FL proposed detector legislation
In recognition that this bill is at least as much related to municipal revenue enhancement as it is to safety, I wish to make a modest proposal:
I suggest that the bill be amended to include language requiring that fine income above 20% of a town's operating budget be sent to the State of Florida.
My guess is that the good Senator will drop his bill like a hot potato.
1. Radar Detector Detector - A device that listens for specific frequencies emanating from poorly shielded Radar detectors. These detectors use a superheterodyne receivers that radiate on specific frequencies. Today, most quality radar-detectors do a good job in shielding and escape detection from the VG-2.
To illustrate just how far this game of cat and mouse will go, there are now radar-detector-detector-detectors (I think I've got this right..) that will shut off the radar-detector if it detects a radar-detector-detector...
2. Instant-on Radar with vehicle speed monitoring. The operator of the radar unit waits until he sees a speeder. Then pulls the trigger to measure the vehicle speed. If the vehicle suddenly slows down right at the moment the trigger is pulled, the radar operator has reason to suspect that the vehicle has an operating radar detector onboard.
Last edited by dgdoc; Mar 3, 2007 at 01:07 PM.





1. Radar Detector Detector - A device that listens for specific frequencies emanating from poorly shielded Radar detectors. These detectors use a superheterodyne receivers that radiate on specific frequencies. Today, most of quality devices do a good job in shielding and escape detection from the VG-2.
To illustrate just how far this game of cat and mouse will go, there are now radar-detector-detector-detectors (I think I've got this right..) that will shut off the radar-detector if it detects a radar-detector-detector...
2. Instant-on Radar with vehicle speed monitoring. The operator of the radar unit waits until he sees a speeder. Then pulls the trigger to measure the vehicle speed. If the vehicle suddenly slows down right at the moment the trigger is pulled, the radar operator has reason to suspect that the vehicle has an operating radar detector onboard.
Bottom line - there are PLENTY of speeders without detectors out there to give all the tickets in the world to - the reason they want to pass this bill is that they are trying to control all the drivers and specifically the "bad" drivers who speed (like all the rest) but slow down to avoid tickets (naughty naughty).
This **** happened in Ontario, Canada - and the result today is that there are very few laser units because of the lack of radar detectors - so they run radar, give out as many tickets as they want, and use VG2 to nail the guys who buy the cheaper radar units (read: not valentine 1) that can be picked up by VG2.
And technology marches on!
I stopped using a radar detector in Canada long ago. They just sit in plain view on the sides of the road or come up behind you. If you are vigilant in looking for them, you'll always spot them. Now - if you try to drive in the U.S. without one, you're looking for trouble, as they really try to hide and us instant on etc etc. Frankly, it is easier to speed in Canada because the detectors are outlawed. Just buy a valentine 1 and enjoy!
The only real problem if they get truly outlawed is that the detector companies will be put out of business!
Glenn
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
any reasonable person in this country knows that speed enforcement is a revenue generator policy and has nothing to do with safety. There are no known incidents to date where a police radar prevented a Z06 crash during an all out high speed run.
Bondmid003, I agree, driving through VA is one of the worst part of my trip to FL. I usually avoid stopping in VA for the same reason, why should I support their economy with my gasoline and food purchases?
Mr. Wonderful, one other thought, your uninformed sentiment about "speed kills" won't find too many sympathetic ears on this forum.
On the trip home, the traffic flowed about 50 or less, and there were usually a couple of accidents.
As to being proven, I have never found anything to support that. The NTHSA accident and death reports each year try to point to that, but they never prove it. Similar to the helmet law issues with "proving" that helmetless riders will die more often. They just may, but they have to be in an accident to find out. And while there has been a steady increase in rider deaths in Florida, no one has mentioned the increase in riders.

Bad drivers will cause accidents if they go slow or fast...
Slow drivers are a SERIOUS problem in Florida and they cause tons of accident.. You can see some 85+ year old people driving with 25 mph in a 45 mph limit etc... or like 50 mph on the interstate..
Speed Traps = Revenue
Ban Detectors = Just Go Stealth
It makes no difference.
If the Politicians truly cared about Public Safety - they would ban the Octogenarians that drive the wrong way on 1 way streets (saw it 3 times in the past week coming towards me - serious) and the multitude of inattentive and slow drivers.
They kill - not speed.














