ultra friendly government business policies are changed. Business taxes are increased to their former levels, taxes are raised substantially on the "rich", and all regulations are restored to their former levels. So the stock market reacts predictably to these unfavorable conditions, and the S&P declines 30% in a year. So instead of growth, this hypothetical investor assets are reduced from $200K to $140K, and to make matters worse he still owes nearly $100K on his car.
This is the risk end of the equation which some choose to ignore: they've made a lot of money in the stock market in the past, so it's likely they'll continue to do so in the future. The stock market has done quite well for the past 20 years with an average annual return of nearly 10%, but that has not always been the case. For example it took an investor 25 years to recoup the losses in the stock market collapse which began in 1929. It wasn't until 1954 that the DOW Jones Industrial average reached the same level that it did in 1929.
I'm not predicting another depression. I'm just suggesting that risk shouldn't be ignored, and someones tolerance for risk should guide how he handles his investments.
Here's another try: $300,000 mortgage
Let's assume $300,000 mortgage, no down payment, 4.5% rate for 30 years. Payments are $1,520.06. After 30 years the total interest paid would be $247,220.13. With that same $300K in a 7% annual return investment, your $300K will be $2,283,676.513 at the end of 30 years, a gain of $1,983,676.51 ... so $1,983,676.51 minus the $247,220.13 = $1,736,456.38
You'd be $1.7M better off leaving your $300K in the 7% investment and borrowing $300K at 4.5% for the house.
my finance guy said I really shouldn’t give a crap, just buy the car. My portfolio will never notice it. Lol
How you ask? I married well...lol. Mom always said it’s just as easy to marry a rich girl as a poor girl, but it’ll be the hardest job you ever had staying with them. 35 years, Mom wasn’t wrong.
One more thing. I looked up that symbol given for a "7% return" up above. It's for an income mutual fund, not a growth fund. It reached 7% once for a short while, but is now just above 5%. Also, the fellow neglected to point out that the income was fully taxable as ordinary income. So you need to take away about 28% or so from these supposed gains, whatever your marginal tax rate is. So what that tells me is that every time we have this discussion (which is the same damn discussion every time) it affords people the opportunity to brag about how savvy they are. And the best thing to do about these huge "gains" people say they made is to treat them with a large grain of salt. If you follow through and examine what they say, you'll find they exaggerate more than a little. Taking financial advice from all these braggarts on this forum is like putting the Captain of the Titanic in charge of your water safety program. Good luck with that.
Another scenario to consider would be an investor who has $200K invested in stock mutual funds. His investments have grown around 40% in the last 3 years. So he is reluctant to withdraw any of his money to buy a car, especially since he is able to get a car loan at 3.5%. So he borrows a $100K and keeps his $200K invested in stock mutual funds. Unfortunately for the investor, there is a change in political administrations in 2021 and the ultra friendly government business policies are changed. Business taxes are increased to their former levels, taxes are raised substantially on the "rich", and all regulations are restored to their former levels. So the stock market reacts predictably to these unfavorable conditions, and the S&P declines 30% in a year. So instead of growth, this hypothetical investor assets are reduced from $200K to $140K, and to make matters worse he still owes nearly $100K on his car.
This is the risk end of the equation which some choose to ignore: they've made a lot of money in the stock market in the past, so it's likely they'll continue to do so in the future. The stock market has done quite well for the past 20 years with an average annual return of nearly 10%, but that has not always been the case. For example it took an investor 25 years to recoup the losses in the stock market collapse which began in 1929. It wasn't until 1954 that the DOW Jones Industrial average reached the same level that it did in 1929.
I'm not predicting another depression. I'm just suggesting that risk shouldn't be ignored, and someones tolerance for risk should guide how he handles his investments.
One more thing. I looked up that symbol given for a "7% return" up above. It's for an income mutual fund, not a growth fund. It reached 7% once for a short while, but is now just above 5%. Also, the fellow neglected to point out that the income was fully taxable as ordinary income. So you need to take away about 28% or so from these supposed gains, whatever your marginal tax rate is. So what that tells me is that every time we have this discussion (which is the same damn discussion every time) it affords people the opportunity to brag about how savvy they are. And the best thing to do about these huge "gains" people say they made is to treat them with a large grain of salt. If you follow through and examine what they say, you'll find they exaggerate more than a little. Taking financial advice from all these braggarts on this forum is like putting the Captain of the Titanic in charge of your water safety program. Good luck with that.
I know of No lender that has a more favorable interest rate above a 780 FICO score (the REAL score).
Not some BS Credit Karma score, all scams.
FICO is the only score that counts.
It didn't cost me one penny.
If you can do it, that's a nice way to get Free perks.
















