When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I wonder if people freaked out like this when we switched from horse and buggies to automobiles.
Actually they really did. I read an article that people in the day warned of catastrophic results if the world switched to horseless carriages.
Some of the thoughts then:
Horseless carriages would be capable of traveling as much as 30mph. This would result in tens of thousands of vehicle accidents and pedestrian deaths
The wholesale handling of a volatile substance, gasoline, would result in catastrophic fires that would eventually destroy the world.
How would fields be plowed without horses? The "vision" of tractors powered by gasoline and diesel engines didn't really sink in at the time. The world would starve.
The argument was so impacting that congress almost passed a law against the development of motor driven carriages.
So ICE vehicle engines don’t degrade? Everything has planned obsolescence and BEV is the same. Us old guys can fight it. I will always own my C8 with a loud V8 but the industry is transforming. This is the third time since 1900. Anyone know the first two?
All very good points, but as of now the big three US manufacturers are hell bent on going full EV. I think it is a major mistake, but time will tell.
Ford CEO announced they will not abandon ICE as quickly in their truck lines. Said it will be impractical to do so. Smart. I’m not a Ford guy but like his rationale.
It will probably be more like 5-10. We’re already nearing cost parity. I love my Vette and can’t wait to get my ‘23, but also realize it will probably be my last ICE vehicle. I bought a Tesla Model X years ago and it’s been great… no regrets after 36,000 miles including many long road trips.
Like any new technology, we’ll hit a market tipping point where suddenly the “old” technology becomes undesirable and you can’t give it away. CRT based TVs, flip phones, VCRs… all became undesirable once the markets for the replacement technologies hit the tipping point. The same will happen with ICE vehicles. I’ll unload my ‘23 before that happens.
I will never find an ICE vehicle undesirable. May find fuel is too high to drive though.
If they improve to the point where they are truly comparable to ICE vehicles in convenience and battery life improves I might consider eventually. If I can drive a battery vehicle for 150-200 thousand miles like an ICE vehicle and still have the same resale value then ok. Battery replacement costs will have to be in line with engine rebuild or replacement costs.
Just wait until everyone wakes up and realizes the cost and environmental stress battery production causes.
Lol. You are giving the general public way too much credit. Most are mindless sheep too ignorant to understand that lobbying money and profit is driving these changes. My belief is to allow both to proliferate via capitalism and exist side by side. Consumers can vote with their dollars rather than having things forced on them.
As the old saying goes, "It's easier to fool someone, than to convince them they've been fooled."
It will take 30 new power plants and a total revamp our vulnerable and hackable electric grid to make EV's workable. But, 300 or even 500 mile battery range still won't be sufficient until they come up with a way to fully charge an EV in 5 or 10 minutes. As for GM to commit total EV's is not only stupid it's most likely to cause another bunch of government auto companies bailouts. It's a totally stupid and impractical business decision. In 13 years our country with a 30 trillion dollar dept and pending deep recession and all our jobs leaving this country and with right now 3 1/2 million illegal and un documented immigrants, I hate to burst your bubble, but it's NOT going to happen. The old saying "Never put all your eggs in one basket" is true. They should have committed to a 60 to 40 mix because of the percentage of people in rural and suburban areas. But, I've lived long enough to see plenty of companies seal their own doom by jumping on and off the popular bandwagon at that time.
Just wait until everyone wakes up and realizes the cost and environmental stress battery production causes. Wait until people get tired of waiting 20 minutes for a "super charge". Wait until low resale values of used EVs with nearly spent batteries are experienced by the public. Wait until a Corvette owner has to pay for new battery, battery installation, and old battery replacement. Oh yes, wait until there are so many EVs that our "green" electric grid can't charge them all. A slick salesman will sell you this great alternative technology that avoids all the above - an internal combustion engine.
Yep. Point well made. Could add another 3 pages to this list.
Actually they really did. I read an article that people in the day warned of catastrophic results if the world switched to horseless carriages.
Some of the thoughts then:
Horseless carriages would be capable of traveling as much as 30mph. This would result in tens of thousands of vehicle accidents and pedestrian deaths
The wholesale handling of a volatile substance, gasoline, would result in catastrophic fires that would eventually destroy the world.
