When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
These posts kill me. No discussion of a person’s overall leverage (house, cars, margin accounts, credit cards)—total debt to total assets. The other thing that is not mentioned is that car loans are not tax deductible. There is in inverted yield curve right now, which generally does not portent for medium term equity gains. Also there are very compressed spreads in lower investment grade bonds (BBB-/Baa3) which is also a late cycle indicator.
Last edited by Michael T*; Oct 25, 2019 at 09:43 PM.
These posts kill me. No discussion of a person’s overall leverage (house, cars, margin accounts, credit cards)—total debt to total assets. The other thing that is not mentioned is that car loans are not tax deductible. There is in inverted yield curve right now, which generally does not portent for medium term equity gains. Also there are very compressed spreads in lower investment grade bonds (BBB-/Baa3) which is also a late cycle indicator.
Average bull runs last 4.5 years. This is the 10th year of the bull run. So your data is not at all surprising.
I keep seeing 'depreciating asset' description making it a reason to finance vs. paying cash. Can someone explain it why it makes a difference if it is a depreciating or appreciating asset that you finance vs. pay cash for? I mean you're loosing money on the car in either way. It doesn't matter when you're paying for it. I'm not looking for an explanation of borrowing at 2% and earning 7% on investment, strictly why it matters that it is a depreciating asset.
Assumption: no current debt, would be able to pay cash
All you financial wizards care to answer my question?
Originally Posted by 1snake
I'm simply going to put the entire purchase on my Visa card, pay it off in 1 month and get all those "tax free" perks from a $80K+ purchase.
I tried that a few times. Unfortunately, the answer I get is that we could put $5K on your card and I have to pay cash (check) or finance the rest. Card companies charge 2-3%, I think for the business.
Originally Posted by jcapps
Sorry dude, you can spin it anyway you want. First off I never said 7%, second I said its one of mine, you want better do your own research. third, its still a much smarter way to go then to pay cash. So, again, spin all you want, the current return 6.78%.........all vary, higher and lower, but, again, spin all you want.........In four years I will have 100+ STILL invested.......those who pay cash will have a depreciated asset....maybe $45k
Unless the investment sank. There are precedents where a $100K position drops 30% or more overnight.
Also, you paid monthly payments for 4 years.
Most people forget about tax liabilities on earnings and also the fact that loans are paid back with money after inflation (from future earnings). So all these calculations should include taxes and the rate of inflation.
You guys should really try options, that's where the real money is made! Why have 7% return when you could make 70%?
My background is scientific: BS EE, Johns Hopkins. I do enjoy reading financial books however, and I enjoy reading John Bogle and learned quite a bit from him. I can still recall some of his insights: Stock-market risk:"If you have trouble imagining a 20% loss in the stock market, you shouldn't be in stocks." Diversification: "Don't look for the needle in the haystack. Just buy the haystack." Trusting brokers: "It's amazing how difficult it is for a man to understand something if he's paid a small fortune not to understand it."
This one takes some thought and I suppose that there are different interpretations. Mine would be that a securities salesperson makes his money by ignoring a product flaws and not suggesting alternatives that are better for his client but less profitable for the salesperson.
BTW I just finished reading " Firefighting - The Financial Crisis and its Lessons. It was a collaborative effort by Bernanke, Geithner, and Paulson. I had no idea how close the US came to a full fledged depression until I read the book. It's an audio book, so you can listen to it during your commutes.
Would be no different, 5-year comparison vs 30-year comparison. Sounds like you just don't like seeing what appears to be a large interest payment.
Here's another try: $300,000 mortgage
Let's assume $300,000 mortgage, no down payment, 4.5% rate for 30 years. Payments are $1,520.06. After 30 years the total interest paid would be $247,220.13. With that same $300K in a 7% annual return investment, your $300K will be $2,283,676.513 at the end of 30 years, a gain of $1,983,676.51 ... so $1,983,676.51 minus the $247,220.13 = $1,736,456.38
You'd be $1.7M better off leaving your $300K in the 7% investment and borrowing $300K at 4.5% for the house.
I've got a bunch of cash I've love to invest right now and enjoy a 7% return for up to 30 years, also have a home I inherited that should soon sell for close to half a mil. Please give me a few leads on where I can get 7%, my portfolios in Vanguard, Fidelity, and Ameritrade are laggers compared to that right now.
You've missed this point. There is NO investment available today that is guaranteed to pay "a 7% annual return." Your projections are based on the PAST. It doesn't exist going forward. ..
I've got a bunch of cash I've love to invest right now and enjoy a 7% return for up to 30 years, also have a home I inherited that should soon sell for close to half a mil. Please give me a few leads on where I can get 7%, my portfolios in Vanguard, Fidelity, and Ameritrade are laggers compared to that right now.
In case you missed it, in post #77 I wrote: Agreed, no guaranteed returns like that ... none that I know of anyway, unless you're a politician ... but let me say that my employer terminated our company's IRA plan, distributed it to us employees, and I rolled mine over to a set of Vanguard index funds on 10/22/2012. My account value is up 87.61% as of yesterday's market close. That's 6.95 years which is a compound annual growth rate of 9.47%. Yes, I'm aware that the market has done very well over that period, but I'm comfortable with the stated 6.78% or even 7% average long-term stock market returns. It's probably actually somewhat higher than that ... but who knows what tomorrow will bring
9.47% per year for almost 7 years. That's great. Do I guarantee it will continue, or even think it will, no, no I do not. Not at all. I had money in the market when it tanked in '08 including all the way down to the Dow's March 9th 2009 bottom at 6,547, so I'm well aware of had far it can fall and how people panic. But if the market continue going up, good. And if it falls, I keep cash on hand to put more in.
I invest in a set of Vanguard index funds, some Domestic, some International, some Emerging Markets, some Small Cap, some Large Cap, and some Short Term Bond. I have specific set allocations for each one. When I have more cash to put in, I put it into the funds that are lagging my targets ... that causes me to 'buy low".
I too have a bunch of Vanguard funds and try to stay on top of the best performing sectors every few months. Done this since the '90's, this year pretty much sucks however. Same with Fidelity and the market in general. Maybe I just am expecting too much.
Past performance is no guarantee of what to expect in the future. Thanks, though.
Understand, but when it comes to investing not one company will leave out the disclaimer on risk. If everything came with a 100% guarantee, wouldn't everyone sign up?
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.