How would fields be plowed without horses? The "vision" of tractors powered by gasoline and diesel engines didn't really sink in at the time. The world would starve.
The argument was so impacting that congress almost passed a law against the development of motor driven carriages.
Yes, very little difference in sides, just 100 years later with some different details.
Those who say it can't be done, those who say it can and must be done. I know which side wins..it's inevitable...
Congress changes so often they're less impacting on the whole idea. State and local jurisdictions are much more impacting. In some states, local municipalities are no longer approving permits for new gasoline stations. State edicts like CA is doing regarding no sales of ICE vehicles allowed after a date certain have a way of moving sentiment...like it or not.
Those who say they'll never buy an EV might be walking someday as they might not be able to buy fuel or register an ICE vehicle in some or all states.
Yes, very little difference in sides, just 100 years later with some different details.
Those who say it can't be done, those who say it can and must be done. I know which side wins..it's inevitable...
Congress changes so often they're less impacting on the whole idea. State and local jurisdictions are much more impacting. In some states, local municipalities are no longer approving permits for new gasoline stations. State edicts like CA is doing regarding no sales of ICE vehicles allowed after a date certain have a way of moving sentiment...like it or not.
Those who say they'll never buy an EV might be walking someday as they might not be able to buy fuel or register an ICE vehicle in some or all states.
Exactly. Most people dont realize it is not about saving the environment , it's about controlling people and their movements. 🤯
i dont believe battery only EVs will end up being a long term solution. density, weight, charge time, cost to replace, cost to dispose, materials required to make EV batteries, electric power infrastructure limits with no major planning to massively increase electricity generation. then you get into things like, say you are on the coast, hurricane is coming, you need to go north, roads are jammed, limited 'refueling' availability. example is savannah to macon GA evac corridor. they block all south bound lanes to double the exit volume but it still backs up.
comparing motor cars to horse and buggy. yes folks freaked but it soon became obvious that there were lots of advantages to replacing your wagon with a model t. the advantages of replacing ICE are supposed reduced cost for 'fuel' but that cannot last. energy has to come from somewhere. it costs to produce. i dont see any other advantages for EV other than that.
the advantages of replacing ICE are supposed reduced cost for 'fuel' but that cannot last. energy has to come from somewhere. it costs to produce. i dont see any other advantages for EV other than that.
I think you're missing the reasoning for the push to change. It's not the cost of fuel. It's burning fossil fuels and the impact on the environment that drives one side of this argument.
Lately i have been seeing that companies are testing altenative/synthetic fuels that are clean burning. I have a feeling that we will see a big jump in this soon. also the 2035 law says no gasoline powered cars so, traditional ICE engines will not go away, especially in the trucking industry. My hope is that someone make a synthetic blend that burns similar to gas, but has no carbon emissions and basically will work on all cars past/present/future (A man can dream).
You can't change physics, no matter how much you wish it.
Batteries will always have low energy density. Batteries will always have charging limits. Batteries will always degrade from the time they are manufactured.
Yes, and density will get better, those limits will continue to improve, and degradation is much less of an issue than people seem to think. There are 1st gen Tesla model S still driving around on the original batteries. There are hundreds of millions of dollars being spent on battery research. Today's LI tech isn't the end of the process, it's the beginning. Why people think technology stands still, when history demonstrates the opposite, I'll never understand. We're not still driving around with 10 liter V12s producing 120 HP, and in 20 years we won't be driving around on today's battery and motor technology.
Last edited by Red Mist Rulz; Sep 22, 2022 at 03:19 PM.
Porsche is already doing this. They have produced a synthetic gasoline. Actually this has been done before. During WW2 the ***** produced synthetic fuel. The downside was it was very costly to produce.
Yes, and density will get better, those limits will continue to improve, and degradation is much less of an issue than people seem to think. There are 1st gen Tesla model S still driving around on the original batteries. There are hundreds of millions of dollars being spent on battery research. Today's LI tech isn't the end of the process, it's the beginning. Why people think technology stands still, when history demonstrates the opposite, I'll never understand. We're not still driving around with 10 liter V12s producing 120 HP, and it 20 years we won't be driving around on today's battery and motor technology.
Yeah, completely agree. People want to predict the future based on today's knowledge...and is why one side lost in the horseless carraige debate 100 years ago and will lose again this time